Cargando…
Corrective biology: psychosomatics in and as neuropsychoanalysis
This article analyses how and with what consequences body–mind relations (the sphere of the psychosomatic) are being modelled in the 21st century through considering the interdiscipline of neuropsychoanalysis. The promise of the term psychosomatic lies in its efforts to rework standard, bifurcated m...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6699604/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31217197 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2019-011645 |
_version_ | 1783444752080830464 |
---|---|
author | Callard, Felicity Papoulias, Constantina (Stan) |
author_facet | Callard, Felicity Papoulias, Constantina (Stan) |
author_sort | Callard, Felicity |
collection | PubMed |
description | This article analyses how and with what consequences body–mind relations (the sphere of the psychosomatic) are being modelled in the 21st century through considering the interdiscipline of neuropsychoanalysis. The promise of the term psychosomatic lies in its efforts to rework standard, bifurcated models of mind and body: somatic acts are simultaneously psychic acts. But neuropsychoanalysis, as it brings the neurosciences and psychoanalysis together to model an embodied ‘MindBrain’, ends up evacuating another potent characteristic found in much of the psychosomatic tradition—its refusal to adjudicate, a priori, what counts as the adaptive or well-regulated subject. The psychosomatic problem in psychoanalysis profoundly disturbs everyday models of functionality, adaptation and agency, by positing the psyche as an ‘other’ of the physiological within the physiological. By contrast, neuropsychoanalysis ends up parsing too easily the healthy from the pathological body, such that it is only the latter that is subject to forces that work against self-preservation and self-regulation. In so doing, neuropsychoanalysis recasts the radical problematic that the psychosomatic installed for psychoanalysis in the direction of a corrective biology. This corrective biology is given form in two ways: (1) through translating the Freudian drive—that unruly and foundational concept which addresses the difficult articulation of soma and psyche—into a series of Basic Emotion Systems modelled by the affective neuroscientist Jaak Panksepp and (2) through resituating and quarantining the troubling, non-adaptive aspects of the Freudian psyche within the domain of addiction. That easy separation between the healthy and the pathological is all too often found in current descriptions of healthcare and patient encounters. The article refuses it and calls for the revivification of other ways of thinking about how human subjects—psychosomatic organisms—find ways to live, and to die. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6699604 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-66996042019-08-29 Corrective biology: psychosomatics in and as neuropsychoanalysis Callard, Felicity Papoulias, Constantina (Stan) Med Humanit Original Research This article analyses how and with what consequences body–mind relations (the sphere of the psychosomatic) are being modelled in the 21st century through considering the interdiscipline of neuropsychoanalysis. The promise of the term psychosomatic lies in its efforts to rework standard, bifurcated models of mind and body: somatic acts are simultaneously psychic acts. But neuropsychoanalysis, as it brings the neurosciences and psychoanalysis together to model an embodied ‘MindBrain’, ends up evacuating another potent characteristic found in much of the psychosomatic tradition—its refusal to adjudicate, a priori, what counts as the adaptive or well-regulated subject. The psychosomatic problem in psychoanalysis profoundly disturbs everyday models of functionality, adaptation and agency, by positing the psyche as an ‘other’ of the physiological within the physiological. By contrast, neuropsychoanalysis ends up parsing too easily the healthy from the pathological body, such that it is only the latter that is subject to forces that work against self-preservation and self-regulation. In so doing, neuropsychoanalysis recasts the radical problematic that the psychosomatic installed for psychoanalysis in the direction of a corrective biology. This corrective biology is given form in two ways: (1) through translating the Freudian drive—that unruly and foundational concept which addresses the difficult articulation of soma and psyche—into a series of Basic Emotion Systems modelled by the affective neuroscientist Jaak Panksepp and (2) through resituating and quarantining the troubling, non-adaptive aspects of the Freudian psyche within the domain of addiction. That easy separation between the healthy and the pathological is all too often found in current descriptions of healthcare and patient encounters. The article refuses it and calls for the revivification of other ways of thinking about how human subjects—psychosomatic organisms—find ways to live, and to die. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-06 2019-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6699604/ /pubmed/31217197 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2019-011645 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Callard, Felicity Papoulias, Constantina (Stan) Corrective biology: psychosomatics in and as neuropsychoanalysis |
title | Corrective biology: psychosomatics in and as neuropsychoanalysis |
title_full | Corrective biology: psychosomatics in and as neuropsychoanalysis |
title_fullStr | Corrective biology: psychosomatics in and as neuropsychoanalysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Corrective biology: psychosomatics in and as neuropsychoanalysis |
title_short | Corrective biology: psychosomatics in and as neuropsychoanalysis |
title_sort | corrective biology: psychosomatics in and as neuropsychoanalysis |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6699604/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31217197 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2019-011645 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT callardfelicity correctivebiologypsychosomaticsinandasneuropsychoanalysis AT papouliasconstantinastan correctivebiologypsychosomaticsinandasneuropsychoanalysis |