Cargando…

First-Year Outcomes of Critical Congenital Heart Disease Screening in Maryland

Objectives. Newborn screening for critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) was added to the Recommended Uniform Screening Panel in 2011, and states have been gradually adding pulse oximetry as point-of-care screening to panels. Few data are available on the effectiveness of pulse oximetry as a manda...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Badawi, Deborah, Watson, Johnna, Maschke, Steven, Reid, Lawrence
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6700861/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31453268
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2333794X19868226
_version_ 1783444948719239168
author Badawi, Deborah
Watson, Johnna
Maschke, Steven
Reid, Lawrence
author_facet Badawi, Deborah
Watson, Johnna
Maschke, Steven
Reid, Lawrence
author_sort Badawi, Deborah
collection PubMed
description Objectives. Newborn screening for critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) was added to the Recommended Uniform Screening Panel in 2011, and states have been gradually adding pulse oximetry as point-of-care screening to panels. Few data are available on the effectiveness of pulse oximetry as a mandated screening. This study describes outcomes of the first year of screening in Maryland. Methods. A web-based data collection tool for screening results and outcomes, eScreener Plus, was utilized. Data collected from the start of screening from September 1, 2012, to December 31, 2013, were analyzed. Well-baby nursery data were evaluated separately from neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) data to determine whether setting influenced effectiveness. Results. In the first 15 months of newborn screening for CCHD in Maryland, 4 asymptomatic infants were diagnosed with a critical cardiac condition by newborn screening. Eleven infants passed but were later identified with a primary or secondary target condition. Seventy-one percent of infants with CCHD were identified prenatally or by clinical signs and symptoms. Pulse oximetry screening for CCHD had a specificity of more than 99% in both the well-baby nursery and the NICU. Sensitivity in the well-baby nursery was 10% and 60% in the NICU. Conclusion. Further investigation and interpretation of specific protocols that were used and outcomes of screening is needed for continued refinement of the well-baby algorithm and NICU protocol development. Pulse oximetry screening in newborns provides valuable clinical information, but many infants with CCHD are still not identified with current protocols.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6700861
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67008612019-08-26 First-Year Outcomes of Critical Congenital Heart Disease Screening in Maryland Badawi, Deborah Watson, Johnna Maschke, Steven Reid, Lawrence Glob Pediatr Health Original Article Objectives. Newborn screening for critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) was added to the Recommended Uniform Screening Panel in 2011, and states have been gradually adding pulse oximetry as point-of-care screening to panels. Few data are available on the effectiveness of pulse oximetry as a mandated screening. This study describes outcomes of the first year of screening in Maryland. Methods. A web-based data collection tool for screening results and outcomes, eScreener Plus, was utilized. Data collected from the start of screening from September 1, 2012, to December 31, 2013, were analyzed. Well-baby nursery data were evaluated separately from neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) data to determine whether setting influenced effectiveness. Results. In the first 15 months of newborn screening for CCHD in Maryland, 4 asymptomatic infants were diagnosed with a critical cardiac condition by newborn screening. Eleven infants passed but were later identified with a primary or secondary target condition. Seventy-one percent of infants with CCHD were identified prenatally or by clinical signs and symptoms. Pulse oximetry screening for CCHD had a specificity of more than 99% in both the well-baby nursery and the NICU. Sensitivity in the well-baby nursery was 10% and 60% in the NICU. Conclusion. Further investigation and interpretation of specific protocols that were used and outcomes of screening is needed for continued refinement of the well-baby algorithm and NICU protocol development. Pulse oximetry screening in newborns provides valuable clinical information, but many infants with CCHD are still not identified with current protocols. SAGE Publications 2019-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6700861/ /pubmed/31453268 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2333794X19868226 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Badawi, Deborah
Watson, Johnna
Maschke, Steven
Reid, Lawrence
First-Year Outcomes of Critical Congenital Heart Disease Screening in Maryland
title First-Year Outcomes of Critical Congenital Heart Disease Screening in Maryland
title_full First-Year Outcomes of Critical Congenital Heart Disease Screening in Maryland
title_fullStr First-Year Outcomes of Critical Congenital Heart Disease Screening in Maryland
title_full_unstemmed First-Year Outcomes of Critical Congenital Heart Disease Screening in Maryland
title_short First-Year Outcomes of Critical Congenital Heart Disease Screening in Maryland
title_sort first-year outcomes of critical congenital heart disease screening in maryland
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6700861/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31453268
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2333794X19868226
work_keys_str_mv AT badawideborah firstyearoutcomesofcriticalcongenitalheartdiseasescreeninginmaryland
AT watsonjohnna firstyearoutcomesofcriticalcongenitalheartdiseasescreeninginmaryland
AT maschkesteven firstyearoutcomesofcriticalcongenitalheartdiseasescreeninginmaryland
AT reidlawrence firstyearoutcomesofcriticalcongenitalheartdiseasescreeninginmaryland