Cargando…

Difference of Critical Shoulder Angle (CSA) According to Minimal Rotation: Can Minimal Rotation of the Scapula Be Allowed in the Evaluation of CSA?

BACKGROUND: Minimal rotation of the scapula may affect the measurement of critical shoulder angle (CSA). We investigated the difference in the CSA measured in minimal rotation between the patients with rotator cuff tear and those without non-rotator cuff tear and the CSA measurement error by compari...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Jung-Han, Gwak, Heui-Chul, Kim, Chang-Wan, Lee, Chang-Rack, Kwon, Yong-Uk, Seo, Hyeong-Won
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Orthopaedic Association 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6695323/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31475052
http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/cios.2019.11.3.309
_version_ 1783444014059487232
author Kim, Jung-Han
Gwak, Heui-Chul
Kim, Chang-Wan
Lee, Chang-Rack
Kwon, Yong-Uk
Seo, Hyeong-Won
author_facet Kim, Jung-Han
Gwak, Heui-Chul
Kim, Chang-Wan
Lee, Chang-Rack
Kwon, Yong-Uk
Seo, Hyeong-Won
author_sort Kim, Jung-Han
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Minimal rotation of the scapula may affect the measurement of critical shoulder angle (CSA). We investigated the difference in the CSA measured in minimal rotation between the patients with rotator cuff tear and those without non-rotator cuff tear and the CSA measurement error by comparing with computed tomography (CT). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tear and whose X-ray views correspond to Suter-Henninger classification type A1 and C1. The CSA values between the normal control group (without rotator cuff tear) and the rotator cuff tear group were compared according to A1 type and C1 type. In the rotator cuff tear group, we compared the CSA values measured by using X-ray and CT. RESULTS: A total of 238 patients (rotator cuff tear group, 139 patients; normal cuff group, 99 patients) were included in this study. The mean CSA of the rotator cuff tear group was 33.4° ± 3.5°, and that of the normal cuff group was 32.6° ± 3.9° (p = 0.085). On comparison of the CSA according to the Suter-Henninger classification type, the CSA values on the A1 type view and C1 type view were 32.7° ± 3.5° and 33.7° ± 3.5°, respectively, in the rotator cuff tear group and 30.5° ± 3.1° and 33.1 ± 3.9°, respectively, in the normal cuff group (p = 0.024 and p = 0.216, respectively). The mean CSA was 32.5° ± 3.1° in CT and 33.3° ± 3.2° in X-ray (p = 0.184). On comparison of the CSA according to the Suter-Henninger classification type, the CSA values on the A1 type view and C1 type view were 32.6° ± 3.6° and 32.5° ± 2.4°, respectively, in CT and 32.5° ± 3.5° and 34.2° ± 2.6°, respectively, in X-ray (p = 0.905 and p = 0.017, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The X-ray view corresponding to Suter-Henninger classification type A1 or CT-reconstructed image can be used to reduce the measurement error and obtain reliable CSA values. The CSA measured on the X-ray view corresponding to Suter-Henninger classification type A1 may be related with rotator cuff tear.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6695323
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher The Korean Orthopaedic Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66953232019-09-01 Difference of Critical Shoulder Angle (CSA) According to Minimal Rotation: Can Minimal Rotation of the Scapula Be Allowed in the Evaluation of CSA? Kim, Jung-Han Gwak, Heui-Chul Kim, Chang-Wan Lee, Chang-Rack Kwon, Yong-Uk Seo, Hyeong-Won Clin Orthop Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Minimal rotation of the scapula may affect the measurement of critical shoulder angle (CSA). We investigated the difference in the CSA measured in minimal rotation between the patients with rotator cuff tear and those without non-rotator cuff tear and the CSA measurement error by comparing with computed tomography (CT). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tear and whose X-ray views correspond to Suter-Henninger classification type A1 and C1. The CSA values between the normal control group (without rotator cuff tear) and the rotator cuff tear group were compared according to A1 type and C1 type. In the rotator cuff tear group, we compared the CSA values measured by using X-ray and CT. RESULTS: A total of 238 patients (rotator cuff tear group, 139 patients; normal cuff group, 99 patients) were included in this study. The mean CSA of the rotator cuff tear group was 33.4° ± 3.5°, and that of the normal cuff group was 32.6° ± 3.9° (p = 0.085). On comparison of the CSA according to the Suter-Henninger classification type, the CSA values on the A1 type view and C1 type view were 32.7° ± 3.5° and 33.7° ± 3.5°, respectively, in the rotator cuff tear group and 30.5° ± 3.1° and 33.1 ± 3.9°, respectively, in the normal cuff group (p = 0.024 and p = 0.216, respectively). The mean CSA was 32.5° ± 3.1° in CT and 33.3° ± 3.2° in X-ray (p = 0.184). On comparison of the CSA according to the Suter-Henninger classification type, the CSA values on the A1 type view and C1 type view were 32.6° ± 3.6° and 32.5° ± 2.4°, respectively, in CT and 32.5° ± 3.5° and 34.2° ± 2.6°, respectively, in X-ray (p = 0.905 and p = 0.017, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The X-ray view corresponding to Suter-Henninger classification type A1 or CT-reconstructed image can be used to reduce the measurement error and obtain reliable CSA values. The CSA measured on the X-ray view corresponding to Suter-Henninger classification type A1 may be related with rotator cuff tear. The Korean Orthopaedic Association 2019-09 2019-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6695323/ /pubmed/31475052 http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/cios.2019.11.3.309 Text en Copyright © 2019 by The Korean Orthopaedic Association http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kim, Jung-Han
Gwak, Heui-Chul
Kim, Chang-Wan
Lee, Chang-Rack
Kwon, Yong-Uk
Seo, Hyeong-Won
Difference of Critical Shoulder Angle (CSA) According to Minimal Rotation: Can Minimal Rotation of the Scapula Be Allowed in the Evaluation of CSA?
title Difference of Critical Shoulder Angle (CSA) According to Minimal Rotation: Can Minimal Rotation of the Scapula Be Allowed in the Evaluation of CSA?
title_full Difference of Critical Shoulder Angle (CSA) According to Minimal Rotation: Can Minimal Rotation of the Scapula Be Allowed in the Evaluation of CSA?
title_fullStr Difference of Critical Shoulder Angle (CSA) According to Minimal Rotation: Can Minimal Rotation of the Scapula Be Allowed in the Evaluation of CSA?
title_full_unstemmed Difference of Critical Shoulder Angle (CSA) According to Minimal Rotation: Can Minimal Rotation of the Scapula Be Allowed in the Evaluation of CSA?
title_short Difference of Critical Shoulder Angle (CSA) According to Minimal Rotation: Can Minimal Rotation of the Scapula Be Allowed in the Evaluation of CSA?
title_sort difference of critical shoulder angle (csa) according to minimal rotation: can minimal rotation of the scapula be allowed in the evaluation of csa?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6695323/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31475052
http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/cios.2019.11.3.309
work_keys_str_mv AT kimjunghan differenceofcriticalshoulderanglecsaaccordingtominimalrotationcanminimalrotationofthescapulabeallowedintheevaluationofcsa
AT gwakheuichul differenceofcriticalshoulderanglecsaaccordingtominimalrotationcanminimalrotationofthescapulabeallowedintheevaluationofcsa
AT kimchangwan differenceofcriticalshoulderanglecsaaccordingtominimalrotationcanminimalrotationofthescapulabeallowedintheevaluationofcsa
AT leechangrack differenceofcriticalshoulderanglecsaaccordingtominimalrotationcanminimalrotationofthescapulabeallowedintheevaluationofcsa
AT kwonyonguk differenceofcriticalshoulderanglecsaaccordingtominimalrotationcanminimalrotationofthescapulabeallowedintheevaluationofcsa
AT seohyeongwon differenceofcriticalshoulderanglecsaaccordingtominimalrotationcanminimalrotationofthescapulabeallowedintheevaluationofcsa