Cargando…

Minimally Invasive Pilonidal Sinus Treatment: A Narrative Review

The management of chronic pilonidal disease remains controversial, but recently, new minimal invasive approaches have been proposed. Whereas in the conventional surgical treatment an elliptical wedge of skin and subcutaneous tissue is created to remove the sinus and its lateral tracks, the basis for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Velotti, Nunzio, Manigrasso, Michele, Di Lauro, Katia, Araimo, Enrico, Calculli, Federica, Vertaldi, Sara, Anoldo, Pietro, Aprea, Giovanni, Simone, Giuseppe De, Vitiello, Antonio, Musella, Mario, Milone, Marco, De Palma, Giovanni Domenico, Milone, Francesco, Sosa Fernandez, Loredana Maria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: De Gruyter 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6698053/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31428682
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/med-2019-0059
_version_ 1783444484465360896
author Velotti, Nunzio
Manigrasso, Michele
Di Lauro, Katia
Araimo, Enrico
Calculli, Federica
Vertaldi, Sara
Anoldo, Pietro
Aprea, Giovanni
Simone, Giuseppe De
Vitiello, Antonio
Musella, Mario
Milone, Marco
De Palma, Giovanni Domenico
Milone, Francesco
Sosa Fernandez, Loredana Maria
author_facet Velotti, Nunzio
Manigrasso, Michele
Di Lauro, Katia
Araimo, Enrico
Calculli, Federica
Vertaldi, Sara
Anoldo, Pietro
Aprea, Giovanni
Simone, Giuseppe De
Vitiello, Antonio
Musella, Mario
Milone, Marco
De Palma, Giovanni Domenico
Milone, Francesco
Sosa Fernandez, Loredana Maria
author_sort Velotti, Nunzio
collection PubMed
description The management of chronic pilonidal disease remains controversial, but recently, new minimal invasive approaches have been proposed. Whereas in the conventional surgical treatment an elliptical wedge of skin and subcutaneous tissue is created to remove the sinus and its lateral tracks, the basis for our new treatment is to create a minimal elliptical wedge of the subcutaneous tissue, including all the inflamed tissue and debris while leaving the overlying skin intact. The mechanism of an endoscopic approach relies on use of the endoscope without cutaneous tissue damage. Advantages include shorter operative time and time to discharge, which impact resource management in both primary and secondary care: patients undergoing endoscopic technique have a high satisfaction rate, probably due to the low level of postoperative pain and early return to work and daily activities. However, it is mandatory that further studies would analyze surgical approaches to pilonidal sinus disease (PSD) with a consistent and adequate follow-up of at least 5 years. Both sinusectomy and endoscopic approach to PSD were found to be safe and effective compared with conventional techniques. Publishedresults of studies of newer approaches have demonstrated a low short-term complication rate, comparable to conventional surgery results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6698053
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher De Gruyter
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66980532019-08-19 Minimally Invasive Pilonidal Sinus Treatment: A Narrative Review Velotti, Nunzio Manigrasso, Michele Di Lauro, Katia Araimo, Enrico Calculli, Federica Vertaldi, Sara Anoldo, Pietro Aprea, Giovanni Simone, Giuseppe De Vitiello, Antonio Musella, Mario Milone, Marco De Palma, Giovanni Domenico Milone, Francesco Sosa Fernandez, Loredana Maria Open Med (Wars) Review Article The management of chronic pilonidal disease remains controversial, but recently, new minimal invasive approaches have been proposed. Whereas in the conventional surgical treatment an elliptical wedge of skin and subcutaneous tissue is created to remove the sinus and its lateral tracks, the basis for our new treatment is to create a minimal elliptical wedge of the subcutaneous tissue, including all the inflamed tissue and debris while leaving the overlying skin intact. The mechanism of an endoscopic approach relies on use of the endoscope without cutaneous tissue damage. Advantages include shorter operative time and time to discharge, which impact resource management in both primary and secondary care: patients undergoing endoscopic technique have a high satisfaction rate, probably due to the low level of postoperative pain and early return to work and daily activities. However, it is mandatory that further studies would analyze surgical approaches to pilonidal sinus disease (PSD) with a consistent and adequate follow-up of at least 5 years. Both sinusectomy and endoscopic approach to PSD were found to be safe and effective compared with conventional techniques. Publishedresults of studies of newer approaches have demonstrated a low short-term complication rate, comparable to conventional surgery results. De Gruyter 2019-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6698053/ /pubmed/31428682 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/med-2019-0059 Text en © 2019 Nunzio Velotti et al., published by De Gruyter http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Public License.
spellingShingle Review Article
Velotti, Nunzio
Manigrasso, Michele
Di Lauro, Katia
Araimo, Enrico
Calculli, Federica
Vertaldi, Sara
Anoldo, Pietro
Aprea, Giovanni
Simone, Giuseppe De
Vitiello, Antonio
Musella, Mario
Milone, Marco
De Palma, Giovanni Domenico
Milone, Francesco
Sosa Fernandez, Loredana Maria
Minimally Invasive Pilonidal Sinus Treatment: A Narrative Review
title Minimally Invasive Pilonidal Sinus Treatment: A Narrative Review
title_full Minimally Invasive Pilonidal Sinus Treatment: A Narrative Review
title_fullStr Minimally Invasive Pilonidal Sinus Treatment: A Narrative Review
title_full_unstemmed Minimally Invasive Pilonidal Sinus Treatment: A Narrative Review
title_short Minimally Invasive Pilonidal Sinus Treatment: A Narrative Review
title_sort minimally invasive pilonidal sinus treatment: a narrative review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6698053/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31428682
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/med-2019-0059
work_keys_str_mv AT velottinunzio minimallyinvasivepilonidalsinustreatmentanarrativereview
AT manigrassomichele minimallyinvasivepilonidalsinustreatmentanarrativereview
AT dilaurokatia minimallyinvasivepilonidalsinustreatmentanarrativereview
AT araimoenrico minimallyinvasivepilonidalsinustreatmentanarrativereview
AT calcullifederica minimallyinvasivepilonidalsinustreatmentanarrativereview
AT vertaldisara minimallyinvasivepilonidalsinustreatmentanarrativereview
AT anoldopietro minimallyinvasivepilonidalsinustreatmentanarrativereview
AT apreagiovanni minimallyinvasivepilonidalsinustreatmentanarrativereview
AT simonegiuseppede minimallyinvasivepilonidalsinustreatmentanarrativereview
AT vitielloantonio minimallyinvasivepilonidalsinustreatmentanarrativereview
AT musellamario minimallyinvasivepilonidalsinustreatmentanarrativereview
AT milonemarco minimallyinvasivepilonidalsinustreatmentanarrativereview
AT depalmagiovannidomenico minimallyinvasivepilonidalsinustreatmentanarrativereview
AT milonefrancesco minimallyinvasivepilonidalsinustreatmentanarrativereview
AT sosafernandezloredanamaria minimallyinvasivepilonidalsinustreatmentanarrativereview