Cargando…

Quantitative margin assessment of radiofrequency ablation of a solitary colorectal hepatic metastasis using MIRADA RTx on CT scans: a feasibility study

BACKGROUND: Compared to surgery, radiofrequency ablation(RFA) for colorectal liver metastasis(CRLM) is associated with higher local recurrence(LR) rates. A wide margin (at least 5 mm) is generally recommended to prevent LR, but the optimal method to assess ablation margins is yet to be established....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sibinga Mulder, B. G., Hendriks, P., Baetens, T. R., van Erkel, A. R., van Rijswijk, C. S. P., van der Meer, R. W., van de Velde, C. J. H., Vahrmeijer, A. L., Mieog, J. S. D., Burgmans, M. C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6700773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31429708
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-019-0360-2
_version_ 1783444927532761088
author Sibinga Mulder, B. G.
Hendriks, P.
Baetens, T. R.
van Erkel, A. R.
van Rijswijk, C. S. P.
van der Meer, R. W.
van de Velde, C. J. H.
Vahrmeijer, A. L.
Mieog, J. S. D.
Burgmans, M. C.
author_facet Sibinga Mulder, B. G.
Hendriks, P.
Baetens, T. R.
van Erkel, A. R.
van Rijswijk, C. S. P.
van der Meer, R. W.
van de Velde, C. J. H.
Vahrmeijer, A. L.
Mieog, J. S. D.
Burgmans, M. C.
author_sort Sibinga Mulder, B. G.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Compared to surgery, radiofrequency ablation(RFA) for colorectal liver metastasis(CRLM) is associated with higher local recurrence(LR) rates. A wide margin (at least 5 mm) is generally recommended to prevent LR, but the optimal method to assess ablation margins is yet to be established. The aim of our study was to evaluate the feasibility and reproducibility of CT-CT co-registration, using MIRADA software, in order to assess ablation margins of patients with CRLM. METHODS: In this retrospective study, pre- and post-ablation contrast-enhanced CT scans of 29 patients, treated with percutaneous RFA for a solitary CRLM, were co-registered. Co-registration was performed by two independent radiologist, based on venous structures in proximity to the tumor. Feasibility of CT-CT co-registration and inter-observer agreement for reproducibility and ablation margins was determined. Furthermore, the minimal ablation margin was compared with the occurrence of LR during follow-up. RESULTS: Co-registration was considered feasible in 18 patients (61% male, 63.1(±10.9) year), with a perfect inter-observer agreement for completeness of ablation: κ = 1.0(p < 0.001). And substantial inter-observer agreement for measurement of the minimal margin (≤ 0 mm, 1-5 mm, ≥ 5 mm): κ = 0.723(p-value < 0.001). LR occurred in eight of nine(88.9%) incompletely ablated CRLM and in one of the nine completely ablated CRLM(11.1%). CONCLUSION: Co-registration using MIRADA is reproducible and potentially a valuable tool in defining technical success. Feasibility of co-registration of pre- and post-ablation CT scans is suboptimal if scans are not acquired concordantly. Co-registration may potentially aid in the prediction of LR after percutaneous ablation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12880-019-0360-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6700773
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67007732019-08-26 Quantitative margin assessment of radiofrequency ablation of a solitary colorectal hepatic metastasis using MIRADA RTx on CT scans: a feasibility study Sibinga Mulder, B. G. Hendriks, P. Baetens, T. R. van Erkel, A. R. van Rijswijk, C. S. P. van der Meer, R. W. van de Velde, C. J. H. Vahrmeijer, A. L. Mieog, J. S. D. Burgmans, M. C. BMC Med Imaging Technical Advance BACKGROUND: Compared to surgery, radiofrequency ablation(RFA) for colorectal liver metastasis(CRLM) is associated with higher local recurrence(LR) rates. A wide margin (at least 5 mm) is generally recommended to prevent LR, but the optimal method to assess ablation margins is yet to be established. The aim of our study was to evaluate the feasibility and reproducibility of CT-CT co-registration, using MIRADA software, in order to assess ablation margins of patients with CRLM. METHODS: In this retrospective study, pre- and post-ablation contrast-enhanced CT scans of 29 patients, treated with percutaneous RFA for a solitary CRLM, were co-registered. Co-registration was performed by two independent radiologist, based on venous structures in proximity to the tumor. Feasibility of CT-CT co-registration and inter-observer agreement for reproducibility and ablation margins was determined. Furthermore, the minimal ablation margin was compared with the occurrence of LR during follow-up. RESULTS: Co-registration was considered feasible in 18 patients (61% male, 63.1(±10.9) year), with a perfect inter-observer agreement for completeness of ablation: κ = 1.0(p < 0.001). And substantial inter-observer agreement for measurement of the minimal margin (≤ 0 mm, 1-5 mm, ≥ 5 mm): κ = 0.723(p-value < 0.001). LR occurred in eight of nine(88.9%) incompletely ablated CRLM and in one of the nine completely ablated CRLM(11.1%). CONCLUSION: Co-registration using MIRADA is reproducible and potentially a valuable tool in defining technical success. Feasibility of co-registration of pre- and post-ablation CT scans is suboptimal if scans are not acquired concordantly. Co-registration may potentially aid in the prediction of LR after percutaneous ablation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12880-019-0360-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6700773/ /pubmed/31429708 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-019-0360-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Technical Advance
Sibinga Mulder, B. G.
Hendriks, P.
Baetens, T. R.
van Erkel, A. R.
van Rijswijk, C. S. P.
van der Meer, R. W.
van de Velde, C. J. H.
Vahrmeijer, A. L.
Mieog, J. S. D.
Burgmans, M. C.
Quantitative margin assessment of radiofrequency ablation of a solitary colorectal hepatic metastasis using MIRADA RTx on CT scans: a feasibility study
title Quantitative margin assessment of radiofrequency ablation of a solitary colorectal hepatic metastasis using MIRADA RTx on CT scans: a feasibility study
title_full Quantitative margin assessment of radiofrequency ablation of a solitary colorectal hepatic metastasis using MIRADA RTx on CT scans: a feasibility study
title_fullStr Quantitative margin assessment of radiofrequency ablation of a solitary colorectal hepatic metastasis using MIRADA RTx on CT scans: a feasibility study
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative margin assessment of radiofrequency ablation of a solitary colorectal hepatic metastasis using MIRADA RTx on CT scans: a feasibility study
title_short Quantitative margin assessment of radiofrequency ablation of a solitary colorectal hepatic metastasis using MIRADA RTx on CT scans: a feasibility study
title_sort quantitative margin assessment of radiofrequency ablation of a solitary colorectal hepatic metastasis using mirada rtx on ct scans: a feasibility study
topic Technical Advance
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6700773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31429708
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-019-0360-2
work_keys_str_mv AT sibingamulderbg quantitativemarginassessmentofradiofrequencyablationofasolitarycolorectalhepaticmetastasisusingmiradartxonctscansafeasibilitystudy
AT hendriksp quantitativemarginassessmentofradiofrequencyablationofasolitarycolorectalhepaticmetastasisusingmiradartxonctscansafeasibilitystudy
AT baetenstr quantitativemarginassessmentofradiofrequencyablationofasolitarycolorectalhepaticmetastasisusingmiradartxonctscansafeasibilitystudy
AT vanerkelar quantitativemarginassessmentofradiofrequencyablationofasolitarycolorectalhepaticmetastasisusingmiradartxonctscansafeasibilitystudy
AT vanrijswijkcsp quantitativemarginassessmentofradiofrequencyablationofasolitarycolorectalhepaticmetastasisusingmiradartxonctscansafeasibilitystudy
AT vandermeerrw quantitativemarginassessmentofradiofrequencyablationofasolitarycolorectalhepaticmetastasisusingmiradartxonctscansafeasibilitystudy
AT vandeveldecjh quantitativemarginassessmentofradiofrequencyablationofasolitarycolorectalhepaticmetastasisusingmiradartxonctscansafeasibilitystudy
AT vahrmeijeral quantitativemarginassessmentofradiofrequencyablationofasolitarycolorectalhepaticmetastasisusingmiradartxonctscansafeasibilitystudy
AT mieogjsd quantitativemarginassessmentofradiofrequencyablationofasolitarycolorectalhepaticmetastasisusingmiradartxonctscansafeasibilitystudy
AT burgmansmc quantitativemarginassessmentofradiofrequencyablationofasolitarycolorectalhepaticmetastasisusingmiradartxonctscansafeasibilitystudy