Cargando…
Perioperative chemotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemoradiation for patients with adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus in Austria: a retrospective analysis
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of patients with adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus (AEG type I) treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation or perioperative chemotherapy. METHODS: Eligible patients from four Austrian centers were selected to conduct a retrospective anal...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6701048/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31426805 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-019-1693-6 |
_version_ | 1783444988579807232 |
---|---|
author | Koch, Oliver O. Weitzendorfer, Michael Varga, Martin Tschoner, Andreas Partl, Richard Perathoner, Alexander Gehwolf, Philipp Kapp, Karin S. Függer, Reinhold Öfner, Dietmar Emmanuel, Klaus |
author_facet | Koch, Oliver O. Weitzendorfer, Michael Varga, Martin Tschoner, Andreas Partl, Richard Perathoner, Alexander Gehwolf, Philipp Kapp, Karin S. Függer, Reinhold Öfner, Dietmar Emmanuel, Klaus |
author_sort | Koch, Oliver O. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of patients with adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus (AEG type I) treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation or perioperative chemotherapy. METHODS: Eligible patients from four Austrian centers were selected to conduct a retrospective analysis. All patients treated between January 2007 and October 2017 with chemotherapy according to EOX-protocol (Epirubicin, Oxaliplatin, Xeloda) or chemoradiation according to CROSS-protocol (carboplatin/paclitaxel + RTX 41.4 Gy), before esophagectomy were included. Primary outcomes disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) as well as secondary outcomes downstaging of T- or N-stage and achievement of pathological complete response pCR (ypT0N0M0) were analyzed. Data of 119 patients were included. RESULTS: Complete data was available in 104 patients, 53 patients in the chemoradiation group and 51 patients in the chemotherapy group. The mean number of lymph nodes removed was significantly higher in the EOX group (EOX 29 ± 15.5 vs. CROSS 22 ± 8.8; p < 0.05). Median follow-up in the CROSS group was 17 months (CI 95% 8.8–25.2) and in the EOX group 37 months (CI 95% 26.5–47.5). In the chemotherapy group, the OS rate after half a year, − 1, and 3 years was 92%, 75%, and 51%. After chemoradiation, overall survival after half a year was 85 %, after 1 year 66%, and after 3 years 17%. In the EOX group DFS after ½, − 1, and 3 years was 90%, 73%, and 45%, in the chemoradiation group after half a year 81%, after 1 year 55% and after 3 years 15%. Pathological complete response (pCR) was achieved in 23% of patients after CROSS and in 10% after EOX (p < 0.000). CONCLUSIONS: There seem to be clear advantages for chemoradiation, concerning the major response of the primary tumor, whereas a tendency in favor for chemotherapy is seen in regards to systemic tumor control. Furthermore, the type of neoadjuvant treatment has a significant influence on the number of lymph nodes resected. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6701048 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67010482019-08-26 Perioperative chemotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemoradiation for patients with adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus in Austria: a retrospective analysis Koch, Oliver O. Weitzendorfer, Michael Varga, Martin Tschoner, Andreas Partl, Richard Perathoner, Alexander Gehwolf, Philipp Kapp, Karin S. Függer, Reinhold Öfner, Dietmar Emmanuel, Klaus World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of patients with adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus (AEG type I) treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation or perioperative chemotherapy. METHODS: Eligible patients from four Austrian centers were selected to conduct a retrospective analysis. All patients treated between January 2007 and October 2017 with chemotherapy according to EOX-protocol (Epirubicin, Oxaliplatin, Xeloda) or chemoradiation according to CROSS-protocol (carboplatin/paclitaxel + RTX 41.4 Gy), before esophagectomy were included. Primary outcomes disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) as well as secondary outcomes downstaging of T- or N-stage and achievement of pathological complete response pCR (ypT0N0M0) were analyzed. Data of 119 patients were included. RESULTS: Complete data was available in 104 patients, 53 patients in the chemoradiation group and 51 patients in the chemotherapy group. The mean number of lymph nodes removed was significantly higher in the EOX group (EOX 29 ± 15.5 vs. CROSS 22 ± 8.8; p < 0.05). Median follow-up in the CROSS group was 17 months (CI 95% 8.8–25.2) and in the EOX group 37 months (CI 95% 26.5–47.5). In the chemotherapy group, the OS rate after half a year, − 1, and 3 years was 92%, 75%, and 51%. After chemoradiation, overall survival after half a year was 85 %, after 1 year 66%, and after 3 years 17%. In the EOX group DFS after ½, − 1, and 3 years was 90%, 73%, and 45%, in the chemoradiation group after half a year 81%, after 1 year 55% and after 3 years 15%. Pathological complete response (pCR) was achieved in 23% of patients after CROSS and in 10% after EOX (p < 0.000). CONCLUSIONS: There seem to be clear advantages for chemoradiation, concerning the major response of the primary tumor, whereas a tendency in favor for chemotherapy is seen in regards to systemic tumor control. Furthermore, the type of neoadjuvant treatment has a significant influence on the number of lymph nodes resected. BioMed Central 2019-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6701048/ /pubmed/31426805 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-019-1693-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Koch, Oliver O. Weitzendorfer, Michael Varga, Martin Tschoner, Andreas Partl, Richard Perathoner, Alexander Gehwolf, Philipp Kapp, Karin S. Függer, Reinhold Öfner, Dietmar Emmanuel, Klaus Perioperative chemotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemoradiation for patients with adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus in Austria: a retrospective analysis |
title | Perioperative chemotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemoradiation for patients with adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus in Austria: a retrospective analysis |
title_full | Perioperative chemotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemoradiation for patients with adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus in Austria: a retrospective analysis |
title_fullStr | Perioperative chemotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemoradiation for patients with adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus in Austria: a retrospective analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Perioperative chemotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemoradiation for patients with adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus in Austria: a retrospective analysis |
title_short | Perioperative chemotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemoradiation for patients with adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus in Austria: a retrospective analysis |
title_sort | perioperative chemotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemoradiation for patients with adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus in austria: a retrospective analysis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6701048/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31426805 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-019-1693-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kocholivero perioperativechemotherapyversusneoadjuvantchemoradiationforpatientswithadenocarcinomaofthedistalesophagusinaustriaaretrospectiveanalysis AT weitzendorfermichael perioperativechemotherapyversusneoadjuvantchemoradiationforpatientswithadenocarcinomaofthedistalesophagusinaustriaaretrospectiveanalysis AT vargamartin perioperativechemotherapyversusneoadjuvantchemoradiationforpatientswithadenocarcinomaofthedistalesophagusinaustriaaretrospectiveanalysis AT tschonerandreas perioperativechemotherapyversusneoadjuvantchemoradiationforpatientswithadenocarcinomaofthedistalesophagusinaustriaaretrospectiveanalysis AT partlrichard perioperativechemotherapyversusneoadjuvantchemoradiationforpatientswithadenocarcinomaofthedistalesophagusinaustriaaretrospectiveanalysis AT perathoneralexander perioperativechemotherapyversusneoadjuvantchemoradiationforpatientswithadenocarcinomaofthedistalesophagusinaustriaaretrospectiveanalysis AT gehwolfphilipp perioperativechemotherapyversusneoadjuvantchemoradiationforpatientswithadenocarcinomaofthedistalesophagusinaustriaaretrospectiveanalysis AT kappkarins perioperativechemotherapyversusneoadjuvantchemoradiationforpatientswithadenocarcinomaofthedistalesophagusinaustriaaretrospectiveanalysis AT fuggerreinhold perioperativechemotherapyversusneoadjuvantchemoradiationforpatientswithadenocarcinomaofthedistalesophagusinaustriaaretrospectiveanalysis AT ofnerdietmar perioperativechemotherapyversusneoadjuvantchemoradiationforpatientswithadenocarcinomaofthedistalesophagusinaustriaaretrospectiveanalysis AT emmanuelklaus perioperativechemotherapyversusneoadjuvantchemoradiationforpatientswithadenocarcinomaofthedistalesophagusinaustriaaretrospectiveanalysis |