Cargando…

Multicentre, prospective observational study of the correlation between the Glasgow Admission Prediction Score and adverse outcomes

OBJECTIVES: To assess whether the Glasgow Admission Prediction Score (GAPS) is correlated with hospital length of stay, 6-month hospital readmission and 6-month all-cause mortality. This study represents a 6-month follow-up of patients who were included in an external validation of the GAPS’ ability...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jones, Dominic, Cameron, Allan, Lowe, David J, Mason, Suzanne M, O'Keeffe, Colin A, Logan, Eilidh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6701614/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31401591
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026599
_version_ 1783445081185845248
author Jones, Dominic
Cameron, Allan
Lowe, David J
Mason, Suzanne M
O'Keeffe, Colin A
Logan, Eilidh
author_facet Jones, Dominic
Cameron, Allan
Lowe, David J
Mason, Suzanne M
O'Keeffe, Colin A
Logan, Eilidh
author_sort Jones, Dominic
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To assess whether the Glasgow Admission Prediction Score (GAPS) is correlated with hospital length of stay, 6-month hospital readmission and 6-month all-cause mortality. This study represents a 6-month follow-up of patients who were included in an external validation of the GAPS’ ability to predict admission at the point of triage. SETTING: Sampling was conducted between February and May 2016 at two separate emergency departments (EDs) in Sheffield and Glasgow. PARTICIPANTS: Data were collected prospectively at triage for consecutive adult patients who presented to the ED within sampling times. Any patients who avoided formal triage were excluded from the study. In total, 1420 patients were recruited. PRIMARY OUTCOMES: GAPS was calculated following triage and did not influence patient management. Length of hospital stay, hospital readmission and mortality against GAPS were modelled using survival analysis at 6 months. RESULTS: Of the 1420 patients recruited, 39.6% of these patients were initially admitted to hospital. At 6 months, 30.6% of patients had been readmitted and 5.6% of patients had died. For those admitted at first presentation, the chance of being discharged fell by 4.3% (95% CI 3.2% to 5.3%) per GAPS point increase. Cox regression indicated a 9.2% (95% CI 7.3% to 11.1%) increase in the chance of 6-month hospital readmission per point increase in GAPS. An association between GAPS and 6-month mortality was demonstrated, with a hazard increase of 9.0% (95% CI 6.9% to 11.2%) for every point increase in GAPS. CONCLUSION: A higher GAPS is associated with increased hospital length of stay, 6-month hospital readmission and 6-month all-cause mortality. While GAPS’s primary application may be to predict admission and support clinical decision making, GAPS may provide valuable insight into inpatient resource allocation and bed planning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6701614
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67016142019-09-02 Multicentre, prospective observational study of the correlation between the Glasgow Admission Prediction Score and adverse outcomes Jones, Dominic Cameron, Allan Lowe, David J Mason, Suzanne M O'Keeffe, Colin A Logan, Eilidh BMJ Open Emergency Medicine OBJECTIVES: To assess whether the Glasgow Admission Prediction Score (GAPS) is correlated with hospital length of stay, 6-month hospital readmission and 6-month all-cause mortality. This study represents a 6-month follow-up of patients who were included in an external validation of the GAPS’ ability to predict admission at the point of triage. SETTING: Sampling was conducted between February and May 2016 at two separate emergency departments (EDs) in Sheffield and Glasgow. PARTICIPANTS: Data were collected prospectively at triage for consecutive adult patients who presented to the ED within sampling times. Any patients who avoided formal triage were excluded from the study. In total, 1420 patients were recruited. PRIMARY OUTCOMES: GAPS was calculated following triage and did not influence patient management. Length of hospital stay, hospital readmission and mortality against GAPS were modelled using survival analysis at 6 months. RESULTS: Of the 1420 patients recruited, 39.6% of these patients were initially admitted to hospital. At 6 months, 30.6% of patients had been readmitted and 5.6% of patients had died. For those admitted at first presentation, the chance of being discharged fell by 4.3% (95% CI 3.2% to 5.3%) per GAPS point increase. Cox regression indicated a 9.2% (95% CI 7.3% to 11.1%) increase in the chance of 6-month hospital readmission per point increase in GAPS. An association between GAPS and 6-month mortality was demonstrated, with a hazard increase of 9.0% (95% CI 6.9% to 11.2%) for every point increase in GAPS. CONCLUSION: A higher GAPS is associated with increased hospital length of stay, 6-month hospital readmission and 6-month all-cause mortality. While GAPS’s primary application may be to predict admission and support clinical decision making, GAPS may provide valuable insight into inpatient resource allocation and bed planning. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6701614/ /pubmed/31401591 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026599 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Emergency Medicine
Jones, Dominic
Cameron, Allan
Lowe, David J
Mason, Suzanne M
O'Keeffe, Colin A
Logan, Eilidh
Multicentre, prospective observational study of the correlation between the Glasgow Admission Prediction Score and adverse outcomes
title Multicentre, prospective observational study of the correlation between the Glasgow Admission Prediction Score and adverse outcomes
title_full Multicentre, prospective observational study of the correlation between the Glasgow Admission Prediction Score and adverse outcomes
title_fullStr Multicentre, prospective observational study of the correlation between the Glasgow Admission Prediction Score and adverse outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Multicentre, prospective observational study of the correlation between the Glasgow Admission Prediction Score and adverse outcomes
title_short Multicentre, prospective observational study of the correlation between the Glasgow Admission Prediction Score and adverse outcomes
title_sort multicentre, prospective observational study of the correlation between the glasgow admission prediction score and adverse outcomes
topic Emergency Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6701614/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31401591
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026599
work_keys_str_mv AT jonesdominic multicentreprospectiveobservationalstudyofthecorrelationbetweentheglasgowadmissionpredictionscoreandadverseoutcomes
AT cameronallan multicentreprospectiveobservationalstudyofthecorrelationbetweentheglasgowadmissionpredictionscoreandadverseoutcomes
AT lowedavidj multicentreprospectiveobservationalstudyofthecorrelationbetweentheglasgowadmissionpredictionscoreandadverseoutcomes
AT masonsuzannem multicentreprospectiveobservationalstudyofthecorrelationbetweentheglasgowadmissionpredictionscoreandadverseoutcomes
AT okeeffecolina multicentreprospectiveobservationalstudyofthecorrelationbetweentheglasgowadmissionpredictionscoreandadverseoutcomes
AT loganeilidh multicentreprospectiveobservationalstudyofthecorrelationbetweentheglasgowadmissionpredictionscoreandadverseoutcomes