Cargando…
Comparison of the Performance of Three Blood Culture Systems in a Chinese Tertiary-Care Hospital
In this study, we evaluated the performance of three blood culture systems in a Chinese tertiary-care hospital. Samples of simulated bacteremia were prepared using 10 mL of fresh blood from healthy humans and bacterial suspensions of known cell density. Portions of the specimens were treated with an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6698792/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31456951 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2019.00285 |
_version_ | 1783444615305625600 |
---|---|
author | Li, Guanlin Sun, Jingjing Pan, Shoucheng Li, Wenti Zhang, Shijie Wang, Yongfeng Sun, Xiaoxu Xu, Hui Ming, Liang |
author_facet | Li, Guanlin Sun, Jingjing Pan, Shoucheng Li, Wenti Zhang, Shijie Wang, Yongfeng Sun, Xiaoxu Xu, Hui Ming, Liang |
author_sort | Li, Guanlin |
collection | PubMed |
description | In this study, we evaluated the performance of three blood culture systems in a Chinese tertiary-care hospital. Samples of simulated bacteremia were prepared using 10 mL of fresh blood from healthy humans and bacterial suspensions of known cell density. Portions of the specimens were treated with an antibiotic or antifungal drug at specified concentrations to simulate antibacterial drug treatment. We analyzed three blood culture systems: BACTEC Plus, BacT/Alert, and VersaTREK. Both time-to-detection (TTD) of 10 types of bacteria and five types of yeasts in samples without antibiotic treatment and positive detection rate of samples treated with different concentrations of antibiotic or antifungal drugs were compared among the culture systems. We also retrospectively analyzed the use of the culture systems in our hospital from 2015 to 2018. In the simulated study, in the absence of antibiotics, the VersaTREK REDOX 1 displayed the shortest TTD for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Haemophilus influenzae, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Candida albicans, and Candida glabrata (P < 0.001). Among the anaerobically cultured samples, BACTEC lytic/10 anaerobic/F displayed the shortest TTD for Escherichia coli, S. aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, S. pneumoniae, Bacteroides fragilis, and Bacteroides vulgatus (P < 0.001). Comparatively, BacT/Alert FA/FN showed no advantages. In antibiotic-treated samples, overall recovery rates for the BACTEC, BacT/Alert, and VersaTREK systems were, were 70.2, 43.7, and 27.4%, respectively. BACTEC facilitated higher recovery rate than the other two systems (P < 0.001). In antifungal treatment, the overall recovery rates for the BACTEC, BacT/Alert, and VersaTREK systems were 93.9, 98.3, and 69.4%, respectively. BACTEC Plus showed a recovery rate comparable to that of BacT/Alert (P = 0.835), and the recovery rate of both these systems was higher than that of VersaTREK (P < 0.001). The TTD values and positive rates determined in the retrospective study were consistent with those obtained in the simulated study. The combination of BACTEC PLUS Aerobic/F and BACTEC lytic/10 anaerobic/F culture systems displayed the best clinical performance. Furthermore, the BacT/Alert FAN culture system was found to be more resistant to antifungal drugs and levofloxacin, whereas the VersaTREK system is considered more suitable for primary blood cultures without antibiotic supplementation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6698792 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66987922019-08-27 Comparison of the Performance of Three Blood Culture Systems in a Chinese Tertiary-Care Hospital Li, Guanlin Sun, Jingjing Pan, Shoucheng Li, Wenti Zhang, Shijie Wang, Yongfeng Sun, Xiaoxu Xu, Hui Ming, Liang Front Cell Infect Microbiol Cellular and Infection Microbiology In this study, we evaluated the performance of three blood culture systems in a Chinese tertiary-care hospital. Samples of simulated bacteremia were prepared using 10 mL of fresh blood from healthy humans and bacterial suspensions of known cell density. Portions of the specimens were treated with an antibiotic or antifungal drug at specified concentrations to simulate antibacterial drug treatment. We analyzed three blood culture systems: BACTEC Plus, BacT/Alert, and VersaTREK. Both time-to-detection (TTD) of 10 types of bacteria and five types of yeasts in samples without antibiotic treatment and positive detection rate of samples treated with different concentrations of antibiotic or antifungal drugs were compared among the culture systems. We also retrospectively analyzed the use of the culture systems in our hospital from 2015 to 2018. In the simulated study, in the absence of antibiotics, the VersaTREK REDOX 1 displayed the shortest TTD for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Haemophilus influenzae, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Candida albicans, and Candida glabrata (P < 0.001). Among the anaerobically cultured samples, BACTEC lytic/10 anaerobic/F displayed the shortest TTD for Escherichia coli, S. aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, S. pneumoniae, Bacteroides fragilis, and Bacteroides vulgatus (P < 0.001). Comparatively, BacT/Alert FA/FN showed no advantages. In antibiotic-treated samples, overall recovery rates for the BACTEC, BacT/Alert, and VersaTREK systems were, were 70.2, 43.7, and 27.4%, respectively. BACTEC facilitated higher recovery rate than the other two systems (P < 0.001). In antifungal treatment, the overall recovery rates for the BACTEC, BacT/Alert, and VersaTREK systems were 93.9, 98.3, and 69.4%, respectively. BACTEC Plus showed a recovery rate comparable to that of BacT/Alert (P = 0.835), and the recovery rate of both these systems was higher than that of VersaTREK (P < 0.001). The TTD values and positive rates determined in the retrospective study were consistent with those obtained in the simulated study. The combination of BACTEC PLUS Aerobic/F and BACTEC lytic/10 anaerobic/F culture systems displayed the best clinical performance. Furthermore, the BacT/Alert FAN culture system was found to be more resistant to antifungal drugs and levofloxacin, whereas the VersaTREK system is considered more suitable for primary blood cultures without antibiotic supplementation. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6698792/ /pubmed/31456951 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2019.00285 Text en Copyright © 2019 Li, Sun, Pan, Li, Zhang, Wang, Sun, Xu and Ming. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Cellular and Infection Microbiology Li, Guanlin Sun, Jingjing Pan, Shoucheng Li, Wenti Zhang, Shijie Wang, Yongfeng Sun, Xiaoxu Xu, Hui Ming, Liang Comparison of the Performance of Three Blood Culture Systems in a Chinese Tertiary-Care Hospital |
title | Comparison of the Performance of Three Blood Culture Systems in a Chinese Tertiary-Care Hospital |
title_full | Comparison of the Performance of Three Blood Culture Systems in a Chinese Tertiary-Care Hospital |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the Performance of Three Blood Culture Systems in a Chinese Tertiary-Care Hospital |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the Performance of Three Blood Culture Systems in a Chinese Tertiary-Care Hospital |
title_short | Comparison of the Performance of Three Blood Culture Systems in a Chinese Tertiary-Care Hospital |
title_sort | comparison of the performance of three blood culture systems in a chinese tertiary-care hospital |
topic | Cellular and Infection Microbiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6698792/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31456951 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2019.00285 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liguanlin comparisonoftheperformanceofthreebloodculturesystemsinachinesetertiarycarehospital AT sunjingjing comparisonoftheperformanceofthreebloodculturesystemsinachinesetertiarycarehospital AT panshoucheng comparisonoftheperformanceofthreebloodculturesystemsinachinesetertiarycarehospital AT liwenti comparisonoftheperformanceofthreebloodculturesystemsinachinesetertiarycarehospital AT zhangshijie comparisonoftheperformanceofthreebloodculturesystemsinachinesetertiarycarehospital AT wangyongfeng comparisonoftheperformanceofthreebloodculturesystemsinachinesetertiarycarehospital AT sunxiaoxu comparisonoftheperformanceofthreebloodculturesystemsinachinesetertiarycarehospital AT xuhui comparisonoftheperformanceofthreebloodculturesystemsinachinesetertiarycarehospital AT mingliang comparisonoftheperformanceofthreebloodculturesystemsinachinesetertiarycarehospital |