Cargando…
The Effects of Restriction Pressures on the Acute Responses to Blood Flow Restriction Exercise
PURPOSE: No current guidelines or recommendations exist informing the selection of restriction pressure during blood flow restriction exercise (BFRE). Moreover, the effects of specific relative restriction pressures on the acute muscle, metabolic and cardiopulmonary responses to BFRE are unclear. Th...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6700307/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31456694 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.01018 |
_version_ | 1783444845384171520 |
---|---|
author | Ilett, Michael J. Rantalainen, Timo Keske, Michelle A. May, Anthony K. Warmington, Stuart A. |
author_facet | Ilett, Michael J. Rantalainen, Timo Keske, Michelle A. May, Anthony K. Warmington, Stuart A. |
author_sort | Ilett, Michael J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: No current guidelines or recommendations exist informing the selection of restriction pressure during blood flow restriction exercise (BFRE). Moreover, the effects of specific relative restriction pressures on the acute muscle, metabolic and cardiopulmonary responses to BFRE are unclear. The purpose of this study was to characterize these acute responses at different levels of restriction pressure. METHODS: Participants (n = 10) completed rhythmic isometric knee extension exercise across five experimental trials in a balanced randomized order. Three were BFRE trials {B-40 [restriction pressure set to 40% LOP (total limb occlusion pressure)]; B-60 (60% LOP); and B-80 (80% LOP)} with a workload equivalent to 20% maximal voluntary force (MVC), one was non-BFRE at 20% MVC (LL) and one was non-BFRE at 80% MVC (HL). Measurements recorded were torque, muscle activity via electromyography (EMG), tissue oxygenation via near infrared spectroscopy, whole body oxygen consumption, blood lactate and heart rate. RESULTS: For the LL and B-40 trials, most measures remained constant. However, for the B-60 and B-80 trials, significant fatigue was demonstrated by a reduction in MVC torque across the trial (p < 0.05). Blood lactate increased from baseline in HL, B-60, and B-80 (p < 0.05). Submaximal EMG was greater in B-60 and B-80 than LL, but lower compared with HL (p < 0.05). Tissue oxygenation decreased in HL, B-40, B-60, and B-80 (p < 0.05), which was lower in the B-80 trial compared to all other trials (p < 0.01). Whole body oxygen consumption was not different between the BFRE trials (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: We demonstrate graded/progressive acute responses with increasing applied pressure during BFRE, from which we speculate that an effective minimum “threshold” around 60% LOP may be necessary for BFRE to be effective with training. While these data provide some insight on the possible mechanisms by which BFRE develops skeletal muscle size and strength when undertaken chronically across a training program, the outcomes of chronic training programs using different levels of applied restriction pressures remain to be tested. Overall, the present study recommends 60–80% LOP as a suitable “minimum” BFRE pressure. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6700307 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67003072019-08-27 The Effects of Restriction Pressures on the Acute Responses to Blood Flow Restriction Exercise Ilett, Michael J. Rantalainen, Timo Keske, Michelle A. May, Anthony K. Warmington, Stuart A. Front Physiol Physiology PURPOSE: No current guidelines or recommendations exist informing the selection of restriction pressure during blood flow restriction exercise (BFRE). Moreover, the effects of specific relative restriction pressures on the acute muscle, metabolic and cardiopulmonary responses to BFRE are unclear. The purpose of this study was to characterize these acute responses at different levels of restriction pressure. METHODS: Participants (n = 10) completed rhythmic isometric knee extension exercise across five experimental trials in a balanced randomized order. Three were BFRE trials {B-40 [restriction pressure set to 40% LOP (total limb occlusion pressure)]; B-60 (60% LOP); and B-80 (80% LOP)} with a workload equivalent to 20% maximal voluntary force (MVC), one was non-BFRE at 20% MVC (LL) and one was non-BFRE at 80% MVC (HL). Measurements recorded were torque, muscle activity via electromyography (EMG), tissue oxygenation via near infrared spectroscopy, whole body oxygen consumption, blood lactate and heart rate. RESULTS: For the LL and B-40 trials, most measures remained constant. However, for the B-60 and B-80 trials, significant fatigue was demonstrated by a reduction in MVC torque across the trial (p < 0.05). Blood lactate increased from baseline in HL, B-60, and B-80 (p < 0.05). Submaximal EMG was greater in B-60 and B-80 than LL, but lower compared with HL (p < 0.05). Tissue oxygenation decreased in HL, B-40, B-60, and B-80 (p < 0.05), which was lower in the B-80 trial compared to all other trials (p < 0.01). Whole body oxygen consumption was not different between the BFRE trials (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: We demonstrate graded/progressive acute responses with increasing applied pressure during BFRE, from which we speculate that an effective minimum “threshold” around 60% LOP may be necessary for BFRE to be effective with training. While these data provide some insight on the possible mechanisms by which BFRE develops skeletal muscle size and strength when undertaken chronically across a training program, the outcomes of chronic training programs using different levels of applied restriction pressures remain to be tested. Overall, the present study recommends 60–80% LOP as a suitable “minimum” BFRE pressure. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6700307/ /pubmed/31456694 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.01018 Text en Copyright © 2019 Ilett, Rantalainen, Keske, May and Warmington. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Physiology Ilett, Michael J. Rantalainen, Timo Keske, Michelle A. May, Anthony K. Warmington, Stuart A. The Effects of Restriction Pressures on the Acute Responses to Blood Flow Restriction Exercise |
title | The Effects of Restriction Pressures on the Acute Responses to Blood Flow Restriction Exercise |
title_full | The Effects of Restriction Pressures on the Acute Responses to Blood Flow Restriction Exercise |
title_fullStr | The Effects of Restriction Pressures on the Acute Responses to Blood Flow Restriction Exercise |
title_full_unstemmed | The Effects of Restriction Pressures on the Acute Responses to Blood Flow Restriction Exercise |
title_short | The Effects of Restriction Pressures on the Acute Responses to Blood Flow Restriction Exercise |
title_sort | effects of restriction pressures on the acute responses to blood flow restriction exercise |
topic | Physiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6700307/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31456694 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.01018 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ilettmichaelj theeffectsofrestrictionpressuresontheacuteresponsestobloodflowrestrictionexercise AT rantalainentimo theeffectsofrestrictionpressuresontheacuteresponsestobloodflowrestrictionexercise AT keskemichellea theeffectsofrestrictionpressuresontheacuteresponsestobloodflowrestrictionexercise AT mayanthonyk theeffectsofrestrictionpressuresontheacuteresponsestobloodflowrestrictionexercise AT warmingtonstuarta theeffectsofrestrictionpressuresontheacuteresponsestobloodflowrestrictionexercise AT ilettmichaelj effectsofrestrictionpressuresontheacuteresponsestobloodflowrestrictionexercise AT rantalainentimo effectsofrestrictionpressuresontheacuteresponsestobloodflowrestrictionexercise AT keskemichellea effectsofrestrictionpressuresontheacuteresponsestobloodflowrestrictionexercise AT mayanthonyk effectsofrestrictionpressuresontheacuteresponsestobloodflowrestrictionexercise AT warmingtonstuarta effectsofrestrictionpressuresontheacuteresponsestobloodflowrestrictionexercise |