Cargando…
Three IMRT advanced planning tools: A multi‐institutional side‐by‐side comparison
PURPOSE: To assess three advanced radiation therapy treatment planning tools on the intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) quality and consistency when compared to the clinically approved plans, referred as manual plans, which were planned without using any of these advanced planning tools. MA...
Autores principales: | Lu, Lan, Sheng, Yang, Donaghue, Jeremy, Liu Shen, Zhilei, Kolar, Matt, Wu, Q. Jackie, Xia, Ping |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6698808/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31364798 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12679 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Evaluation of auto‐planning in IMRT and VMAT for head and neck cancer
por: Ouyang, Zi, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Evaluation of fluence‐smoothing feature for three IMRT planning systems
por: Anker, Christopher J., et al.
Publicado: (2010) -
Impact of dose calculation accuracy during optimization on lung IMRT plan quality
por: Li, Ying, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
On correlations in IMRT planning aims
por: Roy, Arkajyoti, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
IMRT QA using machine learning: A multi‐institutional validation
por: Valdes, Gilmer, et al.
Publicado: (2017)