Cargando…

Risks to Health and Well-Being From Radio-Frequency Radiation Emitted by Cell Phones and Other Wireless Devices

Radiation exposure has long been a concern for the public, policy makers, and health researchers. Beginning with radar during World War II, human exposure to radio-frequency radiation (RFR) technologies has grown substantially over time. In 2011, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miller, Anthony B., Sears, Margaret E., Morgan, L. Lloyd, Davis, Devra L., Hardell, Lennart, Oremus, Mark, Soskolne, Colin L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6701402/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31457001
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00223
_version_ 1783445050991050752
author Miller, Anthony B.
Sears, Margaret E.
Morgan, L. Lloyd
Davis, Devra L.
Hardell, Lennart
Oremus, Mark
Soskolne, Colin L.
author_facet Miller, Anthony B.
Sears, Margaret E.
Morgan, L. Lloyd
Davis, Devra L.
Hardell, Lennart
Oremus, Mark
Soskolne, Colin L.
author_sort Miller, Anthony B.
collection PubMed
description Radiation exposure has long been a concern for the public, policy makers, and health researchers. Beginning with radar during World War II, human exposure to radio-frequency radiation (RFR) technologies has grown substantially over time. In 2011, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) reviewed the published literature and categorized RFR as a “possible” (Group 2B) human carcinogen. A broad range of adverse human health effects associated with RFR have been reported since the IARC review. In addition, three large-scale carcinogenicity studies in rodents exposed to levels of RFR that mimic lifetime human exposures have shown significantly increased rates of Schwannomas and malignant gliomas, as well as chromosomal DNA damage. Of particular concern are the effects of RFR exposure on the developing brain in children. Compared with an adult male, a cell phone held against the head of a child exposes deeper brain structures to greater radiation doses per unit volume, and the young, thin skull's bone marrow absorbs a roughly 10-fold higher local dose. Experimental and observational studies also suggest that men who keep cell phones in their trouser pockets have significantly lower sperm counts and significantly impaired sperm motility and morphology, including mitochondrial DNA damage. Based on the accumulated evidence, we recommend that IARC re-evaluate its 2011 classification of the human carcinogenicity of RFR, and that WHO complete a systematic review of multiple other health effects such as sperm damage. In the interim, current knowledge provides justification for governments, public health authorities, and physicians/allied health professionals to warn the population that having a cell phone next to the body is harmful, and to support measures to reduce all exposures to RFR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6701402
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67014022019-08-27 Risks to Health and Well-Being From Radio-Frequency Radiation Emitted by Cell Phones and Other Wireless Devices Miller, Anthony B. Sears, Margaret E. Morgan, L. Lloyd Davis, Devra L. Hardell, Lennart Oremus, Mark Soskolne, Colin L. Front Public Health Public Health Radiation exposure has long been a concern for the public, policy makers, and health researchers. Beginning with radar during World War II, human exposure to radio-frequency radiation (RFR) technologies has grown substantially over time. In 2011, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) reviewed the published literature and categorized RFR as a “possible” (Group 2B) human carcinogen. A broad range of adverse human health effects associated with RFR have been reported since the IARC review. In addition, three large-scale carcinogenicity studies in rodents exposed to levels of RFR that mimic lifetime human exposures have shown significantly increased rates of Schwannomas and malignant gliomas, as well as chromosomal DNA damage. Of particular concern are the effects of RFR exposure on the developing brain in children. Compared with an adult male, a cell phone held against the head of a child exposes deeper brain structures to greater radiation doses per unit volume, and the young, thin skull's bone marrow absorbs a roughly 10-fold higher local dose. Experimental and observational studies also suggest that men who keep cell phones in their trouser pockets have significantly lower sperm counts and significantly impaired sperm motility and morphology, including mitochondrial DNA damage. Based on the accumulated evidence, we recommend that IARC re-evaluate its 2011 classification of the human carcinogenicity of RFR, and that WHO complete a systematic review of multiple other health effects such as sperm damage. In the interim, current knowledge provides justification for governments, public health authorities, and physicians/allied health professionals to warn the population that having a cell phone next to the body is harmful, and to support measures to reduce all exposures to RFR. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6701402/ /pubmed/31457001 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00223 Text en Copyright © 2019 Miller, Sears, Morgan, Davis, Hardell, Oremus and Soskolne. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Public Health
Miller, Anthony B.
Sears, Margaret E.
Morgan, L. Lloyd
Davis, Devra L.
Hardell, Lennart
Oremus, Mark
Soskolne, Colin L.
Risks to Health and Well-Being From Radio-Frequency Radiation Emitted by Cell Phones and Other Wireless Devices
title Risks to Health and Well-Being From Radio-Frequency Radiation Emitted by Cell Phones and Other Wireless Devices
title_full Risks to Health and Well-Being From Radio-Frequency Radiation Emitted by Cell Phones and Other Wireless Devices
title_fullStr Risks to Health and Well-Being From Radio-Frequency Radiation Emitted by Cell Phones and Other Wireless Devices
title_full_unstemmed Risks to Health and Well-Being From Radio-Frequency Radiation Emitted by Cell Phones and Other Wireless Devices
title_short Risks to Health and Well-Being From Radio-Frequency Radiation Emitted by Cell Phones and Other Wireless Devices
title_sort risks to health and well-being from radio-frequency radiation emitted by cell phones and other wireless devices
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6701402/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31457001
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00223
work_keys_str_mv AT milleranthonyb riskstohealthandwellbeingfromradiofrequencyradiationemittedbycellphonesandotherwirelessdevices
AT searsmargarete riskstohealthandwellbeingfromradiofrequencyradiationemittedbycellphonesandotherwirelessdevices
AT morganllloyd riskstohealthandwellbeingfromradiofrequencyradiationemittedbycellphonesandotherwirelessdevices
AT davisdevral riskstohealthandwellbeingfromradiofrequencyradiationemittedbycellphonesandotherwirelessdevices
AT hardelllennart riskstohealthandwellbeingfromradiofrequencyradiationemittedbycellphonesandotherwirelessdevices
AT oremusmark riskstohealthandwellbeingfromradiofrequencyradiationemittedbycellphonesandotherwirelessdevices
AT soskolnecolinl riskstohealthandwellbeingfromradiofrequencyradiationemittedbycellphonesandotherwirelessdevices