Cargando…
Comparison of neutrophil and lymphocyte at 1 and 4 days postoperatively: reliable and early detection markers for surgical site infection following instrumented spinal fusion
INTRODUCTION: To identify the temporal comparison of biochemical markers for early detection of surgical site infection (SSI) following instrumented spinal fusion that are not affected by operative factors. METHODS: We reviewed data on C-reactive protein level and total white blood cell count and di...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6698500/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31440658 http://dx.doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2017-0052 |
_version_ | 1783444552991899648 |
---|---|
author | Yamamoto, Yusuke Iwata, Eiichiro Shigematsu, Hideki Nakajima, Hiroshi Tanaka, Masato Okuda, Akinori Morimoto, Yasuhiko Masuda, Keisuke Koizumi, Munehisa Tanaka, Yasuhito |
author_facet | Yamamoto, Yusuke Iwata, Eiichiro Shigematsu, Hideki Nakajima, Hiroshi Tanaka, Masato Okuda, Akinori Morimoto, Yasuhiko Masuda, Keisuke Koizumi, Munehisa Tanaka, Yasuhito |
author_sort | Yamamoto, Yusuke |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: To identify the temporal comparison of biochemical markers for early detection of surgical site infection (SSI) following instrumented spinal fusion that are not affected by operative factors. METHODS: We reviewed data on C-reactive protein level and total white blood cell count and differential count before instrumented spinal fusion and at 1, 4, and 7 days postoperatively. The 141 patients in our sample were divided into an SSI group (patients who developed deep SSI) and a non-SSI group. We investigated the peak or nadir value day and identified those not affected by operative circumstances (operating time, intraoperative blood loss, and number of fusion segments) in the non-SSI group. If there was a significant difference between the peak or nadir value day and the next survey day, we considered the temporal comparison between these unaffected markers as an indicator of SSI and examined the usefulness of these indicators by calculating sensitivity and specificity. Furthermore, we investigated the usefulness of the combination of these markers (if even each one marker was recognized, we considered it positive). RESULTS: Four biochemical markers of SSI were selected: neutrophil percentage at postoperative day 4 more than day 1 (sensitivity 36%, specificity 95%), neutrophil count at postoperative day 4 more than day 1 (sensitivity 46%, specificity 93%), lymphocyte percentage at postoperative day 4 less than day 1 (sensitivity 36%, specificity 90%), and lymphocyte count at postoperative day 4 less than day 1 (sensitivity 36%, specificity 90%). The combination of these markers showed sensitivity 100%, specificity 80%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Four markers are reliable indicators for early detection of SSI following spinal instrumented fusion because they are not affected by operative factor. The combination of each indicator had both high sensitivity and specificity. Therefore, it is reliable and much useful for early detection of SSI. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6698500 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66985002019-08-22 Comparison of neutrophil and lymphocyte at 1 and 4 days postoperatively: reliable and early detection markers for surgical site infection following instrumented spinal fusion Yamamoto, Yusuke Iwata, Eiichiro Shigematsu, Hideki Nakajima, Hiroshi Tanaka, Masato Okuda, Akinori Morimoto, Yasuhiko Masuda, Keisuke Koizumi, Munehisa Tanaka, Yasuhito Spine Surg Relat Res Original Article INTRODUCTION: To identify the temporal comparison of biochemical markers for early detection of surgical site infection (SSI) following instrumented spinal fusion that are not affected by operative factors. METHODS: We reviewed data on C-reactive protein level and total white blood cell count and differential count before instrumented spinal fusion and at 1, 4, and 7 days postoperatively. The 141 patients in our sample were divided into an SSI group (patients who developed deep SSI) and a non-SSI group. We investigated the peak or nadir value day and identified those not affected by operative circumstances (operating time, intraoperative blood loss, and number of fusion segments) in the non-SSI group. If there was a significant difference between the peak or nadir value day and the next survey day, we considered the temporal comparison between these unaffected markers as an indicator of SSI and examined the usefulness of these indicators by calculating sensitivity and specificity. Furthermore, we investigated the usefulness of the combination of these markers (if even each one marker was recognized, we considered it positive). RESULTS: Four biochemical markers of SSI were selected: neutrophil percentage at postoperative day 4 more than day 1 (sensitivity 36%, specificity 95%), neutrophil count at postoperative day 4 more than day 1 (sensitivity 46%, specificity 93%), lymphocyte percentage at postoperative day 4 less than day 1 (sensitivity 36%, specificity 90%), and lymphocyte count at postoperative day 4 less than day 1 (sensitivity 36%, specificity 90%). The combination of these markers showed sensitivity 100%, specificity 80%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Four markers are reliable indicators for early detection of SSI following spinal instrumented fusion because they are not affected by operative factor. The combination of each indicator had both high sensitivity and specificity. Therefore, it is reliable and much useful for early detection of SSI. The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research 2018-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6698500/ /pubmed/31440658 http://dx.doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2017-0052 Text en Copyright © 2018 by The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Spine Surgery and Related Research is an Open Access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view the details of this license, please visit (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Yamamoto, Yusuke Iwata, Eiichiro Shigematsu, Hideki Nakajima, Hiroshi Tanaka, Masato Okuda, Akinori Morimoto, Yasuhiko Masuda, Keisuke Koizumi, Munehisa Tanaka, Yasuhito Comparison of neutrophil and lymphocyte at 1 and 4 days postoperatively: reliable and early detection markers for surgical site infection following instrumented spinal fusion |
title | Comparison of neutrophil and lymphocyte at 1 and 4 days postoperatively: reliable and early detection markers for surgical site infection following instrumented spinal fusion |
title_full | Comparison of neutrophil and lymphocyte at 1 and 4 days postoperatively: reliable and early detection markers for surgical site infection following instrumented spinal fusion |
title_fullStr | Comparison of neutrophil and lymphocyte at 1 and 4 days postoperatively: reliable and early detection markers for surgical site infection following instrumented spinal fusion |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of neutrophil and lymphocyte at 1 and 4 days postoperatively: reliable and early detection markers for surgical site infection following instrumented spinal fusion |
title_short | Comparison of neutrophil and lymphocyte at 1 and 4 days postoperatively: reliable and early detection markers for surgical site infection following instrumented spinal fusion |
title_sort | comparison of neutrophil and lymphocyte at 1 and 4 days postoperatively: reliable and early detection markers for surgical site infection following instrumented spinal fusion |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6698500/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31440658 http://dx.doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2017-0052 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yamamotoyusuke comparisonofneutrophilandlymphocyteat1and4dayspostoperativelyreliableandearlydetectionmarkersforsurgicalsiteinfectionfollowinginstrumentedspinalfusion AT iwataeiichiro comparisonofneutrophilandlymphocyteat1and4dayspostoperativelyreliableandearlydetectionmarkersforsurgicalsiteinfectionfollowinginstrumentedspinalfusion AT shigematsuhideki comparisonofneutrophilandlymphocyteat1and4dayspostoperativelyreliableandearlydetectionmarkersforsurgicalsiteinfectionfollowinginstrumentedspinalfusion AT nakajimahiroshi comparisonofneutrophilandlymphocyteat1and4dayspostoperativelyreliableandearlydetectionmarkersforsurgicalsiteinfectionfollowinginstrumentedspinalfusion AT tanakamasato comparisonofneutrophilandlymphocyteat1and4dayspostoperativelyreliableandearlydetectionmarkersforsurgicalsiteinfectionfollowinginstrumentedspinalfusion AT okudaakinori comparisonofneutrophilandlymphocyteat1and4dayspostoperativelyreliableandearlydetectionmarkersforsurgicalsiteinfectionfollowinginstrumentedspinalfusion AT morimotoyasuhiko comparisonofneutrophilandlymphocyteat1and4dayspostoperativelyreliableandearlydetectionmarkersforsurgicalsiteinfectionfollowinginstrumentedspinalfusion AT masudakeisuke comparisonofneutrophilandlymphocyteat1and4dayspostoperativelyreliableandearlydetectionmarkersforsurgicalsiteinfectionfollowinginstrumentedspinalfusion AT koizumimunehisa comparisonofneutrophilandlymphocyteat1and4dayspostoperativelyreliableandearlydetectionmarkersforsurgicalsiteinfectionfollowinginstrumentedspinalfusion AT tanakayasuhito comparisonofneutrophilandlymphocyteat1and4dayspostoperativelyreliableandearlydetectionmarkersforsurgicalsiteinfectionfollowinginstrumentedspinalfusion |