Cargando…

Comparison of the Performance of Three Blood Culture Systems in a Chinese Tertiary-Care Hospital

In this study, we evaluated the performance of three blood culture systems in a Chinese tertiary-care hospital. Samples of simulated bacteremia were prepared using 10 mL of fresh blood from healthy humans and bacterial suspensions of known cell density. Portions of the specimens were treated with an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Guanlin, Sun, Jingjing, Pan, Shoucheng, Li, Wenti, Zhang, Shijie, Wang, Yongfeng, Sun, Xiaoxu, Xu, Hui, Ming, Liang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6698792/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31456951
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2019.00285
_version_ 1783444615305625600
author Li, Guanlin
Sun, Jingjing
Pan, Shoucheng
Li, Wenti
Zhang, Shijie
Wang, Yongfeng
Sun, Xiaoxu
Xu, Hui
Ming, Liang
author_facet Li, Guanlin
Sun, Jingjing
Pan, Shoucheng
Li, Wenti
Zhang, Shijie
Wang, Yongfeng
Sun, Xiaoxu
Xu, Hui
Ming, Liang
author_sort Li, Guanlin
collection PubMed
description In this study, we evaluated the performance of three blood culture systems in a Chinese tertiary-care hospital. Samples of simulated bacteremia were prepared using 10 mL of fresh blood from healthy humans and bacterial suspensions of known cell density. Portions of the specimens were treated with an antibiotic or antifungal drug at specified concentrations to simulate antibacterial drug treatment. We analyzed three blood culture systems: BACTEC Plus, BacT/Alert, and VersaTREK. Both time-to-detection (TTD) of 10 types of bacteria and five types of yeasts in samples without antibiotic treatment and positive detection rate of samples treated with different concentrations of antibiotic or antifungal drugs were compared among the culture systems. We also retrospectively analyzed the use of the culture systems in our hospital from 2015 to 2018. In the simulated study, in the absence of antibiotics, the VersaTREK REDOX 1 displayed the shortest TTD for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Haemophilus influenzae, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Candida albicans, and Candida glabrata (P < 0.001). Among the anaerobically cultured samples, BACTEC lytic/10 anaerobic/F displayed the shortest TTD for Escherichia coli, S. aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, S. pneumoniae, Bacteroides fragilis, and Bacteroides vulgatus (P < 0.001). Comparatively, BacT/Alert FA/FN showed no advantages. In antibiotic-treated samples, overall recovery rates for the BACTEC, BacT/Alert, and VersaTREK systems were, were 70.2, 43.7, and 27.4%, respectively. BACTEC facilitated higher recovery rate than the other two systems (P < 0.001). In antifungal treatment, the overall recovery rates for the BACTEC, BacT/Alert, and VersaTREK systems were 93.9, 98.3, and 69.4%, respectively. BACTEC Plus showed a recovery rate comparable to that of BacT/Alert (P = 0.835), and the recovery rate of both these systems was higher than that of VersaTREK (P < 0.001). The TTD values and positive rates determined in the retrospective study were consistent with those obtained in the simulated study. The combination of BACTEC PLUS Aerobic/F and BACTEC lytic/10 anaerobic/F culture systems displayed the best clinical performance. Furthermore, the BacT/Alert FAN culture system was found to be more resistant to antifungal drugs and levofloxacin, whereas the VersaTREK system is considered more suitable for primary blood cultures without antibiotic supplementation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6698792
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66987922019-08-27 Comparison of the Performance of Three Blood Culture Systems in a Chinese Tertiary-Care Hospital Li, Guanlin Sun, Jingjing Pan, Shoucheng Li, Wenti Zhang, Shijie Wang, Yongfeng Sun, Xiaoxu Xu, Hui Ming, Liang Front Cell Infect Microbiol Cellular and Infection Microbiology In this study, we evaluated the performance of three blood culture systems in a Chinese tertiary-care hospital. Samples of simulated bacteremia were prepared using 10 mL of fresh blood from healthy humans and bacterial suspensions of known cell density. Portions of the specimens were treated with an antibiotic or antifungal drug at specified concentrations to simulate antibacterial drug treatment. We analyzed three blood culture systems: BACTEC Plus, BacT/Alert, and VersaTREK. Both time-to-detection (TTD) of 10 types of bacteria and five types of yeasts in samples without antibiotic treatment and positive detection rate of samples treated with different concentrations of antibiotic or antifungal drugs were compared among the culture systems. We also retrospectively analyzed the use of the culture systems in our hospital from 2015 to 2018. In the simulated study, in the absence of antibiotics, the VersaTREK REDOX 1 displayed the shortest TTD for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Haemophilus influenzae, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Candida albicans, and Candida glabrata (P < 0.001). Among the anaerobically cultured samples, BACTEC lytic/10 anaerobic/F displayed the shortest TTD for Escherichia coli, S. aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, S. pneumoniae, Bacteroides fragilis, and Bacteroides vulgatus (P < 0.001). Comparatively, BacT/Alert FA/FN showed no advantages. In antibiotic-treated samples, overall recovery rates for the BACTEC, BacT/Alert, and VersaTREK systems were, were 70.2, 43.7, and 27.4%, respectively. BACTEC facilitated higher recovery rate than the other two systems (P < 0.001). In antifungal treatment, the overall recovery rates for the BACTEC, BacT/Alert, and VersaTREK systems were 93.9, 98.3, and 69.4%, respectively. BACTEC Plus showed a recovery rate comparable to that of BacT/Alert (P = 0.835), and the recovery rate of both these systems was higher than that of VersaTREK (P < 0.001). The TTD values and positive rates determined in the retrospective study were consistent with those obtained in the simulated study. The combination of BACTEC PLUS Aerobic/F and BACTEC lytic/10 anaerobic/F culture systems displayed the best clinical performance. Furthermore, the BacT/Alert FAN culture system was found to be more resistant to antifungal drugs and levofloxacin, whereas the VersaTREK system is considered more suitable for primary blood cultures without antibiotic supplementation. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6698792/ /pubmed/31456951 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2019.00285 Text en Copyright © 2019 Li, Sun, Pan, Li, Zhang, Wang, Sun, Xu and Ming. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cellular and Infection Microbiology
Li, Guanlin
Sun, Jingjing
Pan, Shoucheng
Li, Wenti
Zhang, Shijie
Wang, Yongfeng
Sun, Xiaoxu
Xu, Hui
Ming, Liang
Comparison of the Performance of Three Blood Culture Systems in a Chinese Tertiary-Care Hospital
title Comparison of the Performance of Three Blood Culture Systems in a Chinese Tertiary-Care Hospital
title_full Comparison of the Performance of Three Blood Culture Systems in a Chinese Tertiary-Care Hospital
title_fullStr Comparison of the Performance of Three Blood Culture Systems in a Chinese Tertiary-Care Hospital
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Performance of Three Blood Culture Systems in a Chinese Tertiary-Care Hospital
title_short Comparison of the Performance of Three Blood Culture Systems in a Chinese Tertiary-Care Hospital
title_sort comparison of the performance of three blood culture systems in a chinese tertiary-care hospital
topic Cellular and Infection Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6698792/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31456951
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2019.00285
work_keys_str_mv AT liguanlin comparisonoftheperformanceofthreebloodculturesystemsinachinesetertiarycarehospital
AT sunjingjing comparisonoftheperformanceofthreebloodculturesystemsinachinesetertiarycarehospital
AT panshoucheng comparisonoftheperformanceofthreebloodculturesystemsinachinesetertiarycarehospital
AT liwenti comparisonoftheperformanceofthreebloodculturesystemsinachinesetertiarycarehospital
AT zhangshijie comparisonoftheperformanceofthreebloodculturesystemsinachinesetertiarycarehospital
AT wangyongfeng comparisonoftheperformanceofthreebloodculturesystemsinachinesetertiarycarehospital
AT sunxiaoxu comparisonoftheperformanceofthreebloodculturesystemsinachinesetertiarycarehospital
AT xuhui comparisonoftheperformanceofthreebloodculturesystemsinachinesetertiarycarehospital
AT mingliang comparisonoftheperformanceofthreebloodculturesystemsinachinesetertiarycarehospital