Cargando…

Stressors and resources related to academic studies and improvements suggested by medical students: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND: Prior evidence suggests that medical students’ mental health is poor and deteriorates during the course of academic studies. This qualitative study therefore aims to improve our understanding of medical students’ perceptions of i) stressors related to their academic studies, ii) resource...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weber, Jeannette, Skodda, Stefanie, Muth, Thomas, Angerer, Peter, Loerbroks, Adrian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6701044/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31429744
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1747-z
_version_ 1783444987584708608
author Weber, Jeannette
Skodda, Stefanie
Muth, Thomas
Angerer, Peter
Loerbroks, Adrian
author_facet Weber, Jeannette
Skodda, Stefanie
Muth, Thomas
Angerer, Peter
Loerbroks, Adrian
author_sort Weber, Jeannette
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Prior evidence suggests that medical students’ mental health is poor and deteriorates during the course of academic studies. This qualitative study therefore aims to improve our understanding of medical students’ perceptions of i) stressors related to their academic studies, ii) resources that may facilitate coping with those stressors and iii) suggestions to potentially reduce stress. METHODS: Eight focus groups were conducted with medical students enrolled at a medical school in Germany until thematic saturation was reached. A topic guide was used to facilitate the discussion. Subsequently, focus group discussions were transcribed and content-analyzed using MaxQDA. RESULTS: Organizational factors especially related to inadequate information flow as well as exams (e.g. repeat exams, scheduling, perceived unfair grading), poor theoretical and practical teaching quality, time and performance pressure, social interactions and individual characteristics (e.g. self-expectations, fear of failure) emerged as major contributors to stress. Resources perceived to facilitate coping with those stressors pertained to some other organizational aspects (e.g. flexibility, availability of contact persons), career prospects, practical training, social support, personal characteristics (e.g. knowledge base, past experience) and leisure time. Suggestions for improvement related primarily to organizational measures rather than individual-level measures. CONCLUSIONS: Besides well-known stressors (e.g. exams and high performance pressure), some new aspects emerged from our study including stress related to organizational factors and repeat exams. Accordingly, students’ wishes for organizational-level interventions, including better information systems and better interweaving of practical and theoretical education, could be first target areas for improvement. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12909-019-1747-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6701044
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67010442019-08-26 Stressors and resources related to academic studies and improvements suggested by medical students: a qualitative study Weber, Jeannette Skodda, Stefanie Muth, Thomas Angerer, Peter Loerbroks, Adrian BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Prior evidence suggests that medical students’ mental health is poor and deteriorates during the course of academic studies. This qualitative study therefore aims to improve our understanding of medical students’ perceptions of i) stressors related to their academic studies, ii) resources that may facilitate coping with those stressors and iii) suggestions to potentially reduce stress. METHODS: Eight focus groups were conducted with medical students enrolled at a medical school in Germany until thematic saturation was reached. A topic guide was used to facilitate the discussion. Subsequently, focus group discussions were transcribed and content-analyzed using MaxQDA. RESULTS: Organizational factors especially related to inadequate information flow as well as exams (e.g. repeat exams, scheduling, perceived unfair grading), poor theoretical and practical teaching quality, time and performance pressure, social interactions and individual characteristics (e.g. self-expectations, fear of failure) emerged as major contributors to stress. Resources perceived to facilitate coping with those stressors pertained to some other organizational aspects (e.g. flexibility, availability of contact persons), career prospects, practical training, social support, personal characteristics (e.g. knowledge base, past experience) and leisure time. Suggestions for improvement related primarily to organizational measures rather than individual-level measures. CONCLUSIONS: Besides well-known stressors (e.g. exams and high performance pressure), some new aspects emerged from our study including stress related to organizational factors and repeat exams. Accordingly, students’ wishes for organizational-level interventions, including better information systems and better interweaving of practical and theoretical education, could be first target areas for improvement. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12909-019-1747-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6701044/ /pubmed/31429744 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1747-z Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Weber, Jeannette
Skodda, Stefanie
Muth, Thomas
Angerer, Peter
Loerbroks, Adrian
Stressors and resources related to academic studies and improvements suggested by medical students: a qualitative study
title Stressors and resources related to academic studies and improvements suggested by medical students: a qualitative study
title_full Stressors and resources related to academic studies and improvements suggested by medical students: a qualitative study
title_fullStr Stressors and resources related to academic studies and improvements suggested by medical students: a qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Stressors and resources related to academic studies and improvements suggested by medical students: a qualitative study
title_short Stressors and resources related to academic studies and improvements suggested by medical students: a qualitative study
title_sort stressors and resources related to academic studies and improvements suggested by medical students: a qualitative study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6701044/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31429744
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1747-z
work_keys_str_mv AT weberjeannette stressorsandresourcesrelatedtoacademicstudiesandimprovementssuggestedbymedicalstudentsaqualitativestudy
AT skoddastefanie stressorsandresourcesrelatedtoacademicstudiesandimprovementssuggestedbymedicalstudentsaqualitativestudy
AT muththomas stressorsandresourcesrelatedtoacademicstudiesandimprovementssuggestedbymedicalstudentsaqualitativestudy
AT angererpeter stressorsandresourcesrelatedtoacademicstudiesandimprovementssuggestedbymedicalstudentsaqualitativestudy
AT loerbroksadrian stressorsandresourcesrelatedtoacademicstudiesandimprovementssuggestedbymedicalstudentsaqualitativestudy