Cargando…

EVALUATION OF DISTAL FOREARM FRACTURES USING THE AO 2018 CLASSIFICATION

OBJECTIVE: Distal forearm fractures are among the most common upper limb fractures in all ages, and many classifications have been proposed to describe them. Recently, a new version of AO/OTA classification was proposed. The aim of this study is to use the AO/OTA 2018 classification to report the ep...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nogueira, Alysson Figueiredo, Moratelli, Lucas, Martins, Marcela dos Santos, Iupi, Ricardo Torres, de Abreu, Marcos Felipe Marcatto, Nakamoto, João Carlos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: ATHA EDITORA 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6699379/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31452624
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220192704218467
_version_ 1783444714008084480
author Nogueira, Alysson Figueiredo
Moratelli, Lucas
Martins, Marcela dos Santos
Iupi, Ricardo Torres
de Abreu, Marcos Felipe Marcatto
Nakamoto, João Carlos
author_facet Nogueira, Alysson Figueiredo
Moratelli, Lucas
Martins, Marcela dos Santos
Iupi, Ricardo Torres
de Abreu, Marcos Felipe Marcatto
Nakamoto, João Carlos
author_sort Nogueira, Alysson Figueiredo
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Distal forearm fractures are among the most common upper limb fractures in all ages, and many classifications have been proposed to describe them. Recently, a new version of AO/OTA classification was proposed. The aim of this study is to use the AO/OTA 2018 classification to report the epidemiology of distal forearm fractures in adults treated at a single center. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the initial radiographs obtained from cases of distal forearm fractures in an orthopedic emergency room at a single tertiary hospital. RESULTS: Three hundred twenty-two cases were studied, aged 50.35 ± 18.98 years, 55.3% were female and 44.7% were right-sided. Type 2R3A, 2R3B and 2R3C fractures corresponded to 32.3%, 18.0% and 48.4% of the cases, respectively. Distal ulnar fracture was present in 41.9%. There was a correlation between age and sex: 78.3% of the subjects aged under 30 years were male, and 80.6% of those aged over 60 years were female (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The most common type of radial fractures was 2R3C, and the most common type of ulna fracture was 2U3A1.1. There was a correlation between age and sex. Level of evidence IV, Case-series.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6699379
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher ATHA EDITORA
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66993792019-08-26 EVALUATION OF DISTAL FOREARM FRACTURES USING THE AO 2018 CLASSIFICATION Nogueira, Alysson Figueiredo Moratelli, Lucas Martins, Marcela dos Santos Iupi, Ricardo Torres de Abreu, Marcos Felipe Marcatto Nakamoto, João Carlos Acta Ortop Bras Original Articles OBJECTIVE: Distal forearm fractures are among the most common upper limb fractures in all ages, and many classifications have been proposed to describe them. Recently, a new version of AO/OTA classification was proposed. The aim of this study is to use the AO/OTA 2018 classification to report the epidemiology of distal forearm fractures in adults treated at a single center. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the initial radiographs obtained from cases of distal forearm fractures in an orthopedic emergency room at a single tertiary hospital. RESULTS: Three hundred twenty-two cases were studied, aged 50.35 ± 18.98 years, 55.3% were female and 44.7% were right-sided. Type 2R3A, 2R3B and 2R3C fractures corresponded to 32.3%, 18.0% and 48.4% of the cases, respectively. Distal ulnar fracture was present in 41.9%. There was a correlation between age and sex: 78.3% of the subjects aged under 30 years were male, and 80.6% of those aged over 60 years were female (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The most common type of radial fractures was 2R3C, and the most common type of ulna fracture was 2U3A1.1. There was a correlation between age and sex. Level of evidence IV, Case-series. ATHA EDITORA 2019-08-01 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6699379/ /pubmed/31452624 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220192704218467 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Nogueira, Alysson Figueiredo
Moratelli, Lucas
Martins, Marcela dos Santos
Iupi, Ricardo Torres
de Abreu, Marcos Felipe Marcatto
Nakamoto, João Carlos
EVALUATION OF DISTAL FOREARM FRACTURES USING THE AO 2018 CLASSIFICATION
title EVALUATION OF DISTAL FOREARM FRACTURES USING THE AO 2018 CLASSIFICATION
title_full EVALUATION OF DISTAL FOREARM FRACTURES USING THE AO 2018 CLASSIFICATION
title_fullStr EVALUATION OF DISTAL FOREARM FRACTURES USING THE AO 2018 CLASSIFICATION
title_full_unstemmed EVALUATION OF DISTAL FOREARM FRACTURES USING THE AO 2018 CLASSIFICATION
title_short EVALUATION OF DISTAL FOREARM FRACTURES USING THE AO 2018 CLASSIFICATION
title_sort evaluation of distal forearm fractures using the ao 2018 classification
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6699379/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31452624
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220192704218467
work_keys_str_mv AT nogueiraalyssonfigueiredo evaluationofdistalforearmfracturesusingtheao2018classification
AT moratellilucas evaluationofdistalforearmfracturesusingtheao2018classification
AT martinsmarceladossantos evaluationofdistalforearmfracturesusingtheao2018classification
AT iupiricardotorres evaluationofdistalforearmfracturesusingtheao2018classification
AT deabreumarcosfelipemarcatto evaluationofdistalforearmfracturesusingtheao2018classification
AT nakamotojoaocarlos evaluationofdistalforearmfracturesusingtheao2018classification