Cargando…

Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: Weighing the Accomplishments, Hype, and Promise

Introduction : Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (AIM) research is now 50 years old, having made great progress that has tracked the corresponding evolution of computer science, hardware technology, communications, and biomedicine. Characterized as being in its “adolescence” at an international me...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Shortliffe, Edward H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2019
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6697517/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31022745
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1677891
_version_ 1783444398515683328
author Shortliffe, Edward H.
author_facet Shortliffe, Edward H.
author_sort Shortliffe, Edward H.
collection PubMed
description Introduction : Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (AIM) research is now 50 years old, having made great progress that has tracked the corresponding evolution of computer science, hardware technology, communications, and biomedicine. Characterized as being in its “adolescence” at an international meeting in 1991, and as “coming of age” at another meeting in 2007, the AIM field is now more visible and influential than ever before, paralleling the enthusiasm and accomplishments of artificial intelligence (AI) more generally. Objectives : This article summarizes some of that AIM history, providing an update on the status of the field as it enters its second half-century. It acknowledges the failure of AI, including AIM, to live up to early predictions of its likely capabilities and impact. Methods : The paper reviews and assesses the early history of the AIM field, referring to the conclusions of papers based on the meetings in 1991 and 2007, and analyzing the subsequent evolution of AIM. Conclusion : We must be cautious in assessing the speed at which further progress will be made, despite today’s wild predictions in the press and large investments by industry, including in health care. The inherent complexity of medicine and of clinical care necessitates that we address issues of usability, workflow, transparency, safety, and formal clinical trials. These requirements contribute to an ongoing research agenda that means academic AIM research will continue to be vibrant while having new opportunities for more interactions with industry.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6697517
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66975172019-08-19 Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: Weighing the Accomplishments, Hype, and Promise Shortliffe, Edward H. Yearb Med Inform Introduction : Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (AIM) research is now 50 years old, having made great progress that has tracked the corresponding evolution of computer science, hardware technology, communications, and biomedicine. Characterized as being in its “adolescence” at an international meeting in 1991, and as “coming of age” at another meeting in 2007, the AIM field is now more visible and influential than ever before, paralleling the enthusiasm and accomplishments of artificial intelligence (AI) more generally. Objectives : This article summarizes some of that AIM history, providing an update on the status of the field as it enters its second half-century. It acknowledges the failure of AI, including AIM, to live up to early predictions of its likely capabilities and impact. Methods : The paper reviews and assesses the early history of the AIM field, referring to the conclusions of papers based on the meetings in 1991 and 2007, and analyzing the subsequent evolution of AIM. Conclusion : We must be cautious in assessing the speed at which further progress will be made, despite today’s wild predictions in the press and large investments by industry, including in health care. The inherent complexity of medicine and of clinical care necessitates that we address issues of usability, workflow, transparency, safety, and formal clinical trials. These requirements contribute to an ongoing research agenda that means academic AIM research will continue to be vibrant while having new opportunities for more interactions with industry. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2019-08 2019-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6697517/ /pubmed/31022745 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1677891 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Shortliffe, Edward H.
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: Weighing the Accomplishments, Hype, and Promise
title Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: Weighing the Accomplishments, Hype, and Promise
title_full Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: Weighing the Accomplishments, Hype, and Promise
title_fullStr Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: Weighing the Accomplishments, Hype, and Promise
title_full_unstemmed Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: Weighing the Accomplishments, Hype, and Promise
title_short Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: Weighing the Accomplishments, Hype, and Promise
title_sort artificial intelligence in medicine: weighing the accomplishments, hype, and promise
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6697517/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31022745
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1677891
work_keys_str_mv AT shortliffeedwardh artificialintelligenceinmedicineweighingtheaccomplishmentshypeandpromise