Cargando…

Risk factors of instrumentation failure after multilevel total en bloc spondylectomy

Introduction: Multilevel total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) is required to secure oncologically adequate resection margins. However, no useful information has been reported for spinal reconstruction after multilevel TES. Therefore, this study set out to assess the clinical and radiological outcomes o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yoshioka, Katsuhito, Murakami, Hideki, Demura, Satoru, Kato, Satoshi, Yokogawa, Noriaki, Kawahara, Norio, Tomita, Katsuro, Tsuchiya, Hiroyuki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6698537/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31440610
http://dx.doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.1.2016-0005
_version_ 1783444562142822400
author Yoshioka, Katsuhito
Murakami, Hideki
Demura, Satoru
Kato, Satoshi
Yokogawa, Noriaki
Kawahara, Norio
Tomita, Katsuro
Tsuchiya, Hiroyuki
author_facet Yoshioka, Katsuhito
Murakami, Hideki
Demura, Satoru
Kato, Satoshi
Yokogawa, Noriaki
Kawahara, Norio
Tomita, Katsuro
Tsuchiya, Hiroyuki
author_sort Yoshioka, Katsuhito
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Multilevel total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) is required to secure oncologically adequate resection margins. However, no useful information has been reported for spinal reconstruction after multilevel TES. Therefore, this study set out to assess the clinical and radiological outcomes of spinal reconstruction after multilevel TES. Methods: Forty-eight patients treated with multilevel TES at our institute were included in the analysis. Reconstruction was achieved with posterior pedicle screw fixation and an anterior titanium mesh cage filled with iliac autograft in all cases. Spinal shortening was performed to increase spinal stability from the reconstruction. Instrumentation failure and radiological findings were evaluated with radiography and computerized tomography (CT). Results: After excluding one patient whose general condition was deteriorating, radiological evaluations of 47 patients were performed over a period of more than a year. The follow-up time was 17 to 120 months (mean: 70.2 months). Instrumentation failure occurred in one patient (5.9%) after thoracic multilevel TES, in 4 patients (25.0%) after thoracolumbar multilevel TES, and in 3 patients (42.9%) after lumbar multilevel TES. No instrumentation failure was observed in cervicothoracic cases. Cage subsidence (>2 mm) occurred in 30 patients (63.8%). In 22 of them, subsidence appeared on the CT one month after surgery. The risk factors of instrumentation failure included a multilevel TES below the thoracolumbar level and a long span of vertebral resection. There was no instrumentation failure in any of the 11 “disc-to-disc cutting” cases. Conclusions: This study identified the risk factors of instrumentation failure after multilevel TES. There is a high risk of instrumentation failure in cases of long vertebral resection below the thoracolumbar level. On the other hand, our reconstruction method can be successful for multilevel TES above the thoracic level.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6698537
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66985372019-08-22 Risk factors of instrumentation failure after multilevel total en bloc spondylectomy Yoshioka, Katsuhito Murakami, Hideki Demura, Satoru Kato, Satoshi Yokogawa, Noriaki Kawahara, Norio Tomita, Katsuro Tsuchiya, Hiroyuki Spine Surg Relat Res Original Article Introduction: Multilevel total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) is required to secure oncologically adequate resection margins. However, no useful information has been reported for spinal reconstruction after multilevel TES. Therefore, this study set out to assess the clinical and radiological outcomes of spinal reconstruction after multilevel TES. Methods: Forty-eight patients treated with multilevel TES at our institute were included in the analysis. Reconstruction was achieved with posterior pedicle screw fixation and an anterior titanium mesh cage filled with iliac autograft in all cases. Spinal shortening was performed to increase spinal stability from the reconstruction. Instrumentation failure and radiological findings were evaluated with radiography and computerized tomography (CT). Results: After excluding one patient whose general condition was deteriorating, radiological evaluations of 47 patients were performed over a period of more than a year. The follow-up time was 17 to 120 months (mean: 70.2 months). Instrumentation failure occurred in one patient (5.9%) after thoracic multilevel TES, in 4 patients (25.0%) after thoracolumbar multilevel TES, and in 3 patients (42.9%) after lumbar multilevel TES. No instrumentation failure was observed in cervicothoracic cases. Cage subsidence (>2 mm) occurred in 30 patients (63.8%). In 22 of them, subsidence appeared on the CT one month after surgery. The risk factors of instrumentation failure included a multilevel TES below the thoracolumbar level and a long span of vertebral resection. There was no instrumentation failure in any of the 11 “disc-to-disc cutting” cases. Conclusions: This study identified the risk factors of instrumentation failure after multilevel TES. There is a high risk of instrumentation failure in cases of long vertebral resection below the thoracolumbar level. On the other hand, our reconstruction method can be successful for multilevel TES above the thoracic level. The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research 2017-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6698537/ /pubmed/31440610 http://dx.doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.1.2016-0005 Text en Copyright © 2017 by The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Spine Surgery and Related Research is an Open Access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view the details of this license, please visit (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Yoshioka, Katsuhito
Murakami, Hideki
Demura, Satoru
Kato, Satoshi
Yokogawa, Noriaki
Kawahara, Norio
Tomita, Katsuro
Tsuchiya, Hiroyuki
Risk factors of instrumentation failure after multilevel total en bloc spondylectomy
title Risk factors of instrumentation failure after multilevel total en bloc spondylectomy
title_full Risk factors of instrumentation failure after multilevel total en bloc spondylectomy
title_fullStr Risk factors of instrumentation failure after multilevel total en bloc spondylectomy
title_full_unstemmed Risk factors of instrumentation failure after multilevel total en bloc spondylectomy
title_short Risk factors of instrumentation failure after multilevel total en bloc spondylectomy
title_sort risk factors of instrumentation failure after multilevel total en bloc spondylectomy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6698537/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31440610
http://dx.doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.1.2016-0005
work_keys_str_mv AT yoshiokakatsuhito riskfactorsofinstrumentationfailureaftermultileveltotalenblocspondylectomy
AT murakamihideki riskfactorsofinstrumentationfailureaftermultileveltotalenblocspondylectomy
AT demurasatoru riskfactorsofinstrumentationfailureaftermultileveltotalenblocspondylectomy
AT katosatoshi riskfactorsofinstrumentationfailureaftermultileveltotalenblocspondylectomy
AT yokogawanoriaki riskfactorsofinstrumentationfailureaftermultileveltotalenblocspondylectomy
AT kawaharanorio riskfactorsofinstrumentationfailureaftermultileveltotalenblocspondylectomy
AT tomitakatsuro riskfactorsofinstrumentationfailureaftermultileveltotalenblocspondylectomy
AT tsuchiyahiroyuki riskfactorsofinstrumentationfailureaftermultileveltotalenblocspondylectomy