Cargando…
Langenskiöld Classification for Blount Disease: Is It Reliable?
BACKGROUNDS: Blount disease (BD) is a developmental disease which medial part of the proximal tibial physis resulting genu varum. Plain radiographs are necessary for diagnosis. For this purpose, Langenskiöld classification is used. There are not enough data about Langenskiöld classification's r...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6699207/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31488937 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_679_18 |
_version_ | 1783444673458601984 |
---|---|
author | Erkus, Serkan Turgut, Ali Kalenderer, Onder |
author_facet | Erkus, Serkan Turgut, Ali Kalenderer, Onder |
author_sort | Erkus, Serkan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUNDS: Blount disease (BD) is a developmental disease which medial part of the proximal tibial physis resulting genu varum. Plain radiographs are necessary for diagnosis. For this purpose, Langenskiöld classification is used. There are not enough data about Langenskiöld classification's reliability in the English literature. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the intra- and inter-reliability of Langenskiöld classification in BD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty seven patients with BD were included in this cross-sectional study. Two separate presentations including clinical findings and standard knee radiographs were evaluated by three different groups (residents, surgeons, and pediatric orthopedic surgeons) and were sent to the observers every other month by hiding patients’ personal information. Intraobserver and interobserver reliabilities in these three groups were examined. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) tests were used for this purpose. RESULTS: Intraobserver reliability (ICC) was similar (excellent) in three groups (0.822, 0.804, and 0.763). Interobserver reliability among three groups was meanly excellent. CONCLUSION: Agreement to Langenskiöld classifications found excellent for three groups. Surgical experience did not change intraobserver and interobserver reliability in Langenskiöld classification. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6699207 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66992072019-09-06 Langenskiöld Classification for Blount Disease: Is It Reliable? Erkus, Serkan Turgut, Ali Kalenderer, Onder Indian J Orthop Original Article BACKGROUNDS: Blount disease (BD) is a developmental disease which medial part of the proximal tibial physis resulting genu varum. Plain radiographs are necessary for diagnosis. For this purpose, Langenskiöld classification is used. There are not enough data about Langenskiöld classification's reliability in the English literature. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the intra- and inter-reliability of Langenskiöld classification in BD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty seven patients with BD were included in this cross-sectional study. Two separate presentations including clinical findings and standard knee radiographs were evaluated by three different groups (residents, surgeons, and pediatric orthopedic surgeons) and were sent to the observers every other month by hiding patients’ personal information. Intraobserver and interobserver reliabilities in these three groups were examined. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) tests were used for this purpose. RESULTS: Intraobserver reliability (ICC) was similar (excellent) in three groups (0.822, 0.804, and 0.763). Interobserver reliability among three groups was meanly excellent. CONCLUSION: Agreement to Langenskiöld classifications found excellent for three groups. Surgical experience did not change intraobserver and interobserver reliability in Langenskiöld classification. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6699207/ /pubmed/31488937 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_679_18 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Indian Journal of Orthopaedics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Erkus, Serkan Turgut, Ali Kalenderer, Onder Langenskiöld Classification for Blount Disease: Is It Reliable? |
title | Langenskiöld Classification for Blount Disease: Is It Reliable? |
title_full | Langenskiöld Classification for Blount Disease: Is It Reliable? |
title_fullStr | Langenskiöld Classification for Blount Disease: Is It Reliable? |
title_full_unstemmed | Langenskiöld Classification for Blount Disease: Is It Reliable? |
title_short | Langenskiöld Classification for Blount Disease: Is It Reliable? |
title_sort | langenskiöld classification for blount disease: is it reliable? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6699207/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31488937 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_679_18 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT erkusserkan langenskioldclassificationforblountdiseaseisitreliable AT turgutali langenskioldclassificationforblountdiseaseisitreliable AT kalendereronder langenskioldclassificationforblountdiseaseisitreliable |