Cargando…

Workplace-Based Exercise Intervention Improves Work Ability in Office Workers: A Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial

Neck pain is a burden to employers and employees amenable to improvement with neck/shoulder strengthening exercises. However, the benefits of such interventions on office workers’ work ability remains unknown. This study evaluated the effects of a 12-week combined ergonomics and neck/shoulder streng...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ting, Joshua Zheng Rui, Chen, Xiaoqi, Johnston, Venerina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6696298/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31344787
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16152633
_version_ 1783444237665173504
author Ting, Joshua Zheng Rui
Chen, Xiaoqi
Johnston, Venerina
author_facet Ting, Joshua Zheng Rui
Chen, Xiaoqi
Johnston, Venerina
author_sort Ting, Joshua Zheng Rui
collection PubMed
description Neck pain is a burden to employers and employees amenable to improvement with neck/shoulder strengthening exercises. However, the benefits of such interventions on office workers’ work ability remains unknown. This study evaluated the effects of a 12-week combined ergonomics and neck/shoulder strengthening exercise intervention (EET, n = 177, mean age 41.7 years, 26% female), versus a 12-week combined ergonomics and health promotion intervention (EHP, n = 173, mean age 43 years, 29% female) on work ability among office workers. Work ability was measured by a single question. Differences in the work ability score were analyzed using the intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (i.e., adherence ≥70%) analyses for between- and within-group differences at baseline, 12 weeks, and 12 months. A sub-group analysis was performed for neck cases, defined as reporting neck pain as ≥3 (out of 10). No significant between-group differences for work ability were observed in the general population, and subgroup of neck cases. A significant group-by-time interaction effect at 12 weeks and the trend for significance at 12 months favored the EET group in the per-protocol analysis of the neck cases. EET was effective in increasing work ability post-intervention and potentially, in the long-term, in symptomatic participants with ≥70% adherence to the intervention. However, EET was not superior to EHP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6696298
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66962982019-09-05 Workplace-Based Exercise Intervention Improves Work Ability in Office Workers: A Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial Ting, Joshua Zheng Rui Chen, Xiaoqi Johnston, Venerina Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Neck pain is a burden to employers and employees amenable to improvement with neck/shoulder strengthening exercises. However, the benefits of such interventions on office workers’ work ability remains unknown. This study evaluated the effects of a 12-week combined ergonomics and neck/shoulder strengthening exercise intervention (EET, n = 177, mean age 41.7 years, 26% female), versus a 12-week combined ergonomics and health promotion intervention (EHP, n = 173, mean age 43 years, 29% female) on work ability among office workers. Work ability was measured by a single question. Differences in the work ability score were analyzed using the intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (i.e., adherence ≥70%) analyses for between- and within-group differences at baseline, 12 weeks, and 12 months. A sub-group analysis was performed for neck cases, defined as reporting neck pain as ≥3 (out of 10). No significant between-group differences for work ability were observed in the general population, and subgroup of neck cases. A significant group-by-time interaction effect at 12 weeks and the trend for significance at 12 months favored the EET group in the per-protocol analysis of the neck cases. EET was effective in increasing work ability post-intervention and potentially, in the long-term, in symptomatic participants with ≥70% adherence to the intervention. However, EET was not superior to EHP. MDPI 2019-07-24 2019-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6696298/ /pubmed/31344787 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16152633 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ting, Joshua Zheng Rui
Chen, Xiaoqi
Johnston, Venerina
Workplace-Based Exercise Intervention Improves Work Ability in Office Workers: A Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial
title Workplace-Based Exercise Intervention Improves Work Ability in Office Workers: A Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial
title_full Workplace-Based Exercise Intervention Improves Work Ability in Office Workers: A Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Workplace-Based Exercise Intervention Improves Work Ability in Office Workers: A Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Workplace-Based Exercise Intervention Improves Work Ability in Office Workers: A Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial
title_short Workplace-Based Exercise Intervention Improves Work Ability in Office Workers: A Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial
title_sort workplace-based exercise intervention improves work ability in office workers: a cluster randomised controlled trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6696298/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31344787
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16152633
work_keys_str_mv AT tingjoshuazhengrui workplacebasedexerciseinterventionimprovesworkabilityinofficeworkersaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT chenxiaoqi workplacebasedexerciseinterventionimprovesworkabilityinofficeworkersaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT johnstonvenerina workplacebasedexerciseinterventionimprovesworkabilityinofficeworkersaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial