Cargando…
Was it worth it? Older adults’ experiences of participating in a population-based cohort study – a focus group study
BACKGROUND: At present, we know relatively little about priorities and problems with topics that older adults experience when completing different examinations in longitudinal population-based studies. To examine these topics, research must be adapted to investigate the meanings, motivations, and in...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6700766/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31426756 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1238-4 |
_version_ | 1783444925843505152 |
---|---|
author | Dahlin-Ivanoff, Synneve Sterner, Therese Rydberg Blennow, Kaj Skoog, Ingmar Erhag, Hanna Falk |
author_facet | Dahlin-Ivanoff, Synneve Sterner, Therese Rydberg Blennow, Kaj Skoog, Ingmar Erhag, Hanna Falk |
author_sort | Dahlin-Ivanoff, Synneve |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: At present, we know relatively little about priorities and problems with topics that older adults experience when completing different examinations in longitudinal population-based studies. To examine these topics, research must be adapted to investigate the meanings, motivations, and interpretations of the individual participants themselves. Therefore, the present study aimed to explore older adults’ motives, understandings and experiences regarding participating in the Gothenburg H70 Birth Cohort Studies (the H-70 study). METHODS: Focus group discussions were used. A total of thirty-eight persons, 19 women and 19 men participated in nine focus groups. A strategic sampling technique was used to ensure that the focus group participants represented the larger population. RESULTS: The results supported the overall theme: “It was well worth the effort,” which summarized how the participants felt about the population health study. The following specific themes were also identified: an intense event, for the benefit of oneself and others, confidence in health research and the researcher, key decisions about test outcomes and the survey raising questions and providing few answers. CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of priorities and problems with topics experienced by older adults completing different examinations when participating in longitudinal population-based studies is crucial for research to improve the health and wellbeing of older people. To date, older people’s involvement in population-based cohort studies has largely been as research subjects. This study is a first step toward the participants taking a more active part by allowing them to share their experiences which can be used to improve the research procedures. This requires the participation of older adults in collaboration with the researchers, to ensure the quality of longitudinal studies of older adults. Therefore, our intention when it comes to future research will be to involve older adults—the target group—in the research procedure. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6700766 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67007662019-08-26 Was it worth it? Older adults’ experiences of participating in a population-based cohort study – a focus group study Dahlin-Ivanoff, Synneve Sterner, Therese Rydberg Blennow, Kaj Skoog, Ingmar Erhag, Hanna Falk BMC Geriatr Research Article BACKGROUND: At present, we know relatively little about priorities and problems with topics that older adults experience when completing different examinations in longitudinal population-based studies. To examine these topics, research must be adapted to investigate the meanings, motivations, and interpretations of the individual participants themselves. Therefore, the present study aimed to explore older adults’ motives, understandings and experiences regarding participating in the Gothenburg H70 Birth Cohort Studies (the H-70 study). METHODS: Focus group discussions were used. A total of thirty-eight persons, 19 women and 19 men participated in nine focus groups. A strategic sampling technique was used to ensure that the focus group participants represented the larger population. RESULTS: The results supported the overall theme: “It was well worth the effort,” which summarized how the participants felt about the population health study. The following specific themes were also identified: an intense event, for the benefit of oneself and others, confidence in health research and the researcher, key decisions about test outcomes and the survey raising questions and providing few answers. CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of priorities and problems with topics experienced by older adults completing different examinations when participating in longitudinal population-based studies is crucial for research to improve the health and wellbeing of older people. To date, older people’s involvement in population-based cohort studies has largely been as research subjects. This study is a first step toward the participants taking a more active part by allowing them to share their experiences which can be used to improve the research procedures. This requires the participation of older adults in collaboration with the researchers, to ensure the quality of longitudinal studies of older adults. Therefore, our intention when it comes to future research will be to involve older adults—the target group—in the research procedure. BioMed Central 2019-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6700766/ /pubmed/31426756 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1238-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Dahlin-Ivanoff, Synneve Sterner, Therese Rydberg Blennow, Kaj Skoog, Ingmar Erhag, Hanna Falk Was it worth it? Older adults’ experiences of participating in a population-based cohort study – a focus group study |
title | Was it worth it? Older adults’ experiences of participating in a population-based cohort study – a focus group study |
title_full | Was it worth it? Older adults’ experiences of participating in a population-based cohort study – a focus group study |
title_fullStr | Was it worth it? Older adults’ experiences of participating in a population-based cohort study – a focus group study |
title_full_unstemmed | Was it worth it? Older adults’ experiences of participating in a population-based cohort study – a focus group study |
title_short | Was it worth it? Older adults’ experiences of participating in a population-based cohort study – a focus group study |
title_sort | was it worth it? older adults’ experiences of participating in a population-based cohort study – a focus group study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6700766/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31426756 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1238-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dahlinivanoffsynneve wasitworthitolderadultsexperiencesofparticipatinginapopulationbasedcohortstudyafocusgroupstudy AT sternerthereserydberg wasitworthitolderadultsexperiencesofparticipatinginapopulationbasedcohortstudyafocusgroupstudy AT blennowkaj wasitworthitolderadultsexperiencesofparticipatinginapopulationbasedcohortstudyafocusgroupstudy AT skoogingmar wasitworthitolderadultsexperiencesofparticipatinginapopulationbasedcohortstudyafocusgroupstudy AT erhaghannafalk wasitworthitolderadultsexperiencesofparticipatinginapopulationbasedcohortstudyafocusgroupstudy |