Cargando…

Langenskiöld Classification for Blount Disease: Is It Reliable?

BACKGROUNDS: Blount disease (BD) is a developmental disease which medial part of the proximal tibial physis resulting genu varum. Plain radiographs are necessary for diagnosis. For this purpose, Langenskiöld classification is used. There are not enough data about Langenskiöld classification's r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Erkus, Serkan, Turgut, Ali, Kalenderer, Onder
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6699207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31488937
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_679_18
_version_ 1783444673458601984
author Erkus, Serkan
Turgut, Ali
Kalenderer, Onder
author_facet Erkus, Serkan
Turgut, Ali
Kalenderer, Onder
author_sort Erkus, Serkan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUNDS: Blount disease (BD) is a developmental disease which medial part of the proximal tibial physis resulting genu varum. Plain radiographs are necessary for diagnosis. For this purpose, Langenskiöld classification is used. There are not enough data about Langenskiöld classification's reliability in the English literature. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the intra- and inter-reliability of Langenskiöld classification in BD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty seven patients with BD were included in this cross-sectional study. Two separate presentations including clinical findings and standard knee radiographs were evaluated by three different groups (residents, surgeons, and pediatric orthopedic surgeons) and were sent to the observers every other month by hiding patients’ personal information. Intraobserver and interobserver reliabilities in these three groups were examined. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) tests were used for this purpose. RESULTS: Intraobserver reliability (ICC) was similar (excellent) in three groups (0.822, 0.804, and 0.763). Interobserver reliability among three groups was meanly excellent. CONCLUSION: Agreement to Langenskiöld classifications found excellent for three groups. Surgical experience did not change intraobserver and interobserver reliability in Langenskiöld classification.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6699207
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66992072019-09-06 Langenskiöld Classification for Blount Disease: Is It Reliable? Erkus, Serkan Turgut, Ali Kalenderer, Onder Indian J Orthop Original Article BACKGROUNDS: Blount disease (BD) is a developmental disease which medial part of the proximal tibial physis resulting genu varum. Plain radiographs are necessary for diagnosis. For this purpose, Langenskiöld classification is used. There are not enough data about Langenskiöld classification's reliability in the English literature. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the intra- and inter-reliability of Langenskiöld classification in BD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty seven patients with BD were included in this cross-sectional study. Two separate presentations including clinical findings and standard knee radiographs were evaluated by three different groups (residents, surgeons, and pediatric orthopedic surgeons) and were sent to the observers every other month by hiding patients’ personal information. Intraobserver and interobserver reliabilities in these three groups were examined. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) tests were used for this purpose. RESULTS: Intraobserver reliability (ICC) was similar (excellent) in three groups (0.822, 0.804, and 0.763). Interobserver reliability among three groups was meanly excellent. CONCLUSION: Agreement to Langenskiöld classifications found excellent for three groups. Surgical experience did not change intraobserver and interobserver reliability in Langenskiöld classification. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6699207/ /pubmed/31488937 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_679_18 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Indian Journal of Orthopaedics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Erkus, Serkan
Turgut, Ali
Kalenderer, Onder
Langenskiöld Classification for Blount Disease: Is It Reliable?
title Langenskiöld Classification for Blount Disease: Is It Reliable?
title_full Langenskiöld Classification for Blount Disease: Is It Reliable?
title_fullStr Langenskiöld Classification for Blount Disease: Is It Reliable?
title_full_unstemmed Langenskiöld Classification for Blount Disease: Is It Reliable?
title_short Langenskiöld Classification for Blount Disease: Is It Reliable?
title_sort langenskiöld classification for blount disease: is it reliable?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6699207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31488937
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_679_18
work_keys_str_mv AT erkusserkan langenskioldclassificationforblountdiseaseisitreliable
AT turgutali langenskioldclassificationforblountdiseaseisitreliable
AT kalendereronder langenskioldclassificationforblountdiseaseisitreliable