Cargando…
Risk factors of instrumentation failure after multilevel total en bloc spondylectomy
Introduction: Multilevel total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) is required to secure oncologically adequate resection margins. However, no useful information has been reported for spinal reconstruction after multilevel TES. Therefore, this study set out to assess the clinical and radiological outcomes o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6698537/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31440610 http://dx.doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.1.2016-0005 |
_version_ | 1783444562142822400 |
---|---|
author | Yoshioka, Katsuhito Murakami, Hideki Demura, Satoru Kato, Satoshi Yokogawa, Noriaki Kawahara, Norio Tomita, Katsuro Tsuchiya, Hiroyuki |
author_facet | Yoshioka, Katsuhito Murakami, Hideki Demura, Satoru Kato, Satoshi Yokogawa, Noriaki Kawahara, Norio Tomita, Katsuro Tsuchiya, Hiroyuki |
author_sort | Yoshioka, Katsuhito |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction: Multilevel total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) is required to secure oncologically adequate resection margins. However, no useful information has been reported for spinal reconstruction after multilevel TES. Therefore, this study set out to assess the clinical and radiological outcomes of spinal reconstruction after multilevel TES. Methods: Forty-eight patients treated with multilevel TES at our institute were included in the analysis. Reconstruction was achieved with posterior pedicle screw fixation and an anterior titanium mesh cage filled with iliac autograft in all cases. Spinal shortening was performed to increase spinal stability from the reconstruction. Instrumentation failure and radiological findings were evaluated with radiography and computerized tomography (CT). Results: After excluding one patient whose general condition was deteriorating, radiological evaluations of 47 patients were performed over a period of more than a year. The follow-up time was 17 to 120 months (mean: 70.2 months). Instrumentation failure occurred in one patient (5.9%) after thoracic multilevel TES, in 4 patients (25.0%) after thoracolumbar multilevel TES, and in 3 patients (42.9%) after lumbar multilevel TES. No instrumentation failure was observed in cervicothoracic cases. Cage subsidence (>2 mm) occurred in 30 patients (63.8%). In 22 of them, subsidence appeared on the CT one month after surgery. The risk factors of instrumentation failure included a multilevel TES below the thoracolumbar level and a long span of vertebral resection. There was no instrumentation failure in any of the 11 “disc-to-disc cutting” cases. Conclusions: This study identified the risk factors of instrumentation failure after multilevel TES. There is a high risk of instrumentation failure in cases of long vertebral resection below the thoracolumbar level. On the other hand, our reconstruction method can be successful for multilevel TES above the thoracic level. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6698537 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66985372019-08-22 Risk factors of instrumentation failure after multilevel total en bloc spondylectomy Yoshioka, Katsuhito Murakami, Hideki Demura, Satoru Kato, Satoshi Yokogawa, Noriaki Kawahara, Norio Tomita, Katsuro Tsuchiya, Hiroyuki Spine Surg Relat Res Original Article Introduction: Multilevel total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) is required to secure oncologically adequate resection margins. However, no useful information has been reported for spinal reconstruction after multilevel TES. Therefore, this study set out to assess the clinical and radiological outcomes of spinal reconstruction after multilevel TES. Methods: Forty-eight patients treated with multilevel TES at our institute were included in the analysis. Reconstruction was achieved with posterior pedicle screw fixation and an anterior titanium mesh cage filled with iliac autograft in all cases. Spinal shortening was performed to increase spinal stability from the reconstruction. Instrumentation failure and radiological findings were evaluated with radiography and computerized tomography (CT). Results: After excluding one patient whose general condition was deteriorating, radiological evaluations of 47 patients were performed over a period of more than a year. The follow-up time was 17 to 120 months (mean: 70.2 months). Instrumentation failure occurred in one patient (5.9%) after thoracic multilevel TES, in 4 patients (25.0%) after thoracolumbar multilevel TES, and in 3 patients (42.9%) after lumbar multilevel TES. No instrumentation failure was observed in cervicothoracic cases. Cage subsidence (>2 mm) occurred in 30 patients (63.8%). In 22 of them, subsidence appeared on the CT one month after surgery. The risk factors of instrumentation failure included a multilevel TES below the thoracolumbar level and a long span of vertebral resection. There was no instrumentation failure in any of the 11 “disc-to-disc cutting” cases. Conclusions: This study identified the risk factors of instrumentation failure after multilevel TES. There is a high risk of instrumentation failure in cases of long vertebral resection below the thoracolumbar level. On the other hand, our reconstruction method can be successful for multilevel TES above the thoracic level. The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research 2017-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6698537/ /pubmed/31440610 http://dx.doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.1.2016-0005 Text en Copyright © 2017 by The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Spine Surgery and Related Research is an Open Access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view the details of this license, please visit (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Yoshioka, Katsuhito Murakami, Hideki Demura, Satoru Kato, Satoshi Yokogawa, Noriaki Kawahara, Norio Tomita, Katsuro Tsuchiya, Hiroyuki Risk factors of instrumentation failure after multilevel total en bloc spondylectomy |
title | Risk factors of instrumentation failure after multilevel total en bloc spondylectomy |
title_full | Risk factors of instrumentation failure after multilevel total en bloc spondylectomy |
title_fullStr | Risk factors of instrumentation failure after multilevel total en bloc spondylectomy |
title_full_unstemmed | Risk factors of instrumentation failure after multilevel total en bloc spondylectomy |
title_short | Risk factors of instrumentation failure after multilevel total en bloc spondylectomy |
title_sort | risk factors of instrumentation failure after multilevel total en bloc spondylectomy |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6698537/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31440610 http://dx.doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.1.2016-0005 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yoshiokakatsuhito riskfactorsofinstrumentationfailureaftermultileveltotalenblocspondylectomy AT murakamihideki riskfactorsofinstrumentationfailureaftermultileveltotalenblocspondylectomy AT demurasatoru riskfactorsofinstrumentationfailureaftermultileveltotalenblocspondylectomy AT katosatoshi riskfactorsofinstrumentationfailureaftermultileveltotalenblocspondylectomy AT yokogawanoriaki riskfactorsofinstrumentationfailureaftermultileveltotalenblocspondylectomy AT kawaharanorio riskfactorsofinstrumentationfailureaftermultileveltotalenblocspondylectomy AT tomitakatsuro riskfactorsofinstrumentationfailureaftermultileveltotalenblocspondylectomy AT tsuchiyahiroyuki riskfactorsofinstrumentationfailureaftermultileveltotalenblocspondylectomy |