Cargando…
Muscle energy technique for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is an increasingly prevalent respiratory disease that impacts on daily living. In addition to difficulty breathing, many people experience extrapulmonary comorbidities such as musculoskeletal disorders. Pulmonary rehabilitation can improve fit...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6700764/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31452871 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-019-0256-9 |
_version_ | 1783444925374791680 |
---|---|
author | Baxter, Danielle A. Shergis, Johannah L. Fazalbhoy, Azharuddin Coyle, Meaghan E. |
author_facet | Baxter, Danielle A. Shergis, Johannah L. Fazalbhoy, Azharuddin Coyle, Meaghan E. |
author_sort | Baxter, Danielle A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is an increasingly prevalent respiratory disease that impacts on daily living. In addition to difficulty breathing, many people experience extrapulmonary comorbidities such as musculoskeletal disorders. Pulmonary rehabilitation can improve fitness and strength but may be difficult for patients with musculoskeletal disorders. Recent research indicates promising benefits of adding manual therapy to standard care to improve clinical outcomes. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Muscle Energy Technique (MET) for people with COPD. METHODS: Ten databases were searched from inceptions to May 2018. Eligible studies were randomised controlled trials assessing MET compared to any control for COPD. Outcomes included lung function, exercise capacity, health-related quality of life, and adverse events. RESULTS: Three randomised controlled trials assessing 90 participants were included. The quality of the research was limited by reporting of outcome measures and results, varying treatment protocols, and small sample sizes. Results from one study showed that pulmonary function was not statistically different between groups at end of treatment (FEV(1)% MD 4.87%; 95% CI − 0.79 to 10.53). Exercise capacity and perceived dyspnoea ratings were improved in single studies. Adverse events were unrelated to the MET intervention. CONCLUSIONS: The use of MET for COPD is an emerging field of research, with few studies evaluating its efficacy and safety. Currently, there is insufficient evidence to support the use of MET in the management of COPD. Rigorously designed studies with larger sample sizes are needed to better understand the role of MET for COPD. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12998-019-0256-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6700764 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67007642019-08-26 Muscle energy technique for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review Baxter, Danielle A. Shergis, Johannah L. Fazalbhoy, Azharuddin Coyle, Meaghan E. Chiropr Man Therap Systematic Review BACKGROUND: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is an increasingly prevalent respiratory disease that impacts on daily living. In addition to difficulty breathing, many people experience extrapulmonary comorbidities such as musculoskeletal disorders. Pulmonary rehabilitation can improve fitness and strength but may be difficult for patients with musculoskeletal disorders. Recent research indicates promising benefits of adding manual therapy to standard care to improve clinical outcomes. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Muscle Energy Technique (MET) for people with COPD. METHODS: Ten databases were searched from inceptions to May 2018. Eligible studies were randomised controlled trials assessing MET compared to any control for COPD. Outcomes included lung function, exercise capacity, health-related quality of life, and adverse events. RESULTS: Three randomised controlled trials assessing 90 participants were included. The quality of the research was limited by reporting of outcome measures and results, varying treatment protocols, and small sample sizes. Results from one study showed that pulmonary function was not statistically different between groups at end of treatment (FEV(1)% MD 4.87%; 95% CI − 0.79 to 10.53). Exercise capacity and perceived dyspnoea ratings were improved in single studies. Adverse events were unrelated to the MET intervention. CONCLUSIONS: The use of MET for COPD is an emerging field of research, with few studies evaluating its efficacy and safety. Currently, there is insufficient evidence to support the use of MET in the management of COPD. Rigorously designed studies with larger sample sizes are needed to better understand the role of MET for COPD. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12998-019-0256-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6700764/ /pubmed/31452871 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-019-0256-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Baxter, Danielle A. Shergis, Johannah L. Fazalbhoy, Azharuddin Coyle, Meaghan E. Muscle energy technique for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review |
title | Muscle energy technique for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review |
title_full | Muscle energy technique for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Muscle energy technique for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Muscle energy technique for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review |
title_short | Muscle energy technique for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review |
title_sort | muscle energy technique for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6700764/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31452871 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-019-0256-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT baxterdaniellea muscleenergytechniqueforchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseasystematicreview AT shergisjohannahl muscleenergytechniqueforchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseasystematicreview AT fazalbhoyazharuddin muscleenergytechniqueforchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseasystematicreview AT coylemeaghane muscleenergytechniqueforchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseasystematicreview |