Cargando…

Comparative effectiveness of antiepileptic drugs in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy

OBJECTIVE: To study the effectiveness and tolerability of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) commonly used in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME). METHODS: People with JME were identified from a large database of individuals with epilepsy, which includes detailed retrospective information on AED use. We asses...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Silvennoinen, Katri, de Lange, Nikola, Zagaglia, Sara, Balestrini, Simona, Androsova, Ganna, Wassenaar, Merel, Auce, Pauls, Avbersek, Andreja, Becker, Felicitas, Berghuis, Bianca, Campbell, Ellen, Coppola, Antonietta, Francis, Ben, Wolking, Stefan, Cavalleri, Gianpiero L., Craig, John, Delanty, Norman, Johnson, Michael R., Koeleman, Bobby P. C., Kunz, Wolfram S., Lerche, Holger, Marson, Anthony G., O’Brien, Terence J., Sander, Josemir W., Sills, Graeme J., Striano, Pasquale, Zara, Federico, van der Palen, Job, Krause, Roland, Depondt, Chantal, Sisodiya, Sanjay M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6698679/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31440723
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/epi4.12349
_version_ 1783444593091543040
author Silvennoinen, Katri
de Lange, Nikola
Zagaglia, Sara
Balestrini, Simona
Androsova, Ganna
Wassenaar, Merel
Auce, Pauls
Avbersek, Andreja
Becker, Felicitas
Berghuis, Bianca
Campbell, Ellen
Coppola, Antonietta
Francis, Ben
Wolking, Stefan
Cavalleri, Gianpiero L.
Craig, John
Delanty, Norman
Johnson, Michael R.
Koeleman, Bobby P. C.
Kunz, Wolfram S.
Lerche, Holger
Marson, Anthony G.
O’Brien, Terence J.
Sander, Josemir W.
Sills, Graeme J.
Striano, Pasquale
Zara, Federico
van der Palen, Job
Krause, Roland
Depondt, Chantal
Sisodiya, Sanjay M.
author_facet Silvennoinen, Katri
de Lange, Nikola
Zagaglia, Sara
Balestrini, Simona
Androsova, Ganna
Wassenaar, Merel
Auce, Pauls
Avbersek, Andreja
Becker, Felicitas
Berghuis, Bianca
Campbell, Ellen
Coppola, Antonietta
Francis, Ben
Wolking, Stefan
Cavalleri, Gianpiero L.
Craig, John
Delanty, Norman
Johnson, Michael R.
Koeleman, Bobby P. C.
Kunz, Wolfram S.
Lerche, Holger
Marson, Anthony G.
O’Brien, Terence J.
Sander, Josemir W.
Sills, Graeme J.
Striano, Pasquale
Zara, Federico
van der Palen, Job
Krause, Roland
Depondt, Chantal
Sisodiya, Sanjay M.
author_sort Silvennoinen, Katri
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To study the effectiveness and tolerability of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) commonly used in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME). METHODS: People with JME were identified from a large database of individuals with epilepsy, which includes detailed retrospective information on AED use. We assessed secular changes in AED use and calculated rates of response (12‐month seizure freedom) and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) for the five most common AEDs. Retention was modeled with a Cox proportional hazards model. We compared valproate use between males and females. RESULTS: We included 305 people with 688 AED trials of valproate, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, carbamazepine, and topiramate. Valproate and carbamazepine were most often prescribed as the first AED. The response rate to valproate was highest among the five AEDs (42.7%), and significantly higher than response rates for lamotrigine, carbamazepine, and topiramate; the difference to the response rate to levetiracetam (37.1%) was not significant. The rates of ADRs were highest for topiramate (45.5%) and valproate (37.5%). Commonest ADRs included weight change, lethargy, and tremor. In the Cox proportional hazards model, later start year (1.10 [1.08‐1.13], P < 0.001) and female sex (1.41 [1.07‐1.85], P = 0.02) were associated with shorter trial duration. Valproate was associated with the longest treatment duration; trials with carbamazepine and topiramate were significantly shorter (HR [CI]: 3.29 [2.15‐5.02], P < 0.001 and 1.93 [1.31‐2.86], P < 0.001). The relative frequency of valproate trials shows a decreasing trend since 2003 while there is an increasing trend for levetiracetam. Fewer females than males received valproate (76.2% vs 92.6%, P = 0.001). SIGNIFICANCE: In people with JME, valproate is an effective AED; levetiracetam emerged as an alternative. Valproate is now contraindicated in women of childbearing potential without special precautions. With appropriate selection and safeguards in place, valproate should remain available as a therapy, including as an alternative for women of childbearing potential whose seizures are resistant to other treatments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6698679
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66986792019-08-22 Comparative effectiveness of antiepileptic drugs in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy Silvennoinen, Katri de Lange, Nikola Zagaglia, Sara Balestrini, Simona Androsova, Ganna Wassenaar, Merel Auce, Pauls Avbersek, Andreja Becker, Felicitas Berghuis, Bianca Campbell, Ellen Coppola, Antonietta Francis, Ben Wolking, Stefan Cavalleri, Gianpiero L. Craig, John Delanty, Norman Johnson, Michael R. Koeleman, Bobby P. C. Kunz, Wolfram S. Lerche, Holger Marson, Anthony G. O’Brien, Terence J. Sander, Josemir W. Sills, Graeme J. Striano, Pasquale Zara, Federico van der Palen, Job Krause, Roland Depondt, Chantal Sisodiya, Sanjay M. Epilepsia Open Full‐length Original Research OBJECTIVE: To study the effectiveness and tolerability of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) commonly used in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME). METHODS: People with JME were identified from a large database of individuals with epilepsy, which includes detailed retrospective information on AED use. We assessed secular changes in AED use and calculated rates of response (12‐month seizure freedom) and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) for the five most common AEDs. Retention was modeled with a Cox proportional hazards model. We compared valproate use between males and females. RESULTS: We included 305 people with 688 AED trials of valproate, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, carbamazepine, and topiramate. Valproate and carbamazepine were most often prescribed as the first AED. The response rate to valproate was highest among the five AEDs (42.7%), and significantly higher than response rates for lamotrigine, carbamazepine, and topiramate; the difference to the response rate to levetiracetam (37.1%) was not significant. The rates of ADRs were highest for topiramate (45.5%) and valproate (37.5%). Commonest ADRs included weight change, lethargy, and tremor. In the Cox proportional hazards model, later start year (1.10 [1.08‐1.13], P < 0.001) and female sex (1.41 [1.07‐1.85], P = 0.02) were associated with shorter trial duration. Valproate was associated with the longest treatment duration; trials with carbamazepine and topiramate were significantly shorter (HR [CI]: 3.29 [2.15‐5.02], P < 0.001 and 1.93 [1.31‐2.86], P < 0.001). The relative frequency of valproate trials shows a decreasing trend since 2003 while there is an increasing trend for levetiracetam. Fewer females than males received valproate (76.2% vs 92.6%, P = 0.001). SIGNIFICANCE: In people with JME, valproate is an effective AED; levetiracetam emerged as an alternative. Valproate is now contraindicated in women of childbearing potential without special precautions. With appropriate selection and safeguards in place, valproate should remain available as a therapy, including as an alternative for women of childbearing potential whose seizures are resistant to other treatments. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6698679/ /pubmed/31440723 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/epi4.12349 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Epilepsia Open published by Wiley Periodicals Inc. on behalf of International League Against Epilepsy. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Full‐length Original Research
Silvennoinen, Katri
de Lange, Nikola
Zagaglia, Sara
Balestrini, Simona
Androsova, Ganna
Wassenaar, Merel
Auce, Pauls
Avbersek, Andreja
Becker, Felicitas
Berghuis, Bianca
Campbell, Ellen
Coppola, Antonietta
Francis, Ben
Wolking, Stefan
Cavalleri, Gianpiero L.
Craig, John
Delanty, Norman
Johnson, Michael R.
Koeleman, Bobby P. C.
Kunz, Wolfram S.
Lerche, Holger
Marson, Anthony G.
O’Brien, Terence J.
Sander, Josemir W.
Sills, Graeme J.
Striano, Pasquale
Zara, Federico
van der Palen, Job
Krause, Roland
Depondt, Chantal
Sisodiya, Sanjay M.
Comparative effectiveness of antiepileptic drugs in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy
title Comparative effectiveness of antiepileptic drugs in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy
title_full Comparative effectiveness of antiepileptic drugs in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy
title_fullStr Comparative effectiveness of antiepileptic drugs in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy
title_full_unstemmed Comparative effectiveness of antiepileptic drugs in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy
title_short Comparative effectiveness of antiepileptic drugs in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy
title_sort comparative effectiveness of antiepileptic drugs in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy
topic Full‐length Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6698679/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31440723
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/epi4.12349
work_keys_str_mv AT silvennoinenkatri comparativeeffectivenessofantiepilepticdrugsinjuvenilemyoclonicepilepsy
AT delangenikola comparativeeffectivenessofantiepilepticdrugsinjuvenilemyoclonicepilepsy
AT zagagliasara comparativeeffectivenessofantiepilepticdrugsinjuvenilemyoclonicepilepsy
AT balestrinisimona comparativeeffectivenessofantiepilepticdrugsinjuvenilemyoclonicepilepsy
AT androsovaganna comparativeeffectivenessofantiepilepticdrugsinjuvenilemyoclonicepilepsy
AT wassenaarmerel comparativeeffectivenessofantiepilepticdrugsinjuvenilemyoclonicepilepsy
AT aucepauls comparativeeffectivenessofantiepilepticdrugsinjuvenilemyoclonicepilepsy
AT avbersekandreja comparativeeffectivenessofantiepilepticdrugsinjuvenilemyoclonicepilepsy
AT beckerfelicitas comparativeeffectivenessofantiepilepticdrugsinjuvenilemyoclonicepilepsy
AT berghuisbianca comparativeeffectivenessofantiepilepticdrugsinjuvenilemyoclonicepilepsy
AT campbellellen comparativeeffectivenessofantiepilepticdrugsinjuvenilemyoclonicepilepsy
AT coppolaantonietta comparativeeffectivenessofantiepilepticdrugsinjuvenilemyoclonicepilepsy
AT francisben comparativeeffectivenessofantiepilepticdrugsinjuvenilemyoclonicepilepsy
AT wolkingstefan comparativeeffectivenessofantiepilepticdrugsinjuvenilemyoclonicepilepsy
AT cavallerigianpierol comparativeeffectivenessofantiepilepticdrugsinjuvenilemyoclonicepilepsy
AT craigjohn comparativeeffectivenessofantiepilepticdrugsinjuvenilemyoclonicepilepsy
AT delantynorman comparativeeffectivenessofantiepilepticdrugsinjuvenilemyoclonicepilepsy
AT johnsonmichaelr comparativeeffectivenessofantiepilepticdrugsinjuvenilemyoclonicepilepsy
AT koelemanbobbypc comparativeeffectivenessofantiepilepticdrugsinjuvenilemyoclonicepilepsy
AT kunzwolframs comparativeeffectivenessofantiepilepticdrugsinjuvenilemyoclonicepilepsy
AT lercheholger comparativeeffectivenessofantiepilepticdrugsinjuvenilemyoclonicepilepsy
AT marsonanthonyg comparativeeffectivenessofantiepilepticdrugsinjuvenilemyoclonicepilepsy
AT obrienterencej comparativeeffectivenessofantiepilepticdrugsinjuvenilemyoclonicepilepsy
AT sanderjosemirw comparativeeffectivenessofantiepilepticdrugsinjuvenilemyoclonicepilepsy
AT sillsgraemej comparativeeffectivenessofantiepilepticdrugsinjuvenilemyoclonicepilepsy
AT strianopasquale comparativeeffectivenessofantiepilepticdrugsinjuvenilemyoclonicepilepsy
AT zarafederico comparativeeffectivenessofantiepilepticdrugsinjuvenilemyoclonicepilepsy
AT vanderpalenjob comparativeeffectivenessofantiepilepticdrugsinjuvenilemyoclonicepilepsy
AT krauseroland comparativeeffectivenessofantiepilepticdrugsinjuvenilemyoclonicepilepsy
AT depondtchantal comparativeeffectivenessofantiepilepticdrugsinjuvenilemyoclonicepilepsy
AT sisodiyasanjaym comparativeeffectivenessofantiepilepticdrugsinjuvenilemyoclonicepilepsy
AT comparativeeffectivenessofantiepilepticdrugsinjuvenilemyoclonicepilepsy