Cargando…

Anthropomorphism Index of Mobility for Artificial Hands

The increasing development of anthropomorphic artificial hands makes necessary quick metrics that analyze their anthropomorphism. In this study, a human grasp experiment on the most important grasp types was undertaken in order to obtain an Anthropomorphism Index of Mobility (AIM) for artificial han...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Llop-Harillo, Immaculada, Pérez-González, Antonio, Gracia-Ibáñez, Verónica
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6701431/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31481977
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/7169034
_version_ 1783445057821474816
author Llop-Harillo, Immaculada
Pérez-González, Antonio
Gracia-Ibáñez, Verónica
author_facet Llop-Harillo, Immaculada
Pérez-González, Antonio
Gracia-Ibáñez, Verónica
author_sort Llop-Harillo, Immaculada
collection PubMed
description The increasing development of anthropomorphic artificial hands makes necessary quick metrics that analyze their anthropomorphism. In this study, a human grasp experiment on the most important grasp types was undertaken in order to obtain an Anthropomorphism Index of Mobility (AIM) for artificial hands. The AIM evaluates the topology of the whole hand, joints and degrees of freedom (DoFs), and the possibility to control these DoFs independently. It uses a set of weighting factors, obtained from analysis of human grasping, depending on the relevance of the different groups of DoFs of the hand. The computation of the index is straightforward, making it a useful tool for analyzing new artificial hands in early stages of the design process and for grading human-likeness of existing artificial hands. Thirteen artificial hands, both prosthetic and robotic, were evaluated and compared using the AIM, highlighting the reasons behind their differences. The AIM was also compared with other indexes in the literature with more cumbersome computation, ranking equally different artificial hands. As the index was primarily proposed for prosthetic hands, normally used as nondominant hands in unilateral amputees, the grasp types selected for the human grasp experiment were the most relevant for the human nondominant hand to reinforce bimanual grasping in activities of daily living. However, it was shown that the effect of using the grasping information from the dominant hand is small, indicating that the index is also valid for evaluating the artificial hand as dominant and so being valid for bilateral amputees or robotic hands.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6701431
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67014312019-09-03 Anthropomorphism Index of Mobility for Artificial Hands Llop-Harillo, Immaculada Pérez-González, Antonio Gracia-Ibáñez, Verónica Appl Bionics Biomech Research Article The increasing development of anthropomorphic artificial hands makes necessary quick metrics that analyze their anthropomorphism. In this study, a human grasp experiment on the most important grasp types was undertaken in order to obtain an Anthropomorphism Index of Mobility (AIM) for artificial hands. The AIM evaluates the topology of the whole hand, joints and degrees of freedom (DoFs), and the possibility to control these DoFs independently. It uses a set of weighting factors, obtained from analysis of human grasping, depending on the relevance of the different groups of DoFs of the hand. The computation of the index is straightforward, making it a useful tool for analyzing new artificial hands in early stages of the design process and for grading human-likeness of existing artificial hands. Thirteen artificial hands, both prosthetic and robotic, were evaluated and compared using the AIM, highlighting the reasons behind their differences. The AIM was also compared with other indexes in the literature with more cumbersome computation, ranking equally different artificial hands. As the index was primarily proposed for prosthetic hands, normally used as nondominant hands in unilateral amputees, the grasp types selected for the human grasp experiment were the most relevant for the human nondominant hand to reinforce bimanual grasping in activities of daily living. However, it was shown that the effect of using the grasping information from the dominant hand is small, indicating that the index is also valid for evaluating the artificial hand as dominant and so being valid for bilateral amputees or robotic hands. Hindawi 2019-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6701431/ /pubmed/31481977 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/7169034 Text en Copyright © 2019 Immaculada Llop-Harillo et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Llop-Harillo, Immaculada
Pérez-González, Antonio
Gracia-Ibáñez, Verónica
Anthropomorphism Index of Mobility for Artificial Hands
title Anthropomorphism Index of Mobility for Artificial Hands
title_full Anthropomorphism Index of Mobility for Artificial Hands
title_fullStr Anthropomorphism Index of Mobility for Artificial Hands
title_full_unstemmed Anthropomorphism Index of Mobility for Artificial Hands
title_short Anthropomorphism Index of Mobility for Artificial Hands
title_sort anthropomorphism index of mobility for artificial hands
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6701431/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31481977
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/7169034
work_keys_str_mv AT llopharilloimmaculada anthropomorphismindexofmobilityforartificialhands
AT perezgonzalezantonio anthropomorphismindexofmobilityforartificialhands
AT graciaibanezveronica anthropomorphismindexofmobilityforartificialhands