Cargando…

Study protocol for ‘The Project About Loneliness and Social networks (PALS)’: a pragmatic, randomised trial comparing a facilitated social network intervention (Genie) with a wait-list control for lonely and socially isolated people

INTRODUCTION: Loneliness and social isolation have been identified as significant public health concerns, but improving relationships and increasing social participation may improve health outcomes and quality of life. The aim of the Project About Loneliness and Social networks (PALS) study is to as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Band, Rebecca, Ewings, Sean, Cheetham-Blake, Tara, Ellis, Jaimie, Breheny, Katie, Vassilev, Ivaylo, Portillo, Mari Carmen, Yardley, Lucy, Blickem, Christian, Kandiyali, Rebecca, Culliford, David, Rogers, Anne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6701612/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31427326
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028718
_version_ 1783445080711888896
author Band, Rebecca
Ewings, Sean
Cheetham-Blake, Tara
Ellis, Jaimie
Breheny, Katie
Vassilev, Ivaylo
Portillo, Mari Carmen
Yardley, Lucy
Blickem, Christian
Kandiyali, Rebecca
Culliford, David
Rogers, Anne
author_facet Band, Rebecca
Ewings, Sean
Cheetham-Blake, Tara
Ellis, Jaimie
Breheny, Katie
Vassilev, Ivaylo
Portillo, Mari Carmen
Yardley, Lucy
Blickem, Christian
Kandiyali, Rebecca
Culliford, David
Rogers, Anne
author_sort Band, Rebecca
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Loneliness and social isolation have been identified as significant public health concerns, but improving relationships and increasing social participation may improve health outcomes and quality of life. The aim of the Project About Loneliness and Social networks (PALS) study is to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a guided social network intervention within a community setting among individuals experiencing loneliness and isolation and to understand implementation of Generating Engagement in Network Involvement (Genie) in the context of different organisations. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The PALS trial will be a pragmatic, randomised controlled trial comparing participants receiving the Genie intervention to a wait-list control group. Eligible participants will be recruited from organisations working within a community setting: any adult identified as socially isolated or at-risk of loneliness and living in the community will be eligible. Genie will be delivered by trained facilitators recruited from community organisations. The primary outcome will be the difference in the SF-12 Mental Health composite scale score at 6-month follow-up between the intervention and control group using a mixed effects model (accounting for clustering within facilitators and organisation). Secondary outcomes will be loneliness, social isolation, well-being, physical health and engagement with new activities. The economic evaluation will use a cost-utility approach, and adopt a public sector perspective to include health-related resource use and costs incurred by other public services. Exploratory analysis will use a societal perspective, and explore broader measures of benefit (capability well-being). A qualitative process evaluation will explore organisational and environmental arrangements, as well as stakeholder and participant experiences of the study to understand the factors likely to influence future sustainability, implementation and scalability of using a social network intervention within this context. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has received NHS ethical approval (REC reference: 18/SC/0245). The findings from PALS will be disseminated widely through peer-reviewed publications, conferences and workshops in collaboration with our community partners. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN19193075
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6701612
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67016122019-09-02 Study protocol for ‘The Project About Loneliness and Social networks (PALS)’: a pragmatic, randomised trial comparing a facilitated social network intervention (Genie) with a wait-list control for lonely and socially isolated people Band, Rebecca Ewings, Sean Cheetham-Blake, Tara Ellis, Jaimie Breheny, Katie Vassilev, Ivaylo Portillo, Mari Carmen Yardley, Lucy Blickem, Christian Kandiyali, Rebecca Culliford, David Rogers, Anne BMJ Open Public Health INTRODUCTION: Loneliness and social isolation have been identified as significant public health concerns, but improving relationships and increasing social participation may improve health outcomes and quality of life. The aim of the Project About Loneliness and Social networks (PALS) study is to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a guided social network intervention within a community setting among individuals experiencing loneliness and isolation and to understand implementation of Generating Engagement in Network Involvement (Genie) in the context of different organisations. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The PALS trial will be a pragmatic, randomised controlled trial comparing participants receiving the Genie intervention to a wait-list control group. Eligible participants will be recruited from organisations working within a community setting: any adult identified as socially isolated or at-risk of loneliness and living in the community will be eligible. Genie will be delivered by trained facilitators recruited from community organisations. The primary outcome will be the difference in the SF-12 Mental Health composite scale score at 6-month follow-up between the intervention and control group using a mixed effects model (accounting for clustering within facilitators and organisation). Secondary outcomes will be loneliness, social isolation, well-being, physical health and engagement with new activities. The economic evaluation will use a cost-utility approach, and adopt a public sector perspective to include health-related resource use and costs incurred by other public services. Exploratory analysis will use a societal perspective, and explore broader measures of benefit (capability well-being). A qualitative process evaluation will explore organisational and environmental arrangements, as well as stakeholder and participant experiences of the study to understand the factors likely to influence future sustainability, implementation and scalability of using a social network intervention within this context. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has received NHS ethical approval (REC reference: 18/SC/0245). The findings from PALS will be disseminated widely through peer-reviewed publications, conferences and workshops in collaboration with our community partners. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN19193075 BMJ Publishing Group 2019-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6701612/ /pubmed/31427326 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028718 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Public Health
Band, Rebecca
Ewings, Sean
Cheetham-Blake, Tara
Ellis, Jaimie
Breheny, Katie
Vassilev, Ivaylo
Portillo, Mari Carmen
Yardley, Lucy
Blickem, Christian
Kandiyali, Rebecca
Culliford, David
Rogers, Anne
Study protocol for ‘The Project About Loneliness and Social networks (PALS)’: a pragmatic, randomised trial comparing a facilitated social network intervention (Genie) with a wait-list control for lonely and socially isolated people
title Study protocol for ‘The Project About Loneliness and Social networks (PALS)’: a pragmatic, randomised trial comparing a facilitated social network intervention (Genie) with a wait-list control for lonely and socially isolated people
title_full Study protocol for ‘The Project About Loneliness and Social networks (PALS)’: a pragmatic, randomised trial comparing a facilitated social network intervention (Genie) with a wait-list control for lonely and socially isolated people
title_fullStr Study protocol for ‘The Project About Loneliness and Social networks (PALS)’: a pragmatic, randomised trial comparing a facilitated social network intervention (Genie) with a wait-list control for lonely and socially isolated people
title_full_unstemmed Study protocol for ‘The Project About Loneliness and Social networks (PALS)’: a pragmatic, randomised trial comparing a facilitated social network intervention (Genie) with a wait-list control for lonely and socially isolated people
title_short Study protocol for ‘The Project About Loneliness and Social networks (PALS)’: a pragmatic, randomised trial comparing a facilitated social network intervention (Genie) with a wait-list control for lonely and socially isolated people
title_sort study protocol for ‘the project about loneliness and social networks (pals)’: a pragmatic, randomised trial comparing a facilitated social network intervention (genie) with a wait-list control for lonely and socially isolated people
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6701612/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31427326
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028718
work_keys_str_mv AT bandrebecca studyprotocolfortheprojectaboutlonelinessandsocialnetworkspalsapragmaticrandomisedtrialcomparingafacilitatedsocialnetworkinterventiongeniewithawaitlistcontrolforlonelyandsociallyisolatedpeople
AT ewingssean studyprotocolfortheprojectaboutlonelinessandsocialnetworkspalsapragmaticrandomisedtrialcomparingafacilitatedsocialnetworkinterventiongeniewithawaitlistcontrolforlonelyandsociallyisolatedpeople
AT cheethamblaketara studyprotocolfortheprojectaboutlonelinessandsocialnetworkspalsapragmaticrandomisedtrialcomparingafacilitatedsocialnetworkinterventiongeniewithawaitlistcontrolforlonelyandsociallyisolatedpeople
AT ellisjaimie studyprotocolfortheprojectaboutlonelinessandsocialnetworkspalsapragmaticrandomisedtrialcomparingafacilitatedsocialnetworkinterventiongeniewithawaitlistcontrolforlonelyandsociallyisolatedpeople
AT brehenykatie studyprotocolfortheprojectaboutlonelinessandsocialnetworkspalsapragmaticrandomisedtrialcomparingafacilitatedsocialnetworkinterventiongeniewithawaitlistcontrolforlonelyandsociallyisolatedpeople
AT vassilevivaylo studyprotocolfortheprojectaboutlonelinessandsocialnetworkspalsapragmaticrandomisedtrialcomparingafacilitatedsocialnetworkinterventiongeniewithawaitlistcontrolforlonelyandsociallyisolatedpeople
AT portillomaricarmen studyprotocolfortheprojectaboutlonelinessandsocialnetworkspalsapragmaticrandomisedtrialcomparingafacilitatedsocialnetworkinterventiongeniewithawaitlistcontrolforlonelyandsociallyisolatedpeople
AT yardleylucy studyprotocolfortheprojectaboutlonelinessandsocialnetworkspalsapragmaticrandomisedtrialcomparingafacilitatedsocialnetworkinterventiongeniewithawaitlistcontrolforlonelyandsociallyisolatedpeople
AT blickemchristian studyprotocolfortheprojectaboutlonelinessandsocialnetworkspalsapragmaticrandomisedtrialcomparingafacilitatedsocialnetworkinterventiongeniewithawaitlistcontrolforlonelyandsociallyisolatedpeople
AT kandiyalirebecca studyprotocolfortheprojectaboutlonelinessandsocialnetworkspalsapragmaticrandomisedtrialcomparingafacilitatedsocialnetworkinterventiongeniewithawaitlistcontrolforlonelyandsociallyisolatedpeople
AT culliforddavid studyprotocolfortheprojectaboutlonelinessandsocialnetworkspalsapragmaticrandomisedtrialcomparingafacilitatedsocialnetworkinterventiongeniewithawaitlistcontrolforlonelyandsociallyisolatedpeople
AT rogersanne studyprotocolfortheprojectaboutlonelinessandsocialnetworkspalsapragmaticrandomisedtrialcomparingafacilitatedsocialnetworkinterventiongeniewithawaitlistcontrolforlonelyandsociallyisolatedpeople