Cargando…

Can automated treatment plans gain traction in the clinic?

Recently, there has been an increased interest in the feasibility and impact of automation within the field of medical dosimetry. While there have been many commercialized solutions for automatic treatment planning, the use of an application programming interface to achieve complete plan generation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Amaloo, Christopher, Hayes, Lane, Manning, Matthew, Liu, Han, Wiant, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6698763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31313508
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12674
_version_ 1783444610211643392
author Amaloo, Christopher
Hayes, Lane
Manning, Matthew
Liu, Han
Wiant, David
author_facet Amaloo, Christopher
Hayes, Lane
Manning, Matthew
Liu, Han
Wiant, David
author_sort Amaloo, Christopher
collection PubMed
description Recently, there has been an increased interest in the feasibility and impact of automation within the field of medical dosimetry. While there have been many commercialized solutions for automatic treatment planning, the use of an application programming interface to achieve complete plan generation for specific treatment sites is a process only recently available for certain commercial vendors. Automatic plan generation for 20 prostate patients was achieved via a stand‐alone automated planning script that accessed a knowledge‐based planning solution. Differences between the auto plans and clinically treated, baseline plans were analyzed and compared. The planning script successfully initialized a treatment plan, accessed the knowledge‐based planning model, optimized the plan, assessed for constraint compliance, and normalized the treatment plan for maximal coverage while meeting constraints. Compared to baseline plans, the auto‐generated plans showed significantly improved rectal sparing with similar coverage for targets and comparable doses to the remaining organs‐at‐risk. Utilization of a script, with its associated time saving and integrated process management, can quickly and automatically generate an acceptable clinical treatment plan for prostate cancer with either improved or similar results compared to a manually created plan.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6698763
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66987632019-08-22 Can automated treatment plans gain traction in the clinic? Amaloo, Christopher Hayes, Lane Manning, Matthew Liu, Han Wiant, David J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics Recently, there has been an increased interest in the feasibility and impact of automation within the field of medical dosimetry. While there have been many commercialized solutions for automatic treatment planning, the use of an application programming interface to achieve complete plan generation for specific treatment sites is a process only recently available for certain commercial vendors. Automatic plan generation for 20 prostate patients was achieved via a stand‐alone automated planning script that accessed a knowledge‐based planning solution. Differences between the auto plans and clinically treated, baseline plans were analyzed and compared. The planning script successfully initialized a treatment plan, accessed the knowledge‐based planning model, optimized the plan, assessed for constraint compliance, and normalized the treatment plan for maximal coverage while meeting constraints. Compared to baseline plans, the auto‐generated plans showed significantly improved rectal sparing with similar coverage for targets and comparable doses to the remaining organs‐at‐risk. Utilization of a script, with its associated time saving and integrated process management, can quickly and automatically generate an acceptable clinical treatment plan for prostate cancer with either improved or similar results compared to a manually created plan. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6698763/ /pubmed/31313508 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12674 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Amaloo, Christopher
Hayes, Lane
Manning, Matthew
Liu, Han
Wiant, David
Can automated treatment plans gain traction in the clinic?
title Can automated treatment plans gain traction in the clinic?
title_full Can automated treatment plans gain traction in the clinic?
title_fullStr Can automated treatment plans gain traction in the clinic?
title_full_unstemmed Can automated treatment plans gain traction in the clinic?
title_short Can automated treatment plans gain traction in the clinic?
title_sort can automated treatment plans gain traction in the clinic?
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6698763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31313508
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12674
work_keys_str_mv AT amaloochristopher canautomatedtreatmentplansgaintractionintheclinic
AT hayeslane canautomatedtreatmentplansgaintractionintheclinic
AT manningmatthew canautomatedtreatmentplansgaintractionintheclinic
AT liuhan canautomatedtreatmentplansgaintractionintheclinic
AT wiantdavid canautomatedtreatmentplansgaintractionintheclinic