Cargando…

The role of the refractory period in diapause length determination in a freshwater crustacean

We investigate here the mechanism of allochronic resumption of development by the dormant forms in organisms inhabiting temporary habitats. The cohorts of resting eggs of a short living freshwater crustacean Daphnia magna collected in two temporary waters at two occasions (spring and autumn) were ex...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ślusarczyk, Mirosław, Chlebicki, Wojciech, Pijanowska, Joanna, Radzikowski, Jacek
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6695402/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31417146
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-48389-6
_version_ 1783444031369379840
author Ślusarczyk, Mirosław
Chlebicki, Wojciech
Pijanowska, Joanna
Radzikowski, Jacek
author_facet Ślusarczyk, Mirosław
Chlebicki, Wojciech
Pijanowska, Joanna
Radzikowski, Jacek
author_sort Ślusarczyk, Mirosław
collection PubMed
description We investigate here the mechanism of allochronic resumption of development by the dormant forms in organisms inhabiting temporary habitats. The cohorts of resting eggs of a short living freshwater crustacean Daphnia magna collected in two temporary waters at two occasions (spring and autumn) were exposed after different storage periods (0–16 weeks) spent either in wet or dry conditions to a given set of hatching stimuli announcing appearance of favourable conditions. Freshly formed resting eggs did not hatch or hatched occasionally. The resting eggs formed in autumn hatched more eagerly than the spring ones when exposed to favourable conditions after wet storage. The hatching proportion increased linearly up to 68–82% in autumn resting eggs while to 33–44% in the spring ones over 16 weeks of storage that might have covered several generations of the active forms. Dry storage of the resting eggs reduced their hatching proportion considerably. We suspect that the length variation of a refractory period (initial phase of developmental arrest when resting forms remain insensitive to hatching stimuli) followed by a reactivation period may constitute the simplest two-step physiological mechanism allowing staggering revival of the dormant forms in subsequent generations that maximise chances for survival in unpredictably changing habitats.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6695402
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66954022019-08-19 The role of the refractory period in diapause length determination in a freshwater crustacean Ślusarczyk, Mirosław Chlebicki, Wojciech Pijanowska, Joanna Radzikowski, Jacek Sci Rep Article We investigate here the mechanism of allochronic resumption of development by the dormant forms in organisms inhabiting temporary habitats. The cohorts of resting eggs of a short living freshwater crustacean Daphnia magna collected in two temporary waters at two occasions (spring and autumn) were exposed after different storage periods (0–16 weeks) spent either in wet or dry conditions to a given set of hatching stimuli announcing appearance of favourable conditions. Freshly formed resting eggs did not hatch or hatched occasionally. The resting eggs formed in autumn hatched more eagerly than the spring ones when exposed to favourable conditions after wet storage. The hatching proportion increased linearly up to 68–82% in autumn resting eggs while to 33–44% in the spring ones over 16 weeks of storage that might have covered several generations of the active forms. Dry storage of the resting eggs reduced their hatching proportion considerably. We suspect that the length variation of a refractory period (initial phase of developmental arrest when resting forms remain insensitive to hatching stimuli) followed by a reactivation period may constitute the simplest two-step physiological mechanism allowing staggering revival of the dormant forms in subsequent generations that maximise chances for survival in unpredictably changing habitats. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6695402/ /pubmed/31417146 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-48389-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Ślusarczyk, Mirosław
Chlebicki, Wojciech
Pijanowska, Joanna
Radzikowski, Jacek
The role of the refractory period in diapause length determination in a freshwater crustacean
title The role of the refractory period in diapause length determination in a freshwater crustacean
title_full The role of the refractory period in diapause length determination in a freshwater crustacean
title_fullStr The role of the refractory period in diapause length determination in a freshwater crustacean
title_full_unstemmed The role of the refractory period in diapause length determination in a freshwater crustacean
title_short The role of the refractory period in diapause length determination in a freshwater crustacean
title_sort role of the refractory period in diapause length determination in a freshwater crustacean
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6695402/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31417146
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-48389-6
work_keys_str_mv AT slusarczykmirosław theroleoftherefractoryperiodindiapauselengthdeterminationinafreshwatercrustacean
AT chlebickiwojciech theroleoftherefractoryperiodindiapauselengthdeterminationinafreshwatercrustacean
AT pijanowskajoanna theroleoftherefractoryperiodindiapauselengthdeterminationinafreshwatercrustacean
AT radzikowskijacek theroleoftherefractoryperiodindiapauselengthdeterminationinafreshwatercrustacean
AT slusarczykmirosław roleoftherefractoryperiodindiapauselengthdeterminationinafreshwatercrustacean
AT chlebickiwojciech roleoftherefractoryperiodindiapauselengthdeterminationinafreshwatercrustacean
AT pijanowskajoanna roleoftherefractoryperiodindiapauselengthdeterminationinafreshwatercrustacean
AT radzikowskijacek roleoftherefractoryperiodindiapauselengthdeterminationinafreshwatercrustacean