Cargando…

Critical care information display approaches and design frameworks: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review original user evaluations of patient information displays relevant to critical care and understand the impact of design frameworks and information presentation approaches on decision-making, efficiency, workload, and preferences of clinicians. METHODS: We included...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wright, Melanie C., Borbolla, Damian, Waller, Rosalie G., Del Fiol, Guilherme, Reese, Thomas, Nesbitt, Paige, Segall, Noa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6696941/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31423485
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yjbinx.2019.100041
_version_ 1783444350119706624
author Wright, Melanie C.
Borbolla, Damian
Waller, Rosalie G.
Del Fiol, Guilherme
Reese, Thomas
Nesbitt, Paige
Segall, Noa
author_facet Wright, Melanie C.
Borbolla, Damian
Waller, Rosalie G.
Del Fiol, Guilherme
Reese, Thomas
Nesbitt, Paige
Segall, Noa
author_sort Wright, Melanie C.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To systematically review original user evaluations of patient information displays relevant to critical care and understand the impact of design frameworks and information presentation approaches on decision-making, efficiency, workload, and preferences of clinicians. METHODS: We included studies that evaluated information displays designed to support real-time care decisions in critical care or anesthesiology using simulated tasks. We searched PubMed and IEEExplore from 1/1/1990 to 6/30/2018. The search strategy was developed iteratively with calibration against known references. Inclusion screening was completed independently by two authors. Extraction of display features, design processes, and evaluation method was completed by one and verified by a second author. RESULTS: Fifty-six manuscripts evaluating 32 critical care and 22 anesthesia displays were included. Primary outcome metrics included clinician accuracy and efficiency in recognizing, diagnosing, and treating problems. Implementing user-centered design (UCD) processes, especially iterative evaluation and redesign, resulted in positive impact in outcomes such as accuracy and efficiency. Innovative display approaches that led to improved human-system performance in critical care included: (1) improving the integration and organization of information, (2) improving the representation of trend information, and (3) implementing graphical approaches to make relationships between data visible. CONCLUSION: Our review affirms the value of key principles of UCD. Improved information presentation can facilitate faster information interpretation and more accurate diagnoses and treatment. Improvements to information organization and support for rapid interpretation of time-based relationships between related quantitative data is warranted. Designers and developers are encouraged to involve users in formal iterative design and evaluation activities in the design of electronic health records (EHRs), clinical informatics applications, and clinical devices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6696941
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66969412019-09-01 Critical care information display approaches and design frameworks: A systematic review and meta-analysis Wright, Melanie C. Borbolla, Damian Waller, Rosalie G. Del Fiol, Guilherme Reese, Thomas Nesbitt, Paige Segall, Noa J Biomed Inform X Article OBJECTIVE: To systematically review original user evaluations of patient information displays relevant to critical care and understand the impact of design frameworks and information presentation approaches on decision-making, efficiency, workload, and preferences of clinicians. METHODS: We included studies that evaluated information displays designed to support real-time care decisions in critical care or anesthesiology using simulated tasks. We searched PubMed and IEEExplore from 1/1/1990 to 6/30/2018. The search strategy was developed iteratively with calibration against known references. Inclusion screening was completed independently by two authors. Extraction of display features, design processes, and evaluation method was completed by one and verified by a second author. RESULTS: Fifty-six manuscripts evaluating 32 critical care and 22 anesthesia displays were included. Primary outcome metrics included clinician accuracy and efficiency in recognizing, diagnosing, and treating problems. Implementing user-centered design (UCD) processes, especially iterative evaluation and redesign, resulted in positive impact in outcomes such as accuracy and efficiency. Innovative display approaches that led to improved human-system performance in critical care included: (1) improving the integration and organization of information, (2) improving the representation of trend information, and (3) implementing graphical approaches to make relationships between data visible. CONCLUSION: Our review affirms the value of key principles of UCD. Improved information presentation can facilitate faster information interpretation and more accurate diagnoses and treatment. Improvements to information organization and support for rapid interpretation of time-based relationships between related quantitative data is warranted. Designers and developers are encouraged to involve users in formal iterative design and evaluation activities in the design of electronic health records (EHRs), clinical informatics applications, and clinical devices. 2019-06-22 2019-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6696941/ /pubmed/31423485 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yjbinx.2019.100041 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/BY-NC-ND/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Article
Wright, Melanie C.
Borbolla, Damian
Waller, Rosalie G.
Del Fiol, Guilherme
Reese, Thomas
Nesbitt, Paige
Segall, Noa
Critical care information display approaches and design frameworks: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Critical care information display approaches and design frameworks: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Critical care information display approaches and design frameworks: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Critical care information display approaches and design frameworks: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Critical care information display approaches and design frameworks: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Critical care information display approaches and design frameworks: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort critical care information display approaches and design frameworks: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6696941/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31423485
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yjbinx.2019.100041
work_keys_str_mv AT wrightmelaniec criticalcareinformationdisplayapproachesanddesignframeworksasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT borbolladamian criticalcareinformationdisplayapproachesanddesignframeworksasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wallerrosalieg criticalcareinformationdisplayapproachesanddesignframeworksasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT delfiolguilherme criticalcareinformationdisplayapproachesanddesignframeworksasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT reesethomas criticalcareinformationdisplayapproachesanddesignframeworksasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT nesbittpaige criticalcareinformationdisplayapproachesanddesignframeworksasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT segallnoa criticalcareinformationdisplayapproachesanddesignframeworksasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis