Cargando…

Examining the predictive accuracy of metabolomics for small-for-gestational-age babies: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION: To date, there is no robust enough test to predict small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infants, who are at increased lifelong risk of morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of metabolomics in predicting SGA babies and elucidate which metabolites are predictive of thi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leite, Debora Farias Batista, Morillon, Aude-Claire, Melo Júnior, Elias F, Souza, Renato T, McCarthy, Fergus P, Khashan, Ali, Baker, Philip, Kenny, Louise C, Cecatti, Jose Guilherme
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6701563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31401613
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031238
_version_ 1783445068716179456
author Leite, Debora Farias Batista
Morillon, Aude-Claire
Melo Júnior, Elias F
Souza, Renato T
McCarthy, Fergus P
Khashan, Ali
Baker, Philip
Kenny, Louise C
Cecatti, Jose Guilherme
author_facet Leite, Debora Farias Batista
Morillon, Aude-Claire
Melo Júnior, Elias F
Souza, Renato T
McCarthy, Fergus P
Khashan, Ali
Baker, Philip
Kenny, Louise C
Cecatti, Jose Guilherme
author_sort Leite, Debora Farias Batista
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: To date, there is no robust enough test to predict small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infants, who are at increased lifelong risk of morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of metabolomics in predicting SGA babies and elucidate which metabolites are predictive of this condition. DATA SOURCES: Two independent researchers explored 11 electronic databases and grey literature in February 2018 and November 2018, covering publications from 1998 to 2018. Both researchers performed data extraction and quality assessment independently. A third researcher resolved discrepancies. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Cohort or nested case–control studies were included which investigated pregnant women and performed metabolomics analysis to evaluate SGA infants. The primary outcome was birth weight <10th centile—as a surrogate for fetal growth restriction—by population-based or customised charts. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: Two independent researchers extracted data on study design, obstetric variables and sampling, metabolomics technique, chemical class of metabolites, and prediction accuracy measures. Authors were contacted to provide additional data when necessary. RESULTS: A total of 9181 references were retrieved. Of these, 273 were duplicate, 8760 were removed by title or abstract, and 133 were excluded by full-text content. Thus, 15 studies were included. Only two studies used the fifth centile as a cut-off, and most reports sampled second-trimester pregnant women. Liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry was the most common metabolomics approach. Untargeted studies in the second trimester provided the largest number of predictive metabolites, using maternal blood or hair. Fatty acids, phosphosphingolipids and amino acids were the most prevalent predictive chemical subclasses. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Significant heterogeneity of participant characteristics and methods employed among studies precluded a meta-analysis. Compounds related to lipid metabolism should be validated up to the second trimester in different settings. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018089985.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6701563
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67015632019-09-02 Examining the predictive accuracy of metabolomics for small-for-gestational-age babies: a systematic review Leite, Debora Farias Batista Morillon, Aude-Claire Melo Júnior, Elias F Souza, Renato T McCarthy, Fergus P Khashan, Ali Baker, Philip Kenny, Louise C Cecatti, Jose Guilherme BMJ Open Obstetrics and Gynaecology INTRODUCTION: To date, there is no robust enough test to predict small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infants, who are at increased lifelong risk of morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of metabolomics in predicting SGA babies and elucidate which metabolites are predictive of this condition. DATA SOURCES: Two independent researchers explored 11 electronic databases and grey literature in February 2018 and November 2018, covering publications from 1998 to 2018. Both researchers performed data extraction and quality assessment independently. A third researcher resolved discrepancies. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Cohort or nested case–control studies were included which investigated pregnant women and performed metabolomics analysis to evaluate SGA infants. The primary outcome was birth weight <10th centile—as a surrogate for fetal growth restriction—by population-based or customised charts. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: Two independent researchers extracted data on study design, obstetric variables and sampling, metabolomics technique, chemical class of metabolites, and prediction accuracy measures. Authors were contacted to provide additional data when necessary. RESULTS: A total of 9181 references were retrieved. Of these, 273 were duplicate, 8760 were removed by title or abstract, and 133 were excluded by full-text content. Thus, 15 studies were included. Only two studies used the fifth centile as a cut-off, and most reports sampled second-trimester pregnant women. Liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry was the most common metabolomics approach. Untargeted studies in the second trimester provided the largest number of predictive metabolites, using maternal blood or hair. Fatty acids, phosphosphingolipids and amino acids were the most prevalent predictive chemical subclasses. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Significant heterogeneity of participant characteristics and methods employed among studies precluded a meta-analysis. Compounds related to lipid metabolism should be validated up to the second trimester in different settings. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018089985. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6701563/ /pubmed/31401613 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031238 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Leite, Debora Farias Batista
Morillon, Aude-Claire
Melo Júnior, Elias F
Souza, Renato T
McCarthy, Fergus P
Khashan, Ali
Baker, Philip
Kenny, Louise C
Cecatti, Jose Guilherme
Examining the predictive accuracy of metabolomics for small-for-gestational-age babies: a systematic review
title Examining the predictive accuracy of metabolomics for small-for-gestational-age babies: a systematic review
title_full Examining the predictive accuracy of metabolomics for small-for-gestational-age babies: a systematic review
title_fullStr Examining the predictive accuracy of metabolomics for small-for-gestational-age babies: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Examining the predictive accuracy of metabolomics for small-for-gestational-age babies: a systematic review
title_short Examining the predictive accuracy of metabolomics for small-for-gestational-age babies: a systematic review
title_sort examining the predictive accuracy of metabolomics for small-for-gestational-age babies: a systematic review
topic Obstetrics and Gynaecology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6701563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31401613
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031238
work_keys_str_mv AT leitedeborafariasbatista examiningthepredictiveaccuracyofmetabolomicsforsmallforgestationalagebabiesasystematicreview
AT morillonaudeclaire examiningthepredictiveaccuracyofmetabolomicsforsmallforgestationalagebabiesasystematicreview
AT melojunioreliasf examiningthepredictiveaccuracyofmetabolomicsforsmallforgestationalagebabiesasystematicreview
AT souzarenatot examiningthepredictiveaccuracyofmetabolomicsforsmallforgestationalagebabiesasystematicreview
AT mccarthyfergusp examiningthepredictiveaccuracyofmetabolomicsforsmallforgestationalagebabiesasystematicreview
AT khashanali examiningthepredictiveaccuracyofmetabolomicsforsmallforgestationalagebabiesasystematicreview
AT bakerphilip examiningthepredictiveaccuracyofmetabolomicsforsmallforgestationalagebabiesasystematicreview
AT kennylouisec examiningthepredictiveaccuracyofmetabolomicsforsmallforgestationalagebabiesasystematicreview
AT cecattijoseguilherme examiningthepredictiveaccuracyofmetabolomicsforsmallforgestationalagebabiesasystematicreview