Cargando…

Respiratory Mandibular Movement Signals Reliably Identify Obstructive Hypopnea Events During Sleep

Context: Accurate discrimination between obstructive and central hypopneas requires quantitative assessments of respiratory effort by esophageal pressure (OeP) measurements, which preclude widespread implementation in sleep medicine practice. Mandibular Movement (MM) signals are closely associated w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martinot, Jean-Benoit, Le-Dong, Nhat-Nam, Cuthbert, Valerie, Denison, Stephane, Borel, Jean C., Gozal, David, Pépin, Jean L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6701450/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31456731
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.00828
Descripción
Sumario:Context: Accurate discrimination between obstructive and central hypopneas requires quantitative assessments of respiratory effort by esophageal pressure (OeP) measurements, which preclude widespread implementation in sleep medicine practice. Mandibular Movement (MM) signals are closely associated with diaphragmatic effort during sleep. Objective: We aimed at reliably detecting obstructive off central hypopneas events using MM statistical characteristics. Methods: A bio-signal learning approach was implemented whereby raw MM fragments corresponding to normal breathing (NPB; n = 501), central (n = 263), and obstructive hypopneas (n = 1861) were collected from 28 consecutive patients (mean age = 54 years, mean AHI = 34.7 n/h) undergoing in-lab polysomnography (PSG) coupled with a MM magnetometer, and OeP recordings. Twenty three input features were extracted from raw data fragments to explore distinctive changes in MM signals. A Random Forest model was built upon those input features to classify the central and obstructive hypopnea events. External validation and interpretive analysis were performed to evaluate the model's performance and the contribution of each feature to the model's output. Results: Obstructive hypopneas were characterized by a longer duration (21.9 vs. 17.8 s, p < 10(−6)), more extreme low values (p < 10(−6)), a more negative trend reflecting mouth opening amplitude, wider variation, and the asymmetrical distribution of MM amplitude. External validation showed a reliable performance of the MM features-based classification rule (Kappa coefficient = 0.879 and a balanced accuracy of 0.872). The interpretive analysis revealed that event duration, lower percentiles, central tendency, and the trend of MM amplitude were the most important determinants of events. Conclusions: MM signals can be used as surrogate markers of OeP to differentiate obstructive from central hypopneas during sleep.