Cargando…
Examining the predictive accuracy of metabolomics for small-for-gestational-age babies: a systematic review
INTRODUCTION: To date, there is no robust enough test to predict small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infants, who are at increased lifelong risk of morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of metabolomics in predicting SGA babies and elucidate which metabolites are predictive of thi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6701563/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31401613 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031238 |
_version_ | 1783445068716179456 |
---|---|
author | Leite, Debora Farias Batista Morillon, Aude-Claire Melo Júnior, Elias F Souza, Renato T McCarthy, Fergus P Khashan, Ali Baker, Philip Kenny, Louise C Cecatti, Jose Guilherme |
author_facet | Leite, Debora Farias Batista Morillon, Aude-Claire Melo Júnior, Elias F Souza, Renato T McCarthy, Fergus P Khashan, Ali Baker, Philip Kenny, Louise C Cecatti, Jose Guilherme |
author_sort | Leite, Debora Farias Batista |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: To date, there is no robust enough test to predict small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infants, who are at increased lifelong risk of morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of metabolomics in predicting SGA babies and elucidate which metabolites are predictive of this condition. DATA SOURCES: Two independent researchers explored 11 electronic databases and grey literature in February 2018 and November 2018, covering publications from 1998 to 2018. Both researchers performed data extraction and quality assessment independently. A third researcher resolved discrepancies. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Cohort or nested case–control studies were included which investigated pregnant women and performed metabolomics analysis to evaluate SGA infants. The primary outcome was birth weight <10th centile—as a surrogate for fetal growth restriction—by population-based or customised charts. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: Two independent researchers extracted data on study design, obstetric variables and sampling, metabolomics technique, chemical class of metabolites, and prediction accuracy measures. Authors were contacted to provide additional data when necessary. RESULTS: A total of 9181 references were retrieved. Of these, 273 were duplicate, 8760 were removed by title or abstract, and 133 were excluded by full-text content. Thus, 15 studies were included. Only two studies used the fifth centile as a cut-off, and most reports sampled second-trimester pregnant women. Liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry was the most common metabolomics approach. Untargeted studies in the second trimester provided the largest number of predictive metabolites, using maternal blood or hair. Fatty acids, phosphosphingolipids and amino acids were the most prevalent predictive chemical subclasses. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Significant heterogeneity of participant characteristics and methods employed among studies precluded a meta-analysis. Compounds related to lipid metabolism should be validated up to the second trimester in different settings. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018089985. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6701563 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67015632019-09-02 Examining the predictive accuracy of metabolomics for small-for-gestational-age babies: a systematic review Leite, Debora Farias Batista Morillon, Aude-Claire Melo Júnior, Elias F Souza, Renato T McCarthy, Fergus P Khashan, Ali Baker, Philip Kenny, Louise C Cecatti, Jose Guilherme BMJ Open Obstetrics and Gynaecology INTRODUCTION: To date, there is no robust enough test to predict small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infants, who are at increased lifelong risk of morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of metabolomics in predicting SGA babies and elucidate which metabolites are predictive of this condition. DATA SOURCES: Two independent researchers explored 11 electronic databases and grey literature in February 2018 and November 2018, covering publications from 1998 to 2018. Both researchers performed data extraction and quality assessment independently. A third researcher resolved discrepancies. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Cohort or nested case–control studies were included which investigated pregnant women and performed metabolomics analysis to evaluate SGA infants. The primary outcome was birth weight <10th centile—as a surrogate for fetal growth restriction—by population-based or customised charts. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: Two independent researchers extracted data on study design, obstetric variables and sampling, metabolomics technique, chemical class of metabolites, and prediction accuracy measures. Authors were contacted to provide additional data when necessary. RESULTS: A total of 9181 references were retrieved. Of these, 273 were duplicate, 8760 were removed by title or abstract, and 133 were excluded by full-text content. Thus, 15 studies were included. Only two studies used the fifth centile as a cut-off, and most reports sampled second-trimester pregnant women. Liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry was the most common metabolomics approach. Untargeted studies in the second trimester provided the largest number of predictive metabolites, using maternal blood or hair. Fatty acids, phosphosphingolipids and amino acids were the most prevalent predictive chemical subclasses. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Significant heterogeneity of participant characteristics and methods employed among studies precluded a meta-analysis. Compounds related to lipid metabolism should be validated up to the second trimester in different settings. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018089985. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6701563/ /pubmed/31401613 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031238 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Obstetrics and Gynaecology Leite, Debora Farias Batista Morillon, Aude-Claire Melo Júnior, Elias F Souza, Renato T McCarthy, Fergus P Khashan, Ali Baker, Philip Kenny, Louise C Cecatti, Jose Guilherme Examining the predictive accuracy of metabolomics for small-for-gestational-age babies: a systematic review |
title | Examining the predictive accuracy of metabolomics for small-for-gestational-age babies: a systematic review |
title_full | Examining the predictive accuracy of metabolomics for small-for-gestational-age babies: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Examining the predictive accuracy of metabolomics for small-for-gestational-age babies: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Examining the predictive accuracy of metabolomics for small-for-gestational-age babies: a systematic review |
title_short | Examining the predictive accuracy of metabolomics for small-for-gestational-age babies: a systematic review |
title_sort | examining the predictive accuracy of metabolomics for small-for-gestational-age babies: a systematic review |
topic | Obstetrics and Gynaecology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6701563/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31401613 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031238 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leitedeborafariasbatista examiningthepredictiveaccuracyofmetabolomicsforsmallforgestationalagebabiesasystematicreview AT morillonaudeclaire examiningthepredictiveaccuracyofmetabolomicsforsmallforgestationalagebabiesasystematicreview AT melojunioreliasf examiningthepredictiveaccuracyofmetabolomicsforsmallforgestationalagebabiesasystematicreview AT souzarenatot examiningthepredictiveaccuracyofmetabolomicsforsmallforgestationalagebabiesasystematicreview AT mccarthyfergusp examiningthepredictiveaccuracyofmetabolomicsforsmallforgestationalagebabiesasystematicreview AT khashanali examiningthepredictiveaccuracyofmetabolomicsforsmallforgestationalagebabiesasystematicreview AT bakerphilip examiningthepredictiveaccuracyofmetabolomicsforsmallforgestationalagebabiesasystematicreview AT kennylouisec examiningthepredictiveaccuracyofmetabolomicsforsmallforgestationalagebabiesasystematicreview AT cecattijoseguilherme examiningthepredictiveaccuracyofmetabolomicsforsmallforgestationalagebabiesasystematicreview |