Cargando…

Is the discopathy associated with Modic changes an infectious process? Results from a prospective monocenter study

BACKGROUND: The local infectious origin and the putative role of Cutibacterium acnes (CA) of a particular subtype of discopathy (Modic 1) are still debated. PURPOSE: To establish the association of CA in intervertebral disc (IVD) and Modic 1 discopathy in patients with low back pain. METHODS: The pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahmed-Yahia, Salim, Decousser, Jean-Winoc, Flouzat-Lachaniette, Charles Henri, Dervin, Guillaume, Roubineau, François, Audureau, Etienne, Hourdille, Alexia, Royer, Guilhem, Eymard, Florent, Chevalier, Xavier
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6695213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31415619
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221030
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The local infectious origin and the putative role of Cutibacterium acnes (CA) of a particular subtype of discopathy (Modic 1) are still debated. PURPOSE: To establish the association of CA in intervertebral disc (IVD) and Modic 1 discopathy in patients with low back pain. METHODS: The prevalence of bacteria in IVD samples obtained by anterior approach in patient with chronic low back pain harboring Modic type 1, 2 or no Modic changes was compared to that measured in IVD samples obtained by posterior approach for sciatica. From 45 patients included in the study, 77 discs samples were obtained: 58 by anterior approach (32 Modic 1/2 changes, 26 without Modic change) and 19 by posterior approach. Conventional microbial cultures, universal 16S rRNA molecular detection and a CA specific PCR were performed. RESULTS: 12 /77 (15.6%) disc samples were culture positive. Among the 10 CA positive cultures, 5 out of 58 (8.6%) were identified from specimens obtained by anterior approach and 5/19 (26.3%) from posterior approach (p = 0.046). Moreover, the percentage of CA culture positive sample was statistically no different between the patient with or without Modic changes. The CA prevalence was lower through molecular, culture—free approaches: the universal 16S rRNA PCR was positive for 6 specimens, including one CA positive sample and the CA specific PCR was positive for one specimen obtained by posterior approach. CONCLUSIONS: In spine surgery the prevalence of CA in culture was significantly higher in IVD samples collected through a posterior approach compared to an anterior approach, suggesting a contamination process. This study did not support the CA related local infectious origin of Modic 1 discopathy.