Cargando…
Can automated treatment plans gain traction in the clinic?
Recently, there has been an increased interest in the feasibility and impact of automation within the field of medical dosimetry. While there have been many commercialized solutions for automatic treatment planning, the use of an application programming interface to achieve complete plan generation...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6698763/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31313508 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12674 |
_version_ | 1783444610211643392 |
---|---|
author | Amaloo, Christopher Hayes, Lane Manning, Matthew Liu, Han Wiant, David |
author_facet | Amaloo, Christopher Hayes, Lane Manning, Matthew Liu, Han Wiant, David |
author_sort | Amaloo, Christopher |
collection | PubMed |
description | Recently, there has been an increased interest in the feasibility and impact of automation within the field of medical dosimetry. While there have been many commercialized solutions for automatic treatment planning, the use of an application programming interface to achieve complete plan generation for specific treatment sites is a process only recently available for certain commercial vendors. Automatic plan generation for 20 prostate patients was achieved via a stand‐alone automated planning script that accessed a knowledge‐based planning solution. Differences between the auto plans and clinically treated, baseline plans were analyzed and compared. The planning script successfully initialized a treatment plan, accessed the knowledge‐based planning model, optimized the plan, assessed for constraint compliance, and normalized the treatment plan for maximal coverage while meeting constraints. Compared to baseline plans, the auto‐generated plans showed significantly improved rectal sparing with similar coverage for targets and comparable doses to the remaining organs‐at‐risk. Utilization of a script, with its associated time saving and integrated process management, can quickly and automatically generate an acceptable clinical treatment plan for prostate cancer with either improved or similar results compared to a manually created plan. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6698763 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66987632019-08-22 Can automated treatment plans gain traction in the clinic? Amaloo, Christopher Hayes, Lane Manning, Matthew Liu, Han Wiant, David J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics Recently, there has been an increased interest in the feasibility and impact of automation within the field of medical dosimetry. While there have been many commercialized solutions for automatic treatment planning, the use of an application programming interface to achieve complete plan generation for specific treatment sites is a process only recently available for certain commercial vendors. Automatic plan generation for 20 prostate patients was achieved via a stand‐alone automated planning script that accessed a knowledge‐based planning solution. Differences between the auto plans and clinically treated, baseline plans were analyzed and compared. The planning script successfully initialized a treatment plan, accessed the knowledge‐based planning model, optimized the plan, assessed for constraint compliance, and normalized the treatment plan for maximal coverage while meeting constraints. Compared to baseline plans, the auto‐generated plans showed significantly improved rectal sparing with similar coverage for targets and comparable doses to the remaining organs‐at‐risk. Utilization of a script, with its associated time saving and integrated process management, can quickly and automatically generate an acceptable clinical treatment plan for prostate cancer with either improved or similar results compared to a manually created plan. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6698763/ /pubmed/31313508 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12674 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Amaloo, Christopher Hayes, Lane Manning, Matthew Liu, Han Wiant, David Can automated treatment plans gain traction in the clinic? |
title | Can automated treatment plans gain traction in the clinic? |
title_full | Can automated treatment plans gain traction in the clinic? |
title_fullStr | Can automated treatment plans gain traction in the clinic? |
title_full_unstemmed | Can automated treatment plans gain traction in the clinic? |
title_short | Can automated treatment plans gain traction in the clinic? |
title_sort | can automated treatment plans gain traction in the clinic? |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6698763/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31313508 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12674 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT amaloochristopher canautomatedtreatmentplansgaintractionintheclinic AT hayeslane canautomatedtreatmentplansgaintractionintheclinic AT manningmatthew canautomatedtreatmentplansgaintractionintheclinic AT liuhan canautomatedtreatmentplansgaintractionintheclinic AT wiantdavid canautomatedtreatmentplansgaintractionintheclinic |