Cargando…

Efficacy of chitosan derivative films versus hydrocolloid dressing on superficial wounds

OBJECTIVES: Chitosan, the N-deacetylated derivative of chitin, has useful biological properties that promote haemostasis, analgesia, wound healing, and scar reduction; chitosan is bacteriostatic, biocompatible, and biodegradable. This study determined the efficacy of chitosan derivative film as a su...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Halim, Ahmad S., Nor, Fatimah M., Mat Saad, Arman Z., Mohd Nasir, Nur A., Norsa'adah, Bachok, Ujang, Zanariah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taibah University 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6695037/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31435371
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtumed.2018.10.004
_version_ 1783443954118688768
author Halim, Ahmad S.
Nor, Fatimah M.
Mat Saad, Arman Z.
Mohd Nasir, Nur A.
Norsa'adah, Bachok
Ujang, Zanariah
author_facet Halim, Ahmad S.
Nor, Fatimah M.
Mat Saad, Arman Z.
Mohd Nasir, Nur A.
Norsa'adah, Bachok
Ujang, Zanariah
author_sort Halim, Ahmad S.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Chitosan, the N-deacetylated derivative of chitin, has useful biological properties that promote haemostasis, analgesia, wound healing, and scar reduction; chitosan is bacteriostatic, biocompatible, and biodegradable. This study determined the efficacy of chitosan derivative film as a superficial wound dressing. METHODS: This multicentre randomised controlled trial included 244 patients, of whom 86 were treated with chitosan derivative film and 84 with hydrocolloid. The percentage of epithelisation, as well as patient comfort, clinical signs, and patient convenience in application and removal of the dressings were assessed. RESULTS: The primary outcome of this study was the percentage of epithelisation. Except for race (p = 0.04), there were no significant differences between groups in sex, age, antibiotic usage, or initial wound size (p > 0.05). There was no significant difference in the mean epithelisation percentage between groups (p = 0.29). Patients using chitosan derivative film experienced more pain during removal of dressing than those in the hydrocolloid group (p = 0.007). The chitosan derivative film group showed less exudate (p = 0.036) and less odour (p = 0.024) than the control group. Furthermore, there were no significant differences between groups in terms of adherence, ease of removal, wound drainage, erythema, itchiness, pain, and tenderness. No oedema or localised warmth was observed during the study. CONCLUSION: This study concluded that chitosan derivative film is equivalent to hydrocolloid dressing and can be an option in the management of superficial and abrasion wounds. CLINICAL TRIAL NO. NMRR-11-948-10565.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6695037
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Taibah University
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66950372019-08-21 Efficacy of chitosan derivative films versus hydrocolloid dressing on superficial wounds Halim, Ahmad S. Nor, Fatimah M. Mat Saad, Arman Z. Mohd Nasir, Nur A. Norsa'adah, Bachok Ujang, Zanariah J Taibah Univ Med Sci Experimental Article OBJECTIVES: Chitosan, the N-deacetylated derivative of chitin, has useful biological properties that promote haemostasis, analgesia, wound healing, and scar reduction; chitosan is bacteriostatic, biocompatible, and biodegradable. This study determined the efficacy of chitosan derivative film as a superficial wound dressing. METHODS: This multicentre randomised controlled trial included 244 patients, of whom 86 were treated with chitosan derivative film and 84 with hydrocolloid. The percentage of epithelisation, as well as patient comfort, clinical signs, and patient convenience in application and removal of the dressings were assessed. RESULTS: The primary outcome of this study was the percentage of epithelisation. Except for race (p = 0.04), there were no significant differences between groups in sex, age, antibiotic usage, or initial wound size (p > 0.05). There was no significant difference in the mean epithelisation percentage between groups (p = 0.29). Patients using chitosan derivative film experienced more pain during removal of dressing than those in the hydrocolloid group (p = 0.007). The chitosan derivative film group showed less exudate (p = 0.036) and less odour (p = 0.024) than the control group. Furthermore, there were no significant differences between groups in terms of adherence, ease of removal, wound drainage, erythema, itchiness, pain, and tenderness. No oedema or localised warmth was observed during the study. CONCLUSION: This study concluded that chitosan derivative film is equivalent to hydrocolloid dressing and can be an option in the management of superficial and abrasion wounds. CLINICAL TRIAL NO. NMRR-11-948-10565. Taibah University 2018-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6695037/ /pubmed/31435371 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtumed.2018.10.004 Text en © 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Experimental Article
Halim, Ahmad S.
Nor, Fatimah M.
Mat Saad, Arman Z.
Mohd Nasir, Nur A.
Norsa'adah, Bachok
Ujang, Zanariah
Efficacy of chitosan derivative films versus hydrocolloid dressing on superficial wounds
title Efficacy of chitosan derivative films versus hydrocolloid dressing on superficial wounds
title_full Efficacy of chitosan derivative films versus hydrocolloid dressing on superficial wounds
title_fullStr Efficacy of chitosan derivative films versus hydrocolloid dressing on superficial wounds
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of chitosan derivative films versus hydrocolloid dressing on superficial wounds
title_short Efficacy of chitosan derivative films versus hydrocolloid dressing on superficial wounds
title_sort efficacy of chitosan derivative films versus hydrocolloid dressing on superficial wounds
topic Experimental Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6695037/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31435371
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtumed.2018.10.004
work_keys_str_mv AT halimahmads efficacyofchitosanderivativefilmsversushydrocolloiddressingonsuperficialwounds
AT norfatimahm efficacyofchitosanderivativefilmsversushydrocolloiddressingonsuperficialwounds
AT matsaadarmanz efficacyofchitosanderivativefilmsversushydrocolloiddressingonsuperficialwounds
AT mohdnasirnura efficacyofchitosanderivativefilmsversushydrocolloiddressingonsuperficialwounds
AT norsaadahbachok efficacyofchitosanderivativefilmsversushydrocolloiddressingonsuperficialwounds
AT ujangzanariah efficacyofchitosanderivativefilmsversushydrocolloiddressingonsuperficialwounds