Cargando…

The Effects of Restriction Pressures on the Acute Responses to Blood Flow Restriction Exercise

PURPOSE: No current guidelines or recommendations exist informing the selection of restriction pressure during blood flow restriction exercise (BFRE). Moreover, the effects of specific relative restriction pressures on the acute muscle, metabolic and cardiopulmonary responses to BFRE are unclear. Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ilett, Michael J., Rantalainen, Timo, Keske, Michelle A., May, Anthony K., Warmington, Stuart A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6700307/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31456694
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.01018
_version_ 1783444845384171520
author Ilett, Michael J.
Rantalainen, Timo
Keske, Michelle A.
May, Anthony K.
Warmington, Stuart A.
author_facet Ilett, Michael J.
Rantalainen, Timo
Keske, Michelle A.
May, Anthony K.
Warmington, Stuart A.
author_sort Ilett, Michael J.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: No current guidelines or recommendations exist informing the selection of restriction pressure during blood flow restriction exercise (BFRE). Moreover, the effects of specific relative restriction pressures on the acute muscle, metabolic and cardiopulmonary responses to BFRE are unclear. The purpose of this study was to characterize these acute responses at different levels of restriction pressure. METHODS: Participants (n = 10) completed rhythmic isometric knee extension exercise across five experimental trials in a balanced randomized order. Three were BFRE trials {B-40 [restriction pressure set to 40% LOP (total limb occlusion pressure)]; B-60 (60% LOP); and B-80 (80% LOP)} with a workload equivalent to 20% maximal voluntary force (MVC), one was non-BFRE at 20% MVC (LL) and one was non-BFRE at 80% MVC (HL). Measurements recorded were torque, muscle activity via electromyography (EMG), tissue oxygenation via near infrared spectroscopy, whole body oxygen consumption, blood lactate and heart rate. RESULTS: For the LL and B-40 trials, most measures remained constant. However, for the B-60 and B-80 trials, significant fatigue was demonstrated by a reduction in MVC torque across the trial (p < 0.05). Blood lactate increased from baseline in HL, B-60, and B-80 (p < 0.05). Submaximal EMG was greater in B-60 and B-80 than LL, but lower compared with HL (p < 0.05). Tissue oxygenation decreased in HL, B-40, B-60, and B-80 (p < 0.05), which was lower in the B-80 trial compared to all other trials (p < 0.01). Whole body oxygen consumption was not different between the BFRE trials (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: We demonstrate graded/progressive acute responses with increasing applied pressure during BFRE, from which we speculate that an effective minimum “threshold” around 60% LOP may be necessary for BFRE to be effective with training. While these data provide some insight on the possible mechanisms by which BFRE develops skeletal muscle size and strength when undertaken chronically across a training program, the outcomes of chronic training programs using different levels of applied restriction pressures remain to be tested. Overall, the present study recommends 60–80% LOP as a suitable “minimum” BFRE pressure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6700307
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67003072019-08-27 The Effects of Restriction Pressures on the Acute Responses to Blood Flow Restriction Exercise Ilett, Michael J. Rantalainen, Timo Keske, Michelle A. May, Anthony K. Warmington, Stuart A. Front Physiol Physiology PURPOSE: No current guidelines or recommendations exist informing the selection of restriction pressure during blood flow restriction exercise (BFRE). Moreover, the effects of specific relative restriction pressures on the acute muscle, metabolic and cardiopulmonary responses to BFRE are unclear. The purpose of this study was to characterize these acute responses at different levels of restriction pressure. METHODS: Participants (n = 10) completed rhythmic isometric knee extension exercise across five experimental trials in a balanced randomized order. Three were BFRE trials {B-40 [restriction pressure set to 40% LOP (total limb occlusion pressure)]; B-60 (60% LOP); and B-80 (80% LOP)} with a workload equivalent to 20% maximal voluntary force (MVC), one was non-BFRE at 20% MVC (LL) and one was non-BFRE at 80% MVC (HL). Measurements recorded were torque, muscle activity via electromyography (EMG), tissue oxygenation via near infrared spectroscopy, whole body oxygen consumption, blood lactate and heart rate. RESULTS: For the LL and B-40 trials, most measures remained constant. However, for the B-60 and B-80 trials, significant fatigue was demonstrated by a reduction in MVC torque across the trial (p < 0.05). Blood lactate increased from baseline in HL, B-60, and B-80 (p < 0.05). Submaximal EMG was greater in B-60 and B-80 than LL, but lower compared with HL (p < 0.05). Tissue oxygenation decreased in HL, B-40, B-60, and B-80 (p < 0.05), which was lower in the B-80 trial compared to all other trials (p < 0.01). Whole body oxygen consumption was not different between the BFRE trials (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: We demonstrate graded/progressive acute responses with increasing applied pressure during BFRE, from which we speculate that an effective minimum “threshold” around 60% LOP may be necessary for BFRE to be effective with training. While these data provide some insight on the possible mechanisms by which BFRE develops skeletal muscle size and strength when undertaken chronically across a training program, the outcomes of chronic training programs using different levels of applied restriction pressures remain to be tested. Overall, the present study recommends 60–80% LOP as a suitable “minimum” BFRE pressure. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6700307/ /pubmed/31456694 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.01018 Text en Copyright © 2019 Ilett, Rantalainen, Keske, May and Warmington. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Ilett, Michael J.
Rantalainen, Timo
Keske, Michelle A.
May, Anthony K.
Warmington, Stuart A.
The Effects of Restriction Pressures on the Acute Responses to Blood Flow Restriction Exercise
title The Effects of Restriction Pressures on the Acute Responses to Blood Flow Restriction Exercise
title_full The Effects of Restriction Pressures on the Acute Responses to Blood Flow Restriction Exercise
title_fullStr The Effects of Restriction Pressures on the Acute Responses to Blood Flow Restriction Exercise
title_full_unstemmed The Effects of Restriction Pressures on the Acute Responses to Blood Flow Restriction Exercise
title_short The Effects of Restriction Pressures on the Acute Responses to Blood Flow Restriction Exercise
title_sort effects of restriction pressures on the acute responses to blood flow restriction exercise
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6700307/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31456694
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.01018
work_keys_str_mv AT ilettmichaelj theeffectsofrestrictionpressuresontheacuteresponsestobloodflowrestrictionexercise
AT rantalainentimo theeffectsofrestrictionpressuresontheacuteresponsestobloodflowrestrictionexercise
AT keskemichellea theeffectsofrestrictionpressuresontheacuteresponsestobloodflowrestrictionexercise
AT mayanthonyk theeffectsofrestrictionpressuresontheacuteresponsestobloodflowrestrictionexercise
AT warmingtonstuarta theeffectsofrestrictionpressuresontheacuteresponsestobloodflowrestrictionexercise
AT ilettmichaelj effectsofrestrictionpressuresontheacuteresponsestobloodflowrestrictionexercise
AT rantalainentimo effectsofrestrictionpressuresontheacuteresponsestobloodflowrestrictionexercise
AT keskemichellea effectsofrestrictionpressuresontheacuteresponsestobloodflowrestrictionexercise
AT mayanthonyk effectsofrestrictionpressuresontheacuteresponsestobloodflowrestrictionexercise
AT warmingtonstuarta effectsofrestrictionpressuresontheacuteresponsestobloodflowrestrictionexercise