Cargando…
Current Controversies in Lupus Anticoagulant Detection
Antiphospholipid syndrome is an autoimmune, acquired thrombophilia diagnosed when vascular thrombosis or pregnancy morbidity are accompanied by persistent antiphospholipid antibodies. Lupus anticoagulants (LA) are one of the criteria antibodies but calibration plasmas are unavailable and they are de...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6698846/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31558003 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antib5040022 |
_version_ | 1783444626698403840 |
---|---|
author | Moore, Gary W. |
author_facet | Moore, Gary W. |
author_sort | Moore, Gary W. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Antiphospholipid syndrome is an autoimmune, acquired thrombophilia diagnosed when vascular thrombosis or pregnancy morbidity are accompanied by persistent antiphospholipid antibodies. Lupus anticoagulants (LA) are one of the criteria antibodies but calibration plasmas are unavailable and they are detected by inference based on antibody behaviour in a medley of coagulation-based assays. Elevated screening tests suggest the presence of a LA, which is confirmed with mixing tests to evidence inhibition and confirmatory tests to demonstrate phospholipid-dependence. At least two screening tests of different principle must be used to account for antibody heterogeneity and controversy exists on whether assays, in addition to dilute Russell’s viper venom time and activated partial thromboplastin time, should be employed. A variety of approaches to raw data manipulation and interpretation attract debate, as does inclusion or exclusion of mixing studies in circumstances where the presence of a LA is already evident from other results. Therapeutic anticoagulation compromises coagulation-based assays but careful data interpretation and use of alternative reagents can detect or exclude LA in specific circumstances, and this aspect of LA detection continues to evolve. This review focuses on the main areas of debate in LA detection. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6698846 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66988462019-09-05 Current Controversies in Lupus Anticoagulant Detection Moore, Gary W. Antibodies (Basel) Review Antiphospholipid syndrome is an autoimmune, acquired thrombophilia diagnosed when vascular thrombosis or pregnancy morbidity are accompanied by persistent antiphospholipid antibodies. Lupus anticoagulants (LA) are one of the criteria antibodies but calibration plasmas are unavailable and they are detected by inference based on antibody behaviour in a medley of coagulation-based assays. Elevated screening tests suggest the presence of a LA, which is confirmed with mixing tests to evidence inhibition and confirmatory tests to demonstrate phospholipid-dependence. At least two screening tests of different principle must be used to account for antibody heterogeneity and controversy exists on whether assays, in addition to dilute Russell’s viper venom time and activated partial thromboplastin time, should be employed. A variety of approaches to raw data manipulation and interpretation attract debate, as does inclusion or exclusion of mixing studies in circumstances where the presence of a LA is already evident from other results. Therapeutic anticoagulation compromises coagulation-based assays but careful data interpretation and use of alternative reagents can detect or exclude LA in specific circumstances, and this aspect of LA detection continues to evolve. This review focuses on the main areas of debate in LA detection. MDPI 2016-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6698846/ /pubmed/31558003 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antib5040022 Text en © 2016 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Moore, Gary W. Current Controversies in Lupus Anticoagulant Detection |
title | Current Controversies in Lupus Anticoagulant Detection |
title_full | Current Controversies in Lupus Anticoagulant Detection |
title_fullStr | Current Controversies in Lupus Anticoagulant Detection |
title_full_unstemmed | Current Controversies in Lupus Anticoagulant Detection |
title_short | Current Controversies in Lupus Anticoagulant Detection |
title_sort | current controversies in lupus anticoagulant detection |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6698846/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31558003 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antib5040022 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mooregaryw currentcontroversiesinlupusanticoagulantdetection |