Cargando…

Comparison of neutrophil and lymphocyte at 1 and 4 days postoperatively: reliable and early detection markers for surgical site infection following instrumented spinal fusion

INTRODUCTION: To identify the temporal comparison of biochemical markers for early detection of surgical site infection (SSI) following instrumented spinal fusion that are not affected by operative factors. METHODS: We reviewed data on C-reactive protein level and total white blood cell count and di...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yamamoto, Yusuke, Iwata, Eiichiro, Shigematsu, Hideki, Nakajima, Hiroshi, Tanaka, Masato, Okuda, Akinori, Morimoto, Yasuhiko, Masuda, Keisuke, Koizumi, Munehisa, Tanaka, Yasuhito
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6698500/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31440658
http://dx.doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2017-0052
_version_ 1783444552991899648
author Yamamoto, Yusuke
Iwata, Eiichiro
Shigematsu, Hideki
Nakajima, Hiroshi
Tanaka, Masato
Okuda, Akinori
Morimoto, Yasuhiko
Masuda, Keisuke
Koizumi, Munehisa
Tanaka, Yasuhito
author_facet Yamamoto, Yusuke
Iwata, Eiichiro
Shigematsu, Hideki
Nakajima, Hiroshi
Tanaka, Masato
Okuda, Akinori
Morimoto, Yasuhiko
Masuda, Keisuke
Koizumi, Munehisa
Tanaka, Yasuhito
author_sort Yamamoto, Yusuke
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: To identify the temporal comparison of biochemical markers for early detection of surgical site infection (SSI) following instrumented spinal fusion that are not affected by operative factors. METHODS: We reviewed data on C-reactive protein level and total white blood cell count and differential count before instrumented spinal fusion and at 1, 4, and 7 days postoperatively. The 141 patients in our sample were divided into an SSI group (patients who developed deep SSI) and a non-SSI group. We investigated the peak or nadir value day and identified those not affected by operative circumstances (operating time, intraoperative blood loss, and number of fusion segments) in the non-SSI group. If there was a significant difference between the peak or nadir value day and the next survey day, we considered the temporal comparison between these unaffected markers as an indicator of SSI and examined the usefulness of these indicators by calculating sensitivity and specificity. Furthermore, we investigated the usefulness of the combination of these markers (if even each one marker was recognized, we considered it positive). RESULTS: Four biochemical markers of SSI were selected: neutrophil percentage at postoperative day 4 more than day 1 (sensitivity 36%, specificity 95%), neutrophil count at postoperative day 4 more than day 1 (sensitivity 46%, specificity 93%), lymphocyte percentage at postoperative day 4 less than day 1 (sensitivity 36%, specificity 90%), and lymphocyte count at postoperative day 4 less than day 1 (sensitivity 36%, specificity 90%). The combination of these markers showed sensitivity 100%, specificity 80%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Four markers are reliable indicators for early detection of SSI following spinal instrumented fusion because they are not affected by operative factor. The combination of each indicator had both high sensitivity and specificity. Therefore, it is reliable and much useful for early detection of SSI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6698500
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66985002019-08-22 Comparison of neutrophil and lymphocyte at 1 and 4 days postoperatively: reliable and early detection markers for surgical site infection following instrumented spinal fusion Yamamoto, Yusuke Iwata, Eiichiro Shigematsu, Hideki Nakajima, Hiroshi Tanaka, Masato Okuda, Akinori Morimoto, Yasuhiko Masuda, Keisuke Koizumi, Munehisa Tanaka, Yasuhito Spine Surg Relat Res Original Article INTRODUCTION: To identify the temporal comparison of biochemical markers for early detection of surgical site infection (SSI) following instrumented spinal fusion that are not affected by operative factors. METHODS: We reviewed data on C-reactive protein level and total white blood cell count and differential count before instrumented spinal fusion and at 1, 4, and 7 days postoperatively. The 141 patients in our sample were divided into an SSI group (patients who developed deep SSI) and a non-SSI group. We investigated the peak or nadir value day and identified those not affected by operative circumstances (operating time, intraoperative blood loss, and number of fusion segments) in the non-SSI group. If there was a significant difference between the peak or nadir value day and the next survey day, we considered the temporal comparison between these unaffected markers as an indicator of SSI and examined the usefulness of these indicators by calculating sensitivity and specificity. Furthermore, we investigated the usefulness of the combination of these markers (if even each one marker was recognized, we considered it positive). RESULTS: Four biochemical markers of SSI were selected: neutrophil percentage at postoperative day 4 more than day 1 (sensitivity 36%, specificity 95%), neutrophil count at postoperative day 4 more than day 1 (sensitivity 46%, specificity 93%), lymphocyte percentage at postoperative day 4 less than day 1 (sensitivity 36%, specificity 90%), and lymphocyte count at postoperative day 4 less than day 1 (sensitivity 36%, specificity 90%). The combination of these markers showed sensitivity 100%, specificity 80%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Four markers are reliable indicators for early detection of SSI following spinal instrumented fusion because they are not affected by operative factor. The combination of each indicator had both high sensitivity and specificity. Therefore, it is reliable and much useful for early detection of SSI. The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research 2018-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6698500/ /pubmed/31440658 http://dx.doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2017-0052 Text en Copyright © 2018 by The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Spine Surgery and Related Research is an Open Access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view the details of this license, please visit (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Yamamoto, Yusuke
Iwata, Eiichiro
Shigematsu, Hideki
Nakajima, Hiroshi
Tanaka, Masato
Okuda, Akinori
Morimoto, Yasuhiko
Masuda, Keisuke
Koizumi, Munehisa
Tanaka, Yasuhito
Comparison of neutrophil and lymphocyte at 1 and 4 days postoperatively: reliable and early detection markers for surgical site infection following instrumented spinal fusion
title Comparison of neutrophil and lymphocyte at 1 and 4 days postoperatively: reliable and early detection markers for surgical site infection following instrumented spinal fusion
title_full Comparison of neutrophil and lymphocyte at 1 and 4 days postoperatively: reliable and early detection markers for surgical site infection following instrumented spinal fusion
title_fullStr Comparison of neutrophil and lymphocyte at 1 and 4 days postoperatively: reliable and early detection markers for surgical site infection following instrumented spinal fusion
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of neutrophil and lymphocyte at 1 and 4 days postoperatively: reliable and early detection markers for surgical site infection following instrumented spinal fusion
title_short Comparison of neutrophil and lymphocyte at 1 and 4 days postoperatively: reliable and early detection markers for surgical site infection following instrumented spinal fusion
title_sort comparison of neutrophil and lymphocyte at 1 and 4 days postoperatively: reliable and early detection markers for surgical site infection following instrumented spinal fusion
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6698500/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31440658
http://dx.doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2017-0052
work_keys_str_mv AT yamamotoyusuke comparisonofneutrophilandlymphocyteat1and4dayspostoperativelyreliableandearlydetectionmarkersforsurgicalsiteinfectionfollowinginstrumentedspinalfusion
AT iwataeiichiro comparisonofneutrophilandlymphocyteat1and4dayspostoperativelyreliableandearlydetectionmarkersforsurgicalsiteinfectionfollowinginstrumentedspinalfusion
AT shigematsuhideki comparisonofneutrophilandlymphocyteat1and4dayspostoperativelyreliableandearlydetectionmarkersforsurgicalsiteinfectionfollowinginstrumentedspinalfusion
AT nakajimahiroshi comparisonofneutrophilandlymphocyteat1and4dayspostoperativelyreliableandearlydetectionmarkersforsurgicalsiteinfectionfollowinginstrumentedspinalfusion
AT tanakamasato comparisonofneutrophilandlymphocyteat1and4dayspostoperativelyreliableandearlydetectionmarkersforsurgicalsiteinfectionfollowinginstrumentedspinalfusion
AT okudaakinori comparisonofneutrophilandlymphocyteat1and4dayspostoperativelyreliableandearlydetectionmarkersforsurgicalsiteinfectionfollowinginstrumentedspinalfusion
AT morimotoyasuhiko comparisonofneutrophilandlymphocyteat1and4dayspostoperativelyreliableandearlydetectionmarkersforsurgicalsiteinfectionfollowinginstrumentedspinalfusion
AT masudakeisuke comparisonofneutrophilandlymphocyteat1and4dayspostoperativelyreliableandearlydetectionmarkersforsurgicalsiteinfectionfollowinginstrumentedspinalfusion
AT koizumimunehisa comparisonofneutrophilandlymphocyteat1and4dayspostoperativelyreliableandearlydetectionmarkersforsurgicalsiteinfectionfollowinginstrumentedspinalfusion
AT tanakayasuhito comparisonofneutrophilandlymphocyteat1and4dayspostoperativelyreliableandearlydetectionmarkersforsurgicalsiteinfectionfollowinginstrumentedspinalfusion