Cargando…

Was it worth it? Older adults’ experiences of participating in a population-based cohort study – a focus group study

BACKGROUND: At present, we know relatively little about priorities and problems with topics that older adults experience when completing different examinations in longitudinal population-based studies. To examine these topics, research must be adapted to investigate the meanings, motivations, and in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dahlin-Ivanoff, Synneve, Sterner, Therese Rydberg, Blennow, Kaj, Skoog, Ingmar, Erhag, Hanna Falk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6700766/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31426756
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1238-4
_version_ 1783444925843505152
author Dahlin-Ivanoff, Synneve
Sterner, Therese Rydberg
Blennow, Kaj
Skoog, Ingmar
Erhag, Hanna Falk
author_facet Dahlin-Ivanoff, Synneve
Sterner, Therese Rydberg
Blennow, Kaj
Skoog, Ingmar
Erhag, Hanna Falk
author_sort Dahlin-Ivanoff, Synneve
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: At present, we know relatively little about priorities and problems with topics that older adults experience when completing different examinations in longitudinal population-based studies. To examine these topics, research must be adapted to investigate the meanings, motivations, and interpretations of the individual participants themselves. Therefore, the present study aimed to explore older adults’ motives, understandings and experiences regarding participating in the Gothenburg H70 Birth Cohort Studies (the H-70 study). METHODS: Focus group discussions were used. A total of thirty-eight persons, 19 women and 19 men participated in nine focus groups. A strategic sampling technique was used to ensure that the focus group participants represented the larger population. RESULTS: The results supported the overall theme: “It was well worth the effort,” which summarized how the participants felt about the population health study. The following specific themes were also identified: an intense event, for the benefit of oneself and others, confidence in health research and the researcher, key decisions about test outcomes and the survey raising questions and providing few answers. CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of priorities and problems with topics experienced by older adults completing different examinations when participating in longitudinal population-based studies is crucial for research to improve the health and wellbeing of older people. To date, older people’s involvement in population-based cohort studies has largely been as research subjects. This study is a first step toward the participants taking a more active part by allowing them to share their experiences which can be used to improve the research procedures. This requires the participation of older adults in collaboration with the researchers, to ensure the quality of longitudinal studies of older adults. Therefore, our intention when it comes to future research will be to involve older adults—the target group—in the research procedure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6700766
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67007662019-08-26 Was it worth it? Older adults’ experiences of participating in a population-based cohort study – a focus group study Dahlin-Ivanoff, Synneve Sterner, Therese Rydberg Blennow, Kaj Skoog, Ingmar Erhag, Hanna Falk BMC Geriatr Research Article BACKGROUND: At present, we know relatively little about priorities and problems with topics that older adults experience when completing different examinations in longitudinal population-based studies. To examine these topics, research must be adapted to investigate the meanings, motivations, and interpretations of the individual participants themselves. Therefore, the present study aimed to explore older adults’ motives, understandings and experiences regarding participating in the Gothenburg H70 Birth Cohort Studies (the H-70 study). METHODS: Focus group discussions were used. A total of thirty-eight persons, 19 women and 19 men participated in nine focus groups. A strategic sampling technique was used to ensure that the focus group participants represented the larger population. RESULTS: The results supported the overall theme: “It was well worth the effort,” which summarized how the participants felt about the population health study. The following specific themes were also identified: an intense event, for the benefit of oneself and others, confidence in health research and the researcher, key decisions about test outcomes and the survey raising questions and providing few answers. CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of priorities and problems with topics experienced by older adults completing different examinations when participating in longitudinal population-based studies is crucial for research to improve the health and wellbeing of older people. To date, older people’s involvement in population-based cohort studies has largely been as research subjects. This study is a first step toward the participants taking a more active part by allowing them to share their experiences which can be used to improve the research procedures. This requires the participation of older adults in collaboration with the researchers, to ensure the quality of longitudinal studies of older adults. Therefore, our intention when it comes to future research will be to involve older adults—the target group—in the research procedure. BioMed Central 2019-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6700766/ /pubmed/31426756 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1238-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dahlin-Ivanoff, Synneve
Sterner, Therese Rydberg
Blennow, Kaj
Skoog, Ingmar
Erhag, Hanna Falk
Was it worth it? Older adults’ experiences of participating in a population-based cohort study – a focus group study
title Was it worth it? Older adults’ experiences of participating in a population-based cohort study – a focus group study
title_full Was it worth it? Older adults’ experiences of participating in a population-based cohort study – a focus group study
title_fullStr Was it worth it? Older adults’ experiences of participating in a population-based cohort study – a focus group study
title_full_unstemmed Was it worth it? Older adults’ experiences of participating in a population-based cohort study – a focus group study
title_short Was it worth it? Older adults’ experiences of participating in a population-based cohort study – a focus group study
title_sort was it worth it? older adults’ experiences of participating in a population-based cohort study – a focus group study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6700766/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31426756
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1238-4
work_keys_str_mv AT dahlinivanoffsynneve wasitworthitolderadultsexperiencesofparticipatinginapopulationbasedcohortstudyafocusgroupstudy
AT sternerthereserydberg wasitworthitolderadultsexperiencesofparticipatinginapopulationbasedcohortstudyafocusgroupstudy
AT blennowkaj wasitworthitolderadultsexperiencesofparticipatinginapopulationbasedcohortstudyafocusgroupstudy
AT skoogingmar wasitworthitolderadultsexperiencesofparticipatinginapopulationbasedcohortstudyafocusgroupstudy
AT erhaghannafalk wasitworthitolderadultsexperiencesofparticipatinginapopulationbasedcohortstudyafocusgroupstudy