Cargando…

An In-vitro Comparison of the Shear Bond Strength of Three Different Composite Materials with Three Different Etchants for the Bonding of Orthodontic Brackets

Introduction Esthetics, being the major concern of today’s treatments, has led to numerous innovations, including composites, for different treatment options. Esthetic orthodontics requires the use of composites for bonding orthodontic brackets to the teeth. Aims To identify which combination of com...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Megh, Sharat, Rao, VV, Minor Babu, MS, R., Punithavathy, Satyam, Martha, Pallepati, Akhil, Mythraiye, Raparla, Paravada, Chandrika
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6697457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31431848
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.4944
_version_ 1783444389037604864
author Megh, Sharat
Rao, VV
Minor Babu, MS
R., Punithavathy
Satyam, Martha
Pallepati, Akhil
Mythraiye, Raparla
Paravada, Chandrika
author_facet Megh, Sharat
Rao, VV
Minor Babu, MS
R., Punithavathy
Satyam, Martha
Pallepati, Akhil
Mythraiye, Raparla
Paravada, Chandrika
author_sort Megh, Sharat
collection PubMed
description Introduction Esthetics, being the major concern of today’s treatments, has led to numerous innovations, including composites, for different treatment options. Esthetic orthodontics requires the use of composites for bonding orthodontic brackets to the teeth. Aims To identify which combination of composites has the highest shear bond strength at the tooth-bracket interface. Materials and methods Three different composite kits were selected for each group (n=42) and were further divided into three subgroups (n=14), where the bonding agents and/or primer were interchanged to find the best combination. Results Sub-group B2 (Orthofix + Eazetch + Universal Bond) showed the highest shear bond strength (10.74 ± 3.45 MPa), which was highly significant at p =/<0.0001. Conclusion The highest shear bond strength was found with the combination of 37% phosphoric acid (Eazetch), GC Universal Bond (GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan), and Orthofix composite material (Anabond Stedman, Chennai, India). As this study is an in-vitro study, we need longitudinal in-vivo studies to establish the best combination for the bonding of orthodontic brackets.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6697457
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66974572019-08-20 An In-vitro Comparison of the Shear Bond Strength of Three Different Composite Materials with Three Different Etchants for the Bonding of Orthodontic Brackets Megh, Sharat Rao, VV Minor Babu, MS R., Punithavathy Satyam, Martha Pallepati, Akhil Mythraiye, Raparla Paravada, Chandrika Cureus Miscellaneous Introduction Esthetics, being the major concern of today’s treatments, has led to numerous innovations, including composites, for different treatment options. Esthetic orthodontics requires the use of composites for bonding orthodontic brackets to the teeth. Aims To identify which combination of composites has the highest shear bond strength at the tooth-bracket interface. Materials and methods Three different composite kits were selected for each group (n=42) and were further divided into three subgroups (n=14), where the bonding agents and/or primer were interchanged to find the best combination. Results Sub-group B2 (Orthofix + Eazetch + Universal Bond) showed the highest shear bond strength (10.74 ± 3.45 MPa), which was highly significant at p =/<0.0001. Conclusion The highest shear bond strength was found with the combination of 37% phosphoric acid (Eazetch), GC Universal Bond (GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan), and Orthofix composite material (Anabond Stedman, Chennai, India). As this study is an in-vitro study, we need longitudinal in-vivo studies to establish the best combination for the bonding of orthodontic brackets. Cureus 2019-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6697457/ /pubmed/31431848 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.4944 Text en Copyright © 2019, Megh et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Miscellaneous
Megh, Sharat
Rao, VV
Minor Babu, MS
R., Punithavathy
Satyam, Martha
Pallepati, Akhil
Mythraiye, Raparla
Paravada, Chandrika
An In-vitro Comparison of the Shear Bond Strength of Three Different Composite Materials with Three Different Etchants for the Bonding of Orthodontic Brackets
title An In-vitro Comparison of the Shear Bond Strength of Three Different Composite Materials with Three Different Etchants for the Bonding of Orthodontic Brackets
title_full An In-vitro Comparison of the Shear Bond Strength of Three Different Composite Materials with Three Different Etchants for the Bonding of Orthodontic Brackets
title_fullStr An In-vitro Comparison of the Shear Bond Strength of Three Different Composite Materials with Three Different Etchants for the Bonding of Orthodontic Brackets
title_full_unstemmed An In-vitro Comparison of the Shear Bond Strength of Three Different Composite Materials with Three Different Etchants for the Bonding of Orthodontic Brackets
title_short An In-vitro Comparison of the Shear Bond Strength of Three Different Composite Materials with Three Different Etchants for the Bonding of Orthodontic Brackets
title_sort in-vitro comparison of the shear bond strength of three different composite materials with three different etchants for the bonding of orthodontic brackets
topic Miscellaneous
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6697457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31431848
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.4944
work_keys_str_mv AT meghsharat aninvitrocomparisonoftheshearbondstrengthofthreedifferentcompositematerialswiththreedifferentetchantsforthebondingoforthodonticbrackets
AT raovv aninvitrocomparisonoftheshearbondstrengthofthreedifferentcompositematerialswiththreedifferentetchantsforthebondingoforthodonticbrackets
AT minorbabums aninvitrocomparisonoftheshearbondstrengthofthreedifferentcompositematerialswiththreedifferentetchantsforthebondingoforthodonticbrackets
AT rpunithavathy aninvitrocomparisonoftheshearbondstrengthofthreedifferentcompositematerialswiththreedifferentetchantsforthebondingoforthodonticbrackets
AT satyammartha aninvitrocomparisonoftheshearbondstrengthofthreedifferentcompositematerialswiththreedifferentetchantsforthebondingoforthodonticbrackets
AT pallepatiakhil aninvitrocomparisonoftheshearbondstrengthofthreedifferentcompositematerialswiththreedifferentetchantsforthebondingoforthodonticbrackets
AT mythraiyeraparla aninvitrocomparisonoftheshearbondstrengthofthreedifferentcompositematerialswiththreedifferentetchantsforthebondingoforthodonticbrackets
AT paravadachandrika aninvitrocomparisonoftheshearbondstrengthofthreedifferentcompositematerialswiththreedifferentetchantsforthebondingoforthodonticbrackets
AT meghsharat invitrocomparisonoftheshearbondstrengthofthreedifferentcompositematerialswiththreedifferentetchantsforthebondingoforthodonticbrackets
AT raovv invitrocomparisonoftheshearbondstrengthofthreedifferentcompositematerialswiththreedifferentetchantsforthebondingoforthodonticbrackets
AT minorbabums invitrocomparisonoftheshearbondstrengthofthreedifferentcompositematerialswiththreedifferentetchantsforthebondingoforthodonticbrackets
AT rpunithavathy invitrocomparisonoftheshearbondstrengthofthreedifferentcompositematerialswiththreedifferentetchantsforthebondingoforthodonticbrackets
AT satyammartha invitrocomparisonoftheshearbondstrengthofthreedifferentcompositematerialswiththreedifferentetchantsforthebondingoforthodonticbrackets
AT pallepatiakhil invitrocomparisonoftheshearbondstrengthofthreedifferentcompositematerialswiththreedifferentetchantsforthebondingoforthodonticbrackets
AT mythraiyeraparla invitrocomparisonoftheshearbondstrengthofthreedifferentcompositematerialswiththreedifferentetchantsforthebondingoforthodonticbrackets
AT paravadachandrika invitrocomparisonoftheshearbondstrengthofthreedifferentcompositematerialswiththreedifferentetchantsforthebondingoforthodonticbrackets