Cargando…
Comparative effectiveness of antiepileptic drugs in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy
OBJECTIVE: To study the effectiveness and tolerability of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) commonly used in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME). METHODS: People with JME were identified from a large database of individuals with epilepsy, which includes detailed retrospective information on AED use. We asses...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6698679/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31440723 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/epi4.12349 |
_version_ | 1783444593091543040 |
---|---|
author | Silvennoinen, Katri de Lange, Nikola Zagaglia, Sara Balestrini, Simona Androsova, Ganna Wassenaar, Merel Auce, Pauls Avbersek, Andreja Becker, Felicitas Berghuis, Bianca Campbell, Ellen Coppola, Antonietta Francis, Ben Wolking, Stefan Cavalleri, Gianpiero L. Craig, John Delanty, Norman Johnson, Michael R. Koeleman, Bobby P. C. Kunz, Wolfram S. Lerche, Holger Marson, Anthony G. O’Brien, Terence J. Sander, Josemir W. Sills, Graeme J. Striano, Pasquale Zara, Federico van der Palen, Job Krause, Roland Depondt, Chantal Sisodiya, Sanjay M. |
author_facet | Silvennoinen, Katri de Lange, Nikola Zagaglia, Sara Balestrini, Simona Androsova, Ganna Wassenaar, Merel Auce, Pauls Avbersek, Andreja Becker, Felicitas Berghuis, Bianca Campbell, Ellen Coppola, Antonietta Francis, Ben Wolking, Stefan Cavalleri, Gianpiero L. Craig, John Delanty, Norman Johnson, Michael R. Koeleman, Bobby P. C. Kunz, Wolfram S. Lerche, Holger Marson, Anthony G. O’Brien, Terence J. Sander, Josemir W. Sills, Graeme J. Striano, Pasquale Zara, Federico van der Palen, Job Krause, Roland Depondt, Chantal Sisodiya, Sanjay M. |
author_sort | Silvennoinen, Katri |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To study the effectiveness and tolerability of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) commonly used in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME). METHODS: People with JME were identified from a large database of individuals with epilepsy, which includes detailed retrospective information on AED use. We assessed secular changes in AED use and calculated rates of response (12‐month seizure freedom) and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) for the five most common AEDs. Retention was modeled with a Cox proportional hazards model. We compared valproate use between males and females. RESULTS: We included 305 people with 688 AED trials of valproate, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, carbamazepine, and topiramate. Valproate and carbamazepine were most often prescribed as the first AED. The response rate to valproate was highest among the five AEDs (42.7%), and significantly higher than response rates for lamotrigine, carbamazepine, and topiramate; the difference to the response rate to levetiracetam (37.1%) was not significant. The rates of ADRs were highest for topiramate (45.5%) and valproate (37.5%). Commonest ADRs included weight change, lethargy, and tremor. In the Cox proportional hazards model, later start year (1.10 [1.08‐1.13], P < 0.001) and female sex (1.41 [1.07‐1.85], P = 0.02) were associated with shorter trial duration. Valproate was associated with the longest treatment duration; trials with carbamazepine and topiramate were significantly shorter (HR [CI]: 3.29 [2.15‐5.02], P < 0.001 and 1.93 [1.31‐2.86], P < 0.001). The relative frequency of valproate trials shows a decreasing trend since 2003 while there is an increasing trend for levetiracetam. Fewer females than males received valproate (76.2% vs 92.6%, P = 0.001). SIGNIFICANCE: In people with JME, valproate is an effective AED; levetiracetam emerged as an alternative. Valproate is now contraindicated in women of childbearing potential without special precautions. With appropriate selection and safeguards in place, valproate should remain available as a therapy, including as an alternative for women of childbearing potential whose seizures are resistant to other treatments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6698679 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66986792019-08-22 Comparative effectiveness of antiepileptic drugs in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy Silvennoinen, Katri de Lange, Nikola Zagaglia, Sara Balestrini, Simona Androsova, Ganna Wassenaar, Merel Auce, Pauls Avbersek, Andreja Becker, Felicitas Berghuis, Bianca Campbell, Ellen Coppola, Antonietta Francis, Ben Wolking, Stefan Cavalleri, Gianpiero L. Craig, John Delanty, Norman Johnson, Michael R. Koeleman, Bobby P. C. Kunz, Wolfram S. Lerche, Holger Marson, Anthony G. O’Brien, Terence J. Sander, Josemir W. Sills, Graeme J. Striano, Pasquale Zara, Federico van der Palen, Job Krause, Roland Depondt, Chantal Sisodiya, Sanjay M. Epilepsia Open Full‐length Original Research OBJECTIVE: To study the effectiveness and tolerability of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) commonly used in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME). METHODS: People with JME were identified from a large database of individuals with epilepsy, which includes detailed retrospective information on AED use. We assessed secular changes in AED use and calculated rates of response (12‐month seizure freedom) and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) for the five most common AEDs. Retention was modeled with a Cox proportional hazards model. We compared valproate use between males and females. RESULTS: We included 305 people with 688 AED trials of valproate, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, carbamazepine, and topiramate. Valproate and carbamazepine were most often prescribed as the first AED. The response rate to valproate was highest among the five AEDs (42.7%), and significantly higher than response rates for lamotrigine, carbamazepine, and topiramate; the difference to the response rate to levetiracetam (37.1%) was not significant. The rates of ADRs were highest for topiramate (45.5%) and valproate (37.5%). Commonest ADRs included weight change, lethargy, and tremor. In the Cox proportional hazards model, later start year (1.10 [1.08‐1.13], P < 0.001) and female sex (1.41 [1.07‐1.85], P = 0.02) were associated with shorter trial duration. Valproate was associated with the longest treatment duration; trials with carbamazepine and topiramate were significantly shorter (HR [CI]: 3.29 [2.15‐5.02], P < 0.001 and 1.93 [1.31‐2.86], P < 0.001). The relative frequency of valproate trials shows a decreasing trend since 2003 while there is an increasing trend for levetiracetam. Fewer females than males received valproate (76.2% vs 92.6%, P = 0.001). SIGNIFICANCE: In people with JME, valproate is an effective AED; levetiracetam emerged as an alternative. Valproate is now contraindicated in women of childbearing potential without special precautions. With appropriate selection and safeguards in place, valproate should remain available as a therapy, including as an alternative for women of childbearing potential whose seizures are resistant to other treatments. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6698679/ /pubmed/31440723 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/epi4.12349 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Epilepsia Open published by Wiley Periodicals Inc. on behalf of International League Against Epilepsy. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Full‐length Original Research Silvennoinen, Katri de Lange, Nikola Zagaglia, Sara Balestrini, Simona Androsova, Ganna Wassenaar, Merel Auce, Pauls Avbersek, Andreja Becker, Felicitas Berghuis, Bianca Campbell, Ellen Coppola, Antonietta Francis, Ben Wolking, Stefan Cavalleri, Gianpiero L. Craig, John Delanty, Norman Johnson, Michael R. Koeleman, Bobby P. C. Kunz, Wolfram S. Lerche, Holger Marson, Anthony G. O’Brien, Terence J. Sander, Josemir W. Sills, Graeme J. Striano, Pasquale Zara, Federico van der Palen, Job Krause, Roland Depondt, Chantal Sisodiya, Sanjay M. Comparative effectiveness of antiepileptic drugs in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy |
title | Comparative effectiveness of antiepileptic drugs in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy |
title_full | Comparative effectiveness of antiepileptic drugs in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy |
title_fullStr | Comparative effectiveness of antiepileptic drugs in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative effectiveness of antiepileptic drugs in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy |
title_short | Comparative effectiveness of antiepileptic drugs in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy |
title_sort | comparative effectiveness of antiepileptic drugs in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy |
topic | Full‐length Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6698679/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31440723 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/epi4.12349 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT silvennoinenkatri comparativeeffectivenessofantiepilepticdrugsinjuvenilemyoclonicepilepsy AT delangenikola comparativeeffectivenessofantiepilepticdrugsinjuvenilemyoclonicepilepsy AT zagagliasara comparativeeffectivenessofantiepilepticdrugsinjuvenilemyoclonicepilepsy AT balestrinisimona comparativeeffectivenessofantiepilepticdrugsinjuvenilemyoclonicepilepsy AT androsovaganna comparativeeffectivenessofantiepilepticdrugsinjuvenilemyoclonicepilepsy AT wassenaarmerel comparativeeffectivenessofantiepilepticdrugsinjuvenilemyoclonicepilepsy AT aucepauls comparativeeffectivenessofantiepilepticdrugsinjuvenilemyoclonicepilepsy AT avbersekandreja comparativeeffectivenessofantiepilepticdrugsinjuvenilemyoclonicepilepsy AT beckerfelicitas comparativeeffectivenessofantiepilepticdrugsinjuvenilemyoclonicepilepsy AT berghuisbianca comparativeeffectivenessofantiepilepticdrugsinjuvenilemyoclonicepilepsy AT campbellellen comparativeeffectivenessofantiepilepticdrugsinjuvenilemyoclonicepilepsy AT coppolaantonietta comparativeeffectivenessofantiepilepticdrugsinjuvenilemyoclonicepilepsy AT francisben comparativeeffectivenessofantiepilepticdrugsinjuvenilemyoclonicepilepsy AT wolkingstefan comparativeeffectivenessofantiepilepticdrugsinjuvenilemyoclonicepilepsy AT cavallerigianpierol comparativeeffectivenessofantiepilepticdrugsinjuvenilemyoclonicepilepsy AT craigjohn comparativeeffectivenessofantiepilepticdrugsinjuvenilemyoclonicepilepsy AT delantynorman comparativeeffectivenessofantiepilepticdrugsinjuvenilemyoclonicepilepsy AT johnsonmichaelr comparativeeffectivenessofantiepilepticdrugsinjuvenilemyoclonicepilepsy AT koelemanbobbypc comparativeeffectivenessofantiepilepticdrugsinjuvenilemyoclonicepilepsy AT kunzwolframs comparativeeffectivenessofantiepilepticdrugsinjuvenilemyoclonicepilepsy AT lercheholger comparativeeffectivenessofantiepilepticdrugsinjuvenilemyoclonicepilepsy AT marsonanthonyg comparativeeffectivenessofantiepilepticdrugsinjuvenilemyoclonicepilepsy AT obrienterencej comparativeeffectivenessofantiepilepticdrugsinjuvenilemyoclonicepilepsy AT sanderjosemirw comparativeeffectivenessofantiepilepticdrugsinjuvenilemyoclonicepilepsy AT sillsgraemej comparativeeffectivenessofantiepilepticdrugsinjuvenilemyoclonicepilepsy AT strianopasquale comparativeeffectivenessofantiepilepticdrugsinjuvenilemyoclonicepilepsy AT zarafederico comparativeeffectivenessofantiepilepticdrugsinjuvenilemyoclonicepilepsy AT vanderpalenjob comparativeeffectivenessofantiepilepticdrugsinjuvenilemyoclonicepilepsy AT krauseroland comparativeeffectivenessofantiepilepticdrugsinjuvenilemyoclonicepilepsy AT depondtchantal comparativeeffectivenessofantiepilepticdrugsinjuvenilemyoclonicepilepsy AT sisodiyasanjaym comparativeeffectivenessofantiepilepticdrugsinjuvenilemyoclonicepilepsy AT comparativeeffectivenessofantiepilepticdrugsinjuvenilemyoclonicepilepsy |