Cargando…

Experimental Verification and Comparative Analysis of Equivalent Methods on Metal’s Fixed Joint Interface

In order to effectively improve the dynamic characteristics of the fixed metal joint interface, it is important to establish a correct equivalent model of the metal joint interface. In this paper, three equivalent methods for simulating the metal joint interface are analyzed, including the virtual m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Han, Renxiu, Li, Guoxi, Gong, Jingzhong, Zhang, Meng, Zhang, Kai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6696417/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31357399
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12152381
_version_ 1783444265621258240
author Han, Renxiu
Li, Guoxi
Gong, Jingzhong
Zhang, Meng
Zhang, Kai
author_facet Han, Renxiu
Li, Guoxi
Gong, Jingzhong
Zhang, Meng
Zhang, Kai
author_sort Han, Renxiu
collection PubMed
description In order to effectively improve the dynamic characteristics of the fixed metal joint interface, it is important to establish a correct equivalent model of the metal joint interface. In this paper, three equivalent methods for simulating the metal joint interface are analyzed, including the virtual material method, spring damping method, finite element method, and verification by modal experiment. First, according to the contact mechanics model of the constructed metal joint interface, the physical properties of the three-dimensional models of the fixed joint interface are assigned in the ANSYS software. Then, three methods are used for the modal analysis and compared with a modal experiment. The results show that the modal shapes of the three theoretical methods are consistent with those of the experimental modes. The first five natural frequencies obtained by the virtual material method are closest to the experimental natural frequencies, and the errors are within 10%. The errors of the other two methods are between 9% and 39%. Therefore, the virtual material method is a better equivalent method of the metal joint interface.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6696417
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66964172019-09-05 Experimental Verification and Comparative Analysis of Equivalent Methods on Metal’s Fixed Joint Interface Han, Renxiu Li, Guoxi Gong, Jingzhong Zhang, Meng Zhang, Kai Materials (Basel) Article In order to effectively improve the dynamic characteristics of the fixed metal joint interface, it is important to establish a correct equivalent model of the metal joint interface. In this paper, three equivalent methods for simulating the metal joint interface are analyzed, including the virtual material method, spring damping method, finite element method, and verification by modal experiment. First, according to the contact mechanics model of the constructed metal joint interface, the physical properties of the three-dimensional models of the fixed joint interface are assigned in the ANSYS software. Then, three methods are used for the modal analysis and compared with a modal experiment. The results show that the modal shapes of the three theoretical methods are consistent with those of the experimental modes. The first five natural frequencies obtained by the virtual material method are closest to the experimental natural frequencies, and the errors are within 10%. The errors of the other two methods are between 9% and 39%. Therefore, the virtual material method is a better equivalent method of the metal joint interface. MDPI 2019-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6696417/ /pubmed/31357399 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12152381 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Han, Renxiu
Li, Guoxi
Gong, Jingzhong
Zhang, Meng
Zhang, Kai
Experimental Verification and Comparative Analysis of Equivalent Methods on Metal’s Fixed Joint Interface
title Experimental Verification and Comparative Analysis of Equivalent Methods on Metal’s Fixed Joint Interface
title_full Experimental Verification and Comparative Analysis of Equivalent Methods on Metal’s Fixed Joint Interface
title_fullStr Experimental Verification and Comparative Analysis of Equivalent Methods on Metal’s Fixed Joint Interface
title_full_unstemmed Experimental Verification and Comparative Analysis of Equivalent Methods on Metal’s Fixed Joint Interface
title_short Experimental Verification and Comparative Analysis of Equivalent Methods on Metal’s Fixed Joint Interface
title_sort experimental verification and comparative analysis of equivalent methods on metal’s fixed joint interface
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6696417/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31357399
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12152381
work_keys_str_mv AT hanrenxiu experimentalverificationandcomparativeanalysisofequivalentmethodsonmetalsfixedjointinterface
AT liguoxi experimentalverificationandcomparativeanalysisofequivalentmethodsonmetalsfixedjointinterface
AT gongjingzhong experimentalverificationandcomparativeanalysisofequivalentmethodsonmetalsfixedjointinterface
AT zhangmeng experimentalverificationandcomparativeanalysisofequivalentmethodsonmetalsfixedjointinterface
AT zhangkai experimentalverificationandcomparativeanalysisofequivalentmethodsonmetalsfixedjointinterface