Cargando…

Accuracy and usability of single-lead ECG from smartphones - A clinical study

BACKGROUND: Several wireless ECG devices are commercially available for possible screening, monitoring and diagnosis of rhythms. The field is rapidly expanding, and some devices have demonstrated acceptable qualities. The objective was to evaluate the accuracy, usability and diagnostic capabilities...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haverkamp, Haakon Tillmann, Fosse, Stig Ove, Schuster, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6697525/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30794928
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ipej.2019.02.006
_version_ 1783444400459743232
author Haverkamp, Haakon Tillmann
Fosse, Stig Ove
Schuster, Peter
author_facet Haverkamp, Haakon Tillmann
Fosse, Stig Ove
Schuster, Peter
author_sort Haverkamp, Haakon Tillmann
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Several wireless ECG devices are commercially available for possible screening, monitoring and diagnosis of rhythms. The field is rapidly expanding, and some devices have demonstrated acceptable qualities. The objective was to evaluate the accuracy, usability and diagnostic capabilities of smartphone ECG in both patients and healthy controls. METHODS: We used a commercially available smartphone ECG device, connected wirelessly to a tablet, to record a 30-s lead I ECG in 144 subjects—20 of whom repeated the test after vigorous exercise. The subjects included 94 patients under standard calculated 12-lead ECG surveillance; transcripts were obtained shortly after the smartphone ECG was acquired. RESULTS: No significant differences were found in the QRS, frequency and QT intervals between the two modalities. Smartphone ECG recordings separated pathologic rhythms (atrial fibrillation (AF)/flutter, atrioventricular block, regular supraventricular rhythm, and pacing) from sinus rhythms with a sensitivity of 0.75 and a specificity of 0.97. The specific diagnosis of AF appeared in 11 patients and was detected with a sensitivity of 1 and a specificity of 0.94. There was a marginal decrease in the interpretability of the smartphone ECG after exercise. Inter- and intraobserver variability was low. CONCLUSIONS: Smartphone ECG accurately measures most baseline intervals and has acceptable sensitivity and specificity for pathological rhythms, especially for AF. Vigorous activity has a minor influence on the readability of the PR interval. Elderly patients may face challenges in recording a smartphone ECG correctly without assistance. According to our findings, the smartphone ECG would be applicable as a screening device for pathological rhythms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6697525
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66975252019-08-19 Accuracy and usability of single-lead ECG from smartphones - A clinical study Haverkamp, Haakon Tillmann Fosse, Stig Ove Schuster, Peter Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J Original Article BACKGROUND: Several wireless ECG devices are commercially available for possible screening, monitoring and diagnosis of rhythms. The field is rapidly expanding, and some devices have demonstrated acceptable qualities. The objective was to evaluate the accuracy, usability and diagnostic capabilities of smartphone ECG in both patients and healthy controls. METHODS: We used a commercially available smartphone ECG device, connected wirelessly to a tablet, to record a 30-s lead I ECG in 144 subjects—20 of whom repeated the test after vigorous exercise. The subjects included 94 patients under standard calculated 12-lead ECG surveillance; transcripts were obtained shortly after the smartphone ECG was acquired. RESULTS: No significant differences were found in the QRS, frequency and QT intervals between the two modalities. Smartphone ECG recordings separated pathologic rhythms (atrial fibrillation (AF)/flutter, atrioventricular block, regular supraventricular rhythm, and pacing) from sinus rhythms with a sensitivity of 0.75 and a specificity of 0.97. The specific diagnosis of AF appeared in 11 patients and was detected with a sensitivity of 1 and a specificity of 0.94. There was a marginal decrease in the interpretability of the smartphone ECG after exercise. Inter- and intraobserver variability was low. CONCLUSIONS: Smartphone ECG accurately measures most baseline intervals and has acceptable sensitivity and specificity for pathological rhythms, especially for AF. Vigorous activity has a minor influence on the readability of the PR interval. Elderly patients may face challenges in recording a smartphone ECG correctly without assistance. According to our findings, the smartphone ECG would be applicable as a screening device for pathological rhythms. Elsevier 2019-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6697525/ /pubmed/30794928 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ipej.2019.02.006 Text en © 2019 Indian Heart Rhythm Society. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Haverkamp, Haakon Tillmann
Fosse, Stig Ove
Schuster, Peter
Accuracy and usability of single-lead ECG from smartphones - A clinical study
title Accuracy and usability of single-lead ECG from smartphones - A clinical study
title_full Accuracy and usability of single-lead ECG from smartphones - A clinical study
title_fullStr Accuracy and usability of single-lead ECG from smartphones - A clinical study
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy and usability of single-lead ECG from smartphones - A clinical study
title_short Accuracy and usability of single-lead ECG from smartphones - A clinical study
title_sort accuracy and usability of single-lead ecg from smartphones - a clinical study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6697525/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30794928
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ipej.2019.02.006
work_keys_str_mv AT haverkamphaakontillmann accuracyandusabilityofsingleleadecgfromsmartphonesaclinicalstudy
AT fossestigove accuracyandusabilityofsingleleadecgfromsmartphonesaclinicalstudy
AT schusterpeter accuracyandusabilityofsingleleadecgfromsmartphonesaclinicalstudy