Cargando…
New clinical guidelines on the spinal stabilisation of adult trauma patients – consensus and evidence based
Traumatic spinal cord injury is a relatively rare injury in Denmark but may result in serious neurological consequences. For decades, prehospital spinal stabilisation with a rigid cervical collar and a hard backboard has been considered to be the most appropriate procedure to prevent secondary spina...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6700785/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31426850 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-019-0655-x |
_version_ | 1783444930448850944 |
---|---|
author | Maschmann, Christian Jeppesen, Elisabeth Rubin, Monika Afzali Barfod, Charlotte |
author_facet | Maschmann, Christian Jeppesen, Elisabeth Rubin, Monika Afzali Barfod, Charlotte |
author_sort | Maschmann, Christian |
collection | PubMed |
description | Traumatic spinal cord injury is a relatively rare injury in Denmark but may result in serious neurological consequences. For decades, prehospital spinal stabilisation with a rigid cervical collar and a hard backboard has been considered to be the most appropriate procedure to prevent secondary spinal cord injuries during patient transportation. However, the procedure has been questioned in recent years, due to the lack of high-quality studies supporting its efficacy. A national interdisciplinary task force was therefore established to provide updated clinical guidelines on prehospital procedures for spinal stabilisation of adult trauma patients in Denmark. The guidelines are based on a systematic review of the literature and grading of the evidence, in addition to a standardised consensus process. This process yielded five main recommendations: A strong recommendation against spinal stabilisation of patients with isolated penetrating trauma; a weak recommendation against the prehospital use of a rigid cervical collar and a hard backboard for ABCDE-stable patients; and a weak recommendation for the use of a vacuum mattress for patient transportation. Finally, our group recommends the use of our clinical algorithm to ensure good clinical practice. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13049-019-0655-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6700785 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67007852019-08-26 New clinical guidelines on the spinal stabilisation of adult trauma patients – consensus and evidence based Maschmann, Christian Jeppesen, Elisabeth Rubin, Monika Afzali Barfod, Charlotte Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Guideline Traumatic spinal cord injury is a relatively rare injury in Denmark but may result in serious neurological consequences. For decades, prehospital spinal stabilisation with a rigid cervical collar and a hard backboard has been considered to be the most appropriate procedure to prevent secondary spinal cord injuries during patient transportation. However, the procedure has been questioned in recent years, due to the lack of high-quality studies supporting its efficacy. A national interdisciplinary task force was therefore established to provide updated clinical guidelines on prehospital procedures for spinal stabilisation of adult trauma patients in Denmark. The guidelines are based on a systematic review of the literature and grading of the evidence, in addition to a standardised consensus process. This process yielded five main recommendations: A strong recommendation against spinal stabilisation of patients with isolated penetrating trauma; a weak recommendation against the prehospital use of a rigid cervical collar and a hard backboard for ABCDE-stable patients; and a weak recommendation for the use of a vacuum mattress for patient transportation. Finally, our group recommends the use of our clinical algorithm to ensure good clinical practice. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13049-019-0655-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6700785/ /pubmed/31426850 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-019-0655-x Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Guideline Maschmann, Christian Jeppesen, Elisabeth Rubin, Monika Afzali Barfod, Charlotte New clinical guidelines on the spinal stabilisation of adult trauma patients – consensus and evidence based |
title | New clinical guidelines on the spinal stabilisation of adult trauma patients – consensus and evidence based |
title_full | New clinical guidelines on the spinal stabilisation of adult trauma patients – consensus and evidence based |
title_fullStr | New clinical guidelines on the spinal stabilisation of adult trauma patients – consensus and evidence based |
title_full_unstemmed | New clinical guidelines on the spinal stabilisation of adult trauma patients – consensus and evidence based |
title_short | New clinical guidelines on the spinal stabilisation of adult trauma patients – consensus and evidence based |
title_sort | new clinical guidelines on the spinal stabilisation of adult trauma patients – consensus and evidence based |
topic | Guideline |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6700785/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31426850 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-019-0655-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maschmannchristian newclinicalguidelinesonthespinalstabilisationofadulttraumapatientsconsensusandevidencebased AT jeppesenelisabeth newclinicalguidelinesonthespinalstabilisationofadulttraumapatientsconsensusandevidencebased AT rubinmonikaafzali newclinicalguidelinesonthespinalstabilisationofadulttraumapatientsconsensusandevidencebased AT barfodcharlotte newclinicalguidelinesonthespinalstabilisationofadulttraumapatientsconsensusandevidencebased |