Cargando…
Indications for prophylactic lumbar decompression at the L3/4 level in patients with L4/5 responsible lumbar spinal canal stenosis
INTRODUCTION: Lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSS) is a very common disease. When the responsible level is considered to be L4/5 despite the appearance of double-level (L3/4 and L4/5) stenosis on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), it is difficult for spinal surgeons to decide whether prophylactic decom...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6698573/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31440633 http://dx.doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.1.2016-0032 |
_version_ | 1783444570881654784 |
---|---|
author | Asari, Toru Aburakawa, Shuichi Kumagai, Gentaro Tanaka, Sunao Ishibashi, Yasuyuki |
author_facet | Asari, Toru Aburakawa, Shuichi Kumagai, Gentaro Tanaka, Sunao Ishibashi, Yasuyuki |
author_sort | Asari, Toru |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSS) is a very common disease. When the responsible level is considered to be L4/5 despite the appearance of double-level (L3/4 and L4/5) stenosis on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), it is difficult for spinal surgeons to decide whether prophylactic decompression should be performed at the L3/4 level. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the dural sac cross-sectional area (DCSA) at the L3/4 level and clinical symptoms in patients with double-level stenosis. METHODS: Thirty-five patients with double-level stenosis were registered in this study. All patients underwent decompression surgery at the L4/5 responsible level. The severity of patients' symptoms was evaluated by the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score and its rate of recovery. A measurement program on MRI was used to determine the DCSA. RESULTS: The clinical course of LSS according to the JOA score recovery rate at the final follow-up revealed that the good group (≥50%) included 27 patients, and the poor group (<50%) included 8 patients. In the good group, the mean DCSA at the L3/4 level was 72.3 ± 32.1 mm(2) preoperatively and 71.3 ± 29.0 mm(2) at the final follow-up. In contrast, in the poor group, the mean DCSA at the L3/4 level was 49.1 ± 23.8 mm(2) preoperatively and 40.6 ± 14.1 mm(2) at the final follow-up. Significant differences were observed in the preoperative and final follow-up DCSAs at the L3/4 level between two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Considering the present results, prophylactic decompression surgery at the L3/4 level should be performed for patients with double-level stenosis and DCSA <50 mm(2) at the L3/4 level. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6698573 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66985732019-08-22 Indications for prophylactic lumbar decompression at the L3/4 level in patients with L4/5 responsible lumbar spinal canal stenosis Asari, Toru Aburakawa, Shuichi Kumagai, Gentaro Tanaka, Sunao Ishibashi, Yasuyuki Spine Surg Relat Res Original Article INTRODUCTION: Lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSS) is a very common disease. When the responsible level is considered to be L4/5 despite the appearance of double-level (L3/4 and L4/5) stenosis on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), it is difficult for spinal surgeons to decide whether prophylactic decompression should be performed at the L3/4 level. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the dural sac cross-sectional area (DCSA) at the L3/4 level and clinical symptoms in patients with double-level stenosis. METHODS: Thirty-five patients with double-level stenosis were registered in this study. All patients underwent decompression surgery at the L4/5 responsible level. The severity of patients' symptoms was evaluated by the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score and its rate of recovery. A measurement program on MRI was used to determine the DCSA. RESULTS: The clinical course of LSS according to the JOA score recovery rate at the final follow-up revealed that the good group (≥50%) included 27 patients, and the poor group (<50%) included 8 patients. In the good group, the mean DCSA at the L3/4 level was 72.3 ± 32.1 mm(2) preoperatively and 71.3 ± 29.0 mm(2) at the final follow-up. In contrast, in the poor group, the mean DCSA at the L3/4 level was 49.1 ± 23.8 mm(2) preoperatively and 40.6 ± 14.1 mm(2) at the final follow-up. Significant differences were observed in the preoperative and final follow-up DCSAs at the L3/4 level between two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Considering the present results, prophylactic decompression surgery at the L3/4 level should be performed for patients with double-level stenosis and DCSA <50 mm(2) at the L3/4 level. The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research 2017-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6698573/ /pubmed/31440633 http://dx.doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.1.2016-0032 Text en Copyright © 2017 by The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Spine Surgery and Related Research is an Open Access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view the details of this license, please visit (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Asari, Toru Aburakawa, Shuichi Kumagai, Gentaro Tanaka, Sunao Ishibashi, Yasuyuki Indications for prophylactic lumbar decompression at the L3/4 level in patients with L4/5 responsible lumbar spinal canal stenosis |
title | Indications for prophylactic lumbar decompression at the L3/4 level in patients with L4/5 responsible lumbar spinal canal stenosis |
title_full | Indications for prophylactic lumbar decompression at the L3/4 level in patients with L4/5 responsible lumbar spinal canal stenosis |
title_fullStr | Indications for prophylactic lumbar decompression at the L3/4 level in patients with L4/5 responsible lumbar spinal canal stenosis |
title_full_unstemmed | Indications for prophylactic lumbar decompression at the L3/4 level in patients with L4/5 responsible lumbar spinal canal stenosis |
title_short | Indications for prophylactic lumbar decompression at the L3/4 level in patients with L4/5 responsible lumbar spinal canal stenosis |
title_sort | indications for prophylactic lumbar decompression at the l3/4 level in patients with l4/5 responsible lumbar spinal canal stenosis |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6698573/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31440633 http://dx.doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.1.2016-0032 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT asaritoru indicationsforprophylacticlumbardecompressionatthel34levelinpatientswithl45responsiblelumbarspinalcanalstenosis AT aburakawashuichi indicationsforprophylacticlumbardecompressionatthel34levelinpatientswithl45responsiblelumbarspinalcanalstenosis AT kumagaigentaro indicationsforprophylacticlumbardecompressionatthel34levelinpatientswithl45responsiblelumbarspinalcanalstenosis AT tanakasunao indicationsforprophylacticlumbardecompressionatthel34levelinpatientswithl45responsiblelumbarspinalcanalstenosis AT ishibashiyasuyuki indicationsforprophylacticlumbardecompressionatthel34levelinpatientswithl45responsiblelumbarspinalcanalstenosis |