Cargando…
Methods for questionnaire design: a taxonomy linking procedures to test goals
BACKGROUND: In the clinical field, the use of questionnaires is ubiquitous, and many different methods for constructing them are available. The reason for using a specific method is usually lacking, and a generally accepted classification of methods is not yet available. To guide test developers and...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6698299/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31104278 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02209-6 |
_version_ | 1783444525010649088 |
---|---|
author | Oosterveld, Paul Vorst, Harrie C. M. Smits, Niels |
author_facet | Oosterveld, Paul Vorst, Harrie C. M. Smits, Niels |
author_sort | Oosterveld, Paul |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In the clinical field, the use of questionnaires is ubiquitous, and many different methods for constructing them are available. The reason for using a specific method is usually lacking, and a generally accepted classification of methods is not yet available. To guide test developers and users, this article presents a taxonomy for methods of questionnaire design which links the methods to the goal of a test. METHODS: The taxonomy assumes that construction methods are directed towards psychometric aspects. Four stages of test construction are distinguished to describe methods: concept analysis, item production, scale construction, and evaluation; the scale construction stage is used for identifying methods. It distinguishes six different methods: the rational method utilizes expert judgments to ensure face validity. The prototypical method uses prototypicality judgments to ensure process validity. In the internal method, item sets are selected that optimize homogeneity. The external method optimizes criterion validity by selecting items that best predict an external criterion. Under the construct method theoretical considerations are used to optimize construct validity. The facet method is aimed at optimizing content validity through a complete representation of the concept domain. CONCLUSION: The taxonomy is comprehensive, constitutes a useful tool for describing procedures used in questionnaire design, and allows for setting up a test construction plan in which the priorities among psychometric aspects are made explicit. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6698299 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66982992019-08-29 Methods for questionnaire design: a taxonomy linking procedures to test goals Oosterveld, Paul Vorst, Harrie C. M. Smits, Niels Qual Life Res Commentary BACKGROUND: In the clinical field, the use of questionnaires is ubiquitous, and many different methods for constructing them are available. The reason for using a specific method is usually lacking, and a generally accepted classification of methods is not yet available. To guide test developers and users, this article presents a taxonomy for methods of questionnaire design which links the methods to the goal of a test. METHODS: The taxonomy assumes that construction methods are directed towards psychometric aspects. Four stages of test construction are distinguished to describe methods: concept analysis, item production, scale construction, and evaluation; the scale construction stage is used for identifying methods. It distinguishes six different methods: the rational method utilizes expert judgments to ensure face validity. The prototypical method uses prototypicality judgments to ensure process validity. In the internal method, item sets are selected that optimize homogeneity. The external method optimizes criterion validity by selecting items that best predict an external criterion. Under the construct method theoretical considerations are used to optimize construct validity. The facet method is aimed at optimizing content validity through a complete representation of the concept domain. CONCLUSION: The taxonomy is comprehensive, constitutes a useful tool for describing procedures used in questionnaire design, and allows for setting up a test construction plan in which the priorities among psychometric aspects are made explicit. Springer International Publishing 2019-05-18 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6698299/ /pubmed/31104278 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02209-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Oosterveld, Paul Vorst, Harrie C. M. Smits, Niels Methods for questionnaire design: a taxonomy linking procedures to test goals |
title | Methods for questionnaire design: a taxonomy linking procedures to test goals |
title_full | Methods for questionnaire design: a taxonomy linking procedures to test goals |
title_fullStr | Methods for questionnaire design: a taxonomy linking procedures to test goals |
title_full_unstemmed | Methods for questionnaire design: a taxonomy linking procedures to test goals |
title_short | Methods for questionnaire design: a taxonomy linking procedures to test goals |
title_sort | methods for questionnaire design: a taxonomy linking procedures to test goals |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6698299/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31104278 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02209-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oosterveldpaul methodsforquestionnairedesignataxonomylinkingprocedurestotestgoals AT vorstharriecm methodsforquestionnairedesignataxonomylinkingprocedurestotestgoals AT smitsniels methodsforquestionnairedesignataxonomylinkingprocedurestotestgoals |