Cargando…
A Human Clinical and Histomorphometrical Study on Different Resorbable and Non-Resorbable Bone Substitutes Used in Post-Extractive Sites. Preliminary Results
Background: The healing of sockets following teeth extraction results in a marked reduction of the height and width of the ridge. This in vivo study aims to assess and compare the efficacy of calcium sulphate (CS) and sintered nano-hydroxyapatite (NHA) in postextraction sockets. Materials and Method...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6695925/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31357726 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12152408 |
_version_ | 1783444149407580160 |
---|---|
author | De Tullio, Ilaria Caputi, Sergio Perfetti, Giorgio Mavriqi, Luan Wismeijer, Daniel Traini, Tonino |
author_facet | De Tullio, Ilaria Caputi, Sergio Perfetti, Giorgio Mavriqi, Luan Wismeijer, Daniel Traini, Tonino |
author_sort | De Tullio, Ilaria |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: The healing of sockets following teeth extraction results in a marked reduction of the height and width of the ridge. This in vivo study aims to assess and compare the efficacy of calcium sulphate (CS) and sintered nano-hydroxyapatite (NHA) in postextraction sockets. Materials and Methods: 10 subjects were enrolled for single or multiple tooth extraction and implant placement. Each site was randomly assigned to one of four groups and filled with CS, NHA, a combination of CS and NHA, or left to normal healing. After five months tissue samples were harvested from the extraction sites and prepared for histological investigations. Results: Histomorphometric analysis showed that the average percentages of vital bone was 13.56% ± 13.08% for CS, 17.84% ± 7.32% for NHA, 58.72% ± 8.77% for CS + NHA%, and 80.68% ± 21.8% for the controls; for the connective tissue the results were 33.25% ± 35.75% for CS, 55.88% ± 21.86% for NHA, 17.34% ± 8.51% for CS + NHA, and 22.62% ± 0.52% for the controls; for residual biomaterial the results were 0.56% ± 0.52% for CS group, 21.97% ± 0.79% for NHA, and 47.54% ± 20.13% for CS + NHA. Conclusions: Both biomaterials led to bone tissue formation after five months of healing. The combination of the biomaterials presented a better behavior when compared to the individual application. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6695925 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66959252019-09-05 A Human Clinical and Histomorphometrical Study on Different Resorbable and Non-Resorbable Bone Substitutes Used in Post-Extractive Sites. Preliminary Results De Tullio, Ilaria Caputi, Sergio Perfetti, Giorgio Mavriqi, Luan Wismeijer, Daniel Traini, Tonino Materials (Basel) Article Background: The healing of sockets following teeth extraction results in a marked reduction of the height and width of the ridge. This in vivo study aims to assess and compare the efficacy of calcium sulphate (CS) and sintered nano-hydroxyapatite (NHA) in postextraction sockets. Materials and Methods: 10 subjects were enrolled for single or multiple tooth extraction and implant placement. Each site was randomly assigned to one of four groups and filled with CS, NHA, a combination of CS and NHA, or left to normal healing. After five months tissue samples were harvested from the extraction sites and prepared for histological investigations. Results: Histomorphometric analysis showed that the average percentages of vital bone was 13.56% ± 13.08% for CS, 17.84% ± 7.32% for NHA, 58.72% ± 8.77% for CS + NHA%, and 80.68% ± 21.8% for the controls; for the connective tissue the results were 33.25% ± 35.75% for CS, 55.88% ± 21.86% for NHA, 17.34% ± 8.51% for CS + NHA, and 22.62% ± 0.52% for the controls; for residual biomaterial the results were 0.56% ± 0.52% for CS group, 21.97% ± 0.79% for NHA, and 47.54% ± 20.13% for CS + NHA. Conclusions: Both biomaterials led to bone tissue formation after five months of healing. The combination of the biomaterials presented a better behavior when compared to the individual application. MDPI 2019-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6695925/ /pubmed/31357726 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12152408 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article De Tullio, Ilaria Caputi, Sergio Perfetti, Giorgio Mavriqi, Luan Wismeijer, Daniel Traini, Tonino A Human Clinical and Histomorphometrical Study on Different Resorbable and Non-Resorbable Bone Substitutes Used in Post-Extractive Sites. Preliminary Results |
title | A Human Clinical and Histomorphometrical Study on Different Resorbable and Non-Resorbable Bone Substitutes Used in Post-Extractive Sites. Preliminary Results |
title_full | A Human Clinical and Histomorphometrical Study on Different Resorbable and Non-Resorbable Bone Substitutes Used in Post-Extractive Sites. Preliminary Results |
title_fullStr | A Human Clinical and Histomorphometrical Study on Different Resorbable and Non-Resorbable Bone Substitutes Used in Post-Extractive Sites. Preliminary Results |
title_full_unstemmed | A Human Clinical and Histomorphometrical Study on Different Resorbable and Non-Resorbable Bone Substitutes Used in Post-Extractive Sites. Preliminary Results |
title_short | A Human Clinical and Histomorphometrical Study on Different Resorbable and Non-Resorbable Bone Substitutes Used in Post-Extractive Sites. Preliminary Results |
title_sort | human clinical and histomorphometrical study on different resorbable and non-resorbable bone substitutes used in post-extractive sites. preliminary results |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6695925/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31357726 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12152408 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT detullioilaria ahumanclinicalandhistomorphometricalstudyondifferentresorbableandnonresorbablebonesubstitutesusedinpostextractivesitespreliminaryresults AT caputisergio ahumanclinicalandhistomorphometricalstudyondifferentresorbableandnonresorbablebonesubstitutesusedinpostextractivesitespreliminaryresults AT perfettigiorgio ahumanclinicalandhistomorphometricalstudyondifferentresorbableandnonresorbablebonesubstitutesusedinpostextractivesitespreliminaryresults AT mavriqiluan ahumanclinicalandhistomorphometricalstudyondifferentresorbableandnonresorbablebonesubstitutesusedinpostextractivesitespreliminaryresults AT wismeijerdaniel ahumanclinicalandhistomorphometricalstudyondifferentresorbableandnonresorbablebonesubstitutesusedinpostextractivesitespreliminaryresults AT trainitonino ahumanclinicalandhistomorphometricalstudyondifferentresorbableandnonresorbablebonesubstitutesusedinpostextractivesitespreliminaryresults AT detullioilaria humanclinicalandhistomorphometricalstudyondifferentresorbableandnonresorbablebonesubstitutesusedinpostextractivesitespreliminaryresults AT caputisergio humanclinicalandhistomorphometricalstudyondifferentresorbableandnonresorbablebonesubstitutesusedinpostextractivesitespreliminaryresults AT perfettigiorgio humanclinicalandhistomorphometricalstudyondifferentresorbableandnonresorbablebonesubstitutesusedinpostextractivesitespreliminaryresults AT mavriqiluan humanclinicalandhistomorphometricalstudyondifferentresorbableandnonresorbablebonesubstitutesusedinpostextractivesitespreliminaryresults AT wismeijerdaniel humanclinicalandhistomorphometricalstudyondifferentresorbableandnonresorbablebonesubstitutesusedinpostextractivesitespreliminaryresults AT trainitonino humanclinicalandhistomorphometricalstudyondifferentresorbableandnonresorbablebonesubstitutesusedinpostextractivesitespreliminaryresults |