Cargando…
Experimental Verification and Comparative Analysis of Equivalent Methods on Metal’s Fixed Joint Interface
In order to effectively improve the dynamic characteristics of the fixed metal joint interface, it is important to establish a correct equivalent model of the metal joint interface. In this paper, three equivalent methods for simulating the metal joint interface are analyzed, including the virtual m...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6696417/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31357399 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12152381 |
_version_ | 1783444265621258240 |
---|---|
author | Han, Renxiu Li, Guoxi Gong, Jingzhong Zhang, Meng Zhang, Kai |
author_facet | Han, Renxiu Li, Guoxi Gong, Jingzhong Zhang, Meng Zhang, Kai |
author_sort | Han, Renxiu |
collection | PubMed |
description | In order to effectively improve the dynamic characteristics of the fixed metal joint interface, it is important to establish a correct equivalent model of the metal joint interface. In this paper, three equivalent methods for simulating the metal joint interface are analyzed, including the virtual material method, spring damping method, finite element method, and verification by modal experiment. First, according to the contact mechanics model of the constructed metal joint interface, the physical properties of the three-dimensional models of the fixed joint interface are assigned in the ANSYS software. Then, three methods are used for the modal analysis and compared with a modal experiment. The results show that the modal shapes of the three theoretical methods are consistent with those of the experimental modes. The first five natural frequencies obtained by the virtual material method are closest to the experimental natural frequencies, and the errors are within 10%. The errors of the other two methods are between 9% and 39%. Therefore, the virtual material method is a better equivalent method of the metal joint interface. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6696417 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66964172019-09-05 Experimental Verification and Comparative Analysis of Equivalent Methods on Metal’s Fixed Joint Interface Han, Renxiu Li, Guoxi Gong, Jingzhong Zhang, Meng Zhang, Kai Materials (Basel) Article In order to effectively improve the dynamic characteristics of the fixed metal joint interface, it is important to establish a correct equivalent model of the metal joint interface. In this paper, three equivalent methods for simulating the metal joint interface are analyzed, including the virtual material method, spring damping method, finite element method, and verification by modal experiment. First, according to the contact mechanics model of the constructed metal joint interface, the physical properties of the three-dimensional models of the fixed joint interface are assigned in the ANSYS software. Then, three methods are used for the modal analysis and compared with a modal experiment. The results show that the modal shapes of the three theoretical methods are consistent with those of the experimental modes. The first five natural frequencies obtained by the virtual material method are closest to the experimental natural frequencies, and the errors are within 10%. The errors of the other two methods are between 9% and 39%. Therefore, the virtual material method is a better equivalent method of the metal joint interface. MDPI 2019-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6696417/ /pubmed/31357399 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12152381 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Han, Renxiu Li, Guoxi Gong, Jingzhong Zhang, Meng Zhang, Kai Experimental Verification and Comparative Analysis of Equivalent Methods on Metal’s Fixed Joint Interface |
title | Experimental Verification and Comparative Analysis of Equivalent Methods on Metal’s Fixed Joint Interface |
title_full | Experimental Verification and Comparative Analysis of Equivalent Methods on Metal’s Fixed Joint Interface |
title_fullStr | Experimental Verification and Comparative Analysis of Equivalent Methods on Metal’s Fixed Joint Interface |
title_full_unstemmed | Experimental Verification and Comparative Analysis of Equivalent Methods on Metal’s Fixed Joint Interface |
title_short | Experimental Verification and Comparative Analysis of Equivalent Methods on Metal’s Fixed Joint Interface |
title_sort | experimental verification and comparative analysis of equivalent methods on metal’s fixed joint interface |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6696417/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31357399 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12152381 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hanrenxiu experimentalverificationandcomparativeanalysisofequivalentmethodsonmetalsfixedjointinterface AT liguoxi experimentalverificationandcomparativeanalysisofequivalentmethodsonmetalsfixedjointinterface AT gongjingzhong experimentalverificationandcomparativeanalysisofequivalentmethodsonmetalsfixedjointinterface AT zhangmeng experimentalverificationandcomparativeanalysisofequivalentmethodsonmetalsfixedjointinterface AT zhangkai experimentalverificationandcomparativeanalysisofequivalentmethodsonmetalsfixedjointinterface |