Cargando…

Prognostic significance of age in 5631 patients with Wilms tumour prospectively registered in International Society of Paediatric Oncology (SIOP) 93-01 and 2001

BACKGROUND: To enhance risk stratification for Wilms tumour (WT) in a pre-operative chemotherapy setting, we explored the prognostic significance and optimal age cutoffs in patients treated according to International Society of Paediatric Oncology Renal Tumour Study Group (SIOP-RTSG) protocols. METH...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hol, J. A., Lopez-Yurda, M. I., Van Tinteren, H., Van Grotel, M., Godzinski, J., Vujanic, G., Oldenburger, F., De Camargo, B., Ramírez-Villar, G. L., Bergeron, C., Pritchard-Jones, K., Graf, N., Van den Heuvel-Eibrink, M. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6699693/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31425556
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221373
_version_ 1783444757592145920
author Hol, J. A.
Lopez-Yurda, M. I.
Van Tinteren, H.
Van Grotel, M.
Godzinski, J.
Vujanic, G.
Oldenburger, F.
De Camargo, B.
Ramírez-Villar, G. L.
Bergeron, C.
Pritchard-Jones, K.
Graf, N.
Van den Heuvel-Eibrink, M. M.
author_facet Hol, J. A.
Lopez-Yurda, M. I.
Van Tinteren, H.
Van Grotel, M.
Godzinski, J.
Vujanic, G.
Oldenburger, F.
De Camargo, B.
Ramírez-Villar, G. L.
Bergeron, C.
Pritchard-Jones, K.
Graf, N.
Van den Heuvel-Eibrink, M. M.
author_sort Hol, J. A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To enhance risk stratification for Wilms tumour (WT) in a pre-operative chemotherapy setting, we explored the prognostic significance and optimal age cutoffs in patients treated according to International Society of Paediatric Oncology Renal Tumour Study Group (SIOP-RTSG) protocols. METHODS: Patients(6 months-18 years) with unilateral WT were selected from prospective SIOP 93–01 and 2001 studies(1993–2016). Martingale residual analysis was used to explore optimal age cutoffs. Outcome according to age was analyzed by uni- and multivariable analysis, adjusted for sex, biopsy(yes/no), stage, histology and tumour volume at surgery. RESULTS: 5631 patients were included; median age was 3.4 years(IQR: 2–5.1). Estimated 5-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were 85%(95%CI 83.5–85.5) and 93%(95%CI 92.0–93.4). Martingale residual plots detected no optimal age cutoffs. Multivariable analysis showed lower EFS with increasing age(linear trend P<0.001). Using previously described age categories, EFS was lower for patients aged 2-4(HR 1.34, P = 0.02), 4-10(HR 1.83, P<0.0001) and 10–18 years(HR 1.74, P = 0.01) as compared to patients aged 6 months-2 years. OS was lower for patients 4–10 years(HR 1.67, P = 0.01) and 10–18 years(HR 1.87, P = 0.04), but not for 2–4 years(HR 1.29, P = 0.23). Higher stage, histological risk group and tumour volume were independent adverse prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: Although optimal age cutoffs could not be identified, we demonstrated the prognostic significance of age as well as previously described cutoffs for EFS (2 and 4 years) and OS (4 years) in children with WT treated with pre-operative chemotherapy. These findings encourage the consideration of age in the design of future SIOP-RTSG protocols.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6699693
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-66996932019-09-04 Prognostic significance of age in 5631 patients with Wilms tumour prospectively registered in International Society of Paediatric Oncology (SIOP) 93-01 and 2001 Hol, J. A. Lopez-Yurda, M. I. Van Tinteren, H. Van Grotel, M. Godzinski, J. Vujanic, G. Oldenburger, F. De Camargo, B. Ramírez-Villar, G. L. Bergeron, C. Pritchard-Jones, K. Graf, N. Van den Heuvel-Eibrink, M. M. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: To enhance risk stratification for Wilms tumour (WT) in a pre-operative chemotherapy setting, we explored the prognostic significance and optimal age cutoffs in patients treated according to International Society of Paediatric Oncology Renal Tumour Study Group (SIOP-RTSG) protocols. METHODS: Patients(6 months-18 years) with unilateral WT were selected from prospective SIOP 93–01 and 2001 studies(1993–2016). Martingale residual analysis was used to explore optimal age cutoffs. Outcome according to age was analyzed by uni- and multivariable analysis, adjusted for sex, biopsy(yes/no), stage, histology and tumour volume at surgery. RESULTS: 5631 patients were included; median age was 3.4 years(IQR: 2–5.1). Estimated 5-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were 85%(95%CI 83.5–85.5) and 93%(95%CI 92.0–93.4). Martingale residual plots detected no optimal age cutoffs. Multivariable analysis showed lower EFS with increasing age(linear trend P<0.001). Using previously described age categories, EFS was lower for patients aged 2-4(HR 1.34, P = 0.02), 4-10(HR 1.83, P<0.0001) and 10–18 years(HR 1.74, P = 0.01) as compared to patients aged 6 months-2 years. OS was lower for patients 4–10 years(HR 1.67, P = 0.01) and 10–18 years(HR 1.87, P = 0.04), but not for 2–4 years(HR 1.29, P = 0.23). Higher stage, histological risk group and tumour volume were independent adverse prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: Although optimal age cutoffs could not be identified, we demonstrated the prognostic significance of age as well as previously described cutoffs for EFS (2 and 4 years) and OS (4 years) in children with WT treated with pre-operative chemotherapy. These findings encourage the consideration of age in the design of future SIOP-RTSG protocols. Public Library of Science 2019-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6699693/ /pubmed/31425556 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221373 Text en © 2019 Hol et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hol, J. A.
Lopez-Yurda, M. I.
Van Tinteren, H.
Van Grotel, M.
Godzinski, J.
Vujanic, G.
Oldenburger, F.
De Camargo, B.
Ramírez-Villar, G. L.
Bergeron, C.
Pritchard-Jones, K.
Graf, N.
Van den Heuvel-Eibrink, M. M.
Prognostic significance of age in 5631 patients with Wilms tumour prospectively registered in International Society of Paediatric Oncology (SIOP) 93-01 and 2001
title Prognostic significance of age in 5631 patients with Wilms tumour prospectively registered in International Society of Paediatric Oncology (SIOP) 93-01 and 2001
title_full Prognostic significance of age in 5631 patients with Wilms tumour prospectively registered in International Society of Paediatric Oncology (SIOP) 93-01 and 2001
title_fullStr Prognostic significance of age in 5631 patients with Wilms tumour prospectively registered in International Society of Paediatric Oncology (SIOP) 93-01 and 2001
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic significance of age in 5631 patients with Wilms tumour prospectively registered in International Society of Paediatric Oncology (SIOP) 93-01 and 2001
title_short Prognostic significance of age in 5631 patients with Wilms tumour prospectively registered in International Society of Paediatric Oncology (SIOP) 93-01 and 2001
title_sort prognostic significance of age in 5631 patients with wilms tumour prospectively registered in international society of paediatric oncology (siop) 93-01 and 2001
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6699693/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31425556
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221373
work_keys_str_mv AT holja prognosticsignificanceofagein5631patientswithwilmstumourprospectivelyregisteredininternationalsocietyofpaediatriconcologysiop9301and2001
AT lopezyurdami prognosticsignificanceofagein5631patientswithwilmstumourprospectivelyregisteredininternationalsocietyofpaediatriconcologysiop9301and2001
AT vantinterenh prognosticsignificanceofagein5631patientswithwilmstumourprospectivelyregisteredininternationalsocietyofpaediatriconcologysiop9301and2001
AT vangrotelm prognosticsignificanceofagein5631patientswithwilmstumourprospectivelyregisteredininternationalsocietyofpaediatriconcologysiop9301and2001
AT godzinskij prognosticsignificanceofagein5631patientswithwilmstumourprospectivelyregisteredininternationalsocietyofpaediatriconcologysiop9301and2001
AT vujanicg prognosticsignificanceofagein5631patientswithwilmstumourprospectivelyregisteredininternationalsocietyofpaediatriconcologysiop9301and2001
AT oldenburgerf prognosticsignificanceofagein5631patientswithwilmstumourprospectivelyregisteredininternationalsocietyofpaediatriconcologysiop9301and2001
AT decamargob prognosticsignificanceofagein5631patientswithwilmstumourprospectivelyregisteredininternationalsocietyofpaediatriconcologysiop9301and2001
AT ramirezvillargl prognosticsignificanceofagein5631patientswithwilmstumourprospectivelyregisteredininternationalsocietyofpaediatriconcologysiop9301and2001
AT bergeronc prognosticsignificanceofagein5631patientswithwilmstumourprospectivelyregisteredininternationalsocietyofpaediatriconcologysiop9301and2001
AT pritchardjonesk prognosticsignificanceofagein5631patientswithwilmstumourprospectivelyregisteredininternationalsocietyofpaediatriconcologysiop9301and2001
AT grafn prognosticsignificanceofagein5631patientswithwilmstumourprospectivelyregisteredininternationalsocietyofpaediatriconcologysiop9301and2001
AT vandenheuveleibrinkmm prognosticsignificanceofagein5631patientswithwilmstumourprospectivelyregisteredininternationalsocietyofpaediatriconcologysiop9301and2001