Cargando…
RESTORE—Cognitive functional therapy with or without movement sensor biofeedback versus usual care for chronic, disabling low back pain: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
INTRODUCTION: Low back pain (LBP) is the leading cause of disability globally and its costs exceed those of cancer and diabetes combined. Recent evidence suggests that individualised cognitive and movement rehabilitation combined with lifestyle advice (cognitive functional therapy (CFT)) may produce...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6701662/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31427344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031133 |
_version_ | 1783445091450355712 |
---|---|
author | Kent, Peter O'Sullivan, P Smith, Anne Haines, Terry Campbell, Amity McGregor, Alison H Hartvigsen, Jan O'Sullivan, Kieran Vickery, Alistair Caneiro, JP Schütze, Robert Laird, Robert A Attwell, Stephanie Hancock, Mark |
author_facet | Kent, Peter O'Sullivan, P Smith, Anne Haines, Terry Campbell, Amity McGregor, Alison H Hartvigsen, Jan O'Sullivan, Kieran Vickery, Alistair Caneiro, JP Schütze, Robert Laird, Robert A Attwell, Stephanie Hancock, Mark |
author_sort | Kent, Peter |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Low back pain (LBP) is the leading cause of disability globally and its costs exceed those of cancer and diabetes combined. Recent evidence suggests that individualised cognitive and movement rehabilitation combined with lifestyle advice (cognitive functional therapy (CFT)) may produce larger and more sustained effects than traditional approaches, and movement sensor biofeedback may enhance outcomes. Therefore, this three-arm randomised controlled trial (RCT) aims to compare the clinical effectiveness and economic efficiency of individualised CFT delivered with or without movement sensor biofeedback, with usual care for patients with chronic, disabling LBP. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Pragmatic, three-arm, randomised, parallel group, superiority RCT comparing usual care (n=164) with CFT (n=164) and CFT-plus-movement-sensor-biofeedback (n=164). Inclusion criteria include: adults with a current episode of LBP >3 months; sought primary care ≥6 weeks ago for this episode of LBP; average LBP intensity of ≥4 (0–10 scale); at least moderate pain-related interference with work or daily activities. The CFT-only and CFT-plus-movement-sensor-biofeedback participants will receive seven treatment sessions over 12 weeks plus a ‘booster’ session at 26 weeks. All participants will be assessed at baseline, 3, 6, 13, 26, 40 and 52 weeks. The primary outcome is pain-related physical activity limitation (Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire). Linear mixed models will be used to assess the effect of treatment on physical activity limitation across all time points, with the primary comparison being a formal test of adjusted mean differences between groups at 13 weeks. For the economic (cost-utility) analysis, the primary outcome of clinical effect will be quality-adjusted life years measured across the 12-month follow-up using the EuroQol EQ-5D-5L. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approved by Curtin University Human Research Ethics Committee (HRE2018-0062, 6 Feb 2018). Study findings will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12618001396213). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6701662 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67016622019-09-02 RESTORE—Cognitive functional therapy with or without movement sensor biofeedback versus usual care for chronic, disabling low back pain: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial Kent, Peter O'Sullivan, P Smith, Anne Haines, Terry Campbell, Amity McGregor, Alison H Hartvigsen, Jan O'Sullivan, Kieran Vickery, Alistair Caneiro, JP Schütze, Robert Laird, Robert A Attwell, Stephanie Hancock, Mark BMJ Open Rehabilitation Medicine INTRODUCTION: Low back pain (LBP) is the leading cause of disability globally and its costs exceed those of cancer and diabetes combined. Recent evidence suggests that individualised cognitive and movement rehabilitation combined with lifestyle advice (cognitive functional therapy (CFT)) may produce larger and more sustained effects than traditional approaches, and movement sensor biofeedback may enhance outcomes. Therefore, this three-arm randomised controlled trial (RCT) aims to compare the clinical effectiveness and economic efficiency of individualised CFT delivered with or without movement sensor biofeedback, with usual care for patients with chronic, disabling LBP. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Pragmatic, three-arm, randomised, parallel group, superiority RCT comparing usual care (n=164) with CFT (n=164) and CFT-plus-movement-sensor-biofeedback (n=164). Inclusion criteria include: adults with a current episode of LBP >3 months; sought primary care ≥6 weeks ago for this episode of LBP; average LBP intensity of ≥4 (0–10 scale); at least moderate pain-related interference with work or daily activities. The CFT-only and CFT-plus-movement-sensor-biofeedback participants will receive seven treatment sessions over 12 weeks plus a ‘booster’ session at 26 weeks. All participants will be assessed at baseline, 3, 6, 13, 26, 40 and 52 weeks. The primary outcome is pain-related physical activity limitation (Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire). Linear mixed models will be used to assess the effect of treatment on physical activity limitation across all time points, with the primary comparison being a formal test of adjusted mean differences between groups at 13 weeks. For the economic (cost-utility) analysis, the primary outcome of clinical effect will be quality-adjusted life years measured across the 12-month follow-up using the EuroQol EQ-5D-5L. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approved by Curtin University Human Research Ethics Committee (HRE2018-0062, 6 Feb 2018). Study findings will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12618001396213). BMJ Publishing Group 2019-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6701662/ /pubmed/31427344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031133 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Rehabilitation Medicine Kent, Peter O'Sullivan, P Smith, Anne Haines, Terry Campbell, Amity McGregor, Alison H Hartvigsen, Jan O'Sullivan, Kieran Vickery, Alistair Caneiro, JP Schütze, Robert Laird, Robert A Attwell, Stephanie Hancock, Mark RESTORE—Cognitive functional therapy with or without movement sensor biofeedback versus usual care for chronic, disabling low back pain: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title | RESTORE—Cognitive functional therapy with or without movement sensor biofeedback versus usual care for chronic, disabling low back pain: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_full | RESTORE—Cognitive functional therapy with or without movement sensor biofeedback versus usual care for chronic, disabling low back pain: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | RESTORE—Cognitive functional therapy with or without movement sensor biofeedback versus usual care for chronic, disabling low back pain: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | RESTORE—Cognitive functional therapy with or without movement sensor biofeedback versus usual care for chronic, disabling low back pain: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_short | RESTORE—Cognitive functional therapy with or without movement sensor biofeedback versus usual care for chronic, disabling low back pain: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | restore—cognitive functional therapy with or without movement sensor biofeedback versus usual care for chronic, disabling low back pain: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
topic | Rehabilitation Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6701662/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31427344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031133 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kentpeter restorecognitivefunctionaltherapywithorwithoutmovementsensorbiofeedbackversususualcareforchronicdisablinglowbackpainstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT osullivanp restorecognitivefunctionaltherapywithorwithoutmovementsensorbiofeedbackversususualcareforchronicdisablinglowbackpainstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT smithanne restorecognitivefunctionaltherapywithorwithoutmovementsensorbiofeedbackversususualcareforchronicdisablinglowbackpainstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT hainesterry restorecognitivefunctionaltherapywithorwithoutmovementsensorbiofeedbackversususualcareforchronicdisablinglowbackpainstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT campbellamity restorecognitivefunctionaltherapywithorwithoutmovementsensorbiofeedbackversususualcareforchronicdisablinglowbackpainstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT mcgregoralisonh restorecognitivefunctionaltherapywithorwithoutmovementsensorbiofeedbackversususualcareforchronicdisablinglowbackpainstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT hartvigsenjan restorecognitivefunctionaltherapywithorwithoutmovementsensorbiofeedbackversususualcareforchronicdisablinglowbackpainstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT osullivankieran restorecognitivefunctionaltherapywithorwithoutmovementsensorbiofeedbackversususualcareforchronicdisablinglowbackpainstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT vickeryalistair restorecognitivefunctionaltherapywithorwithoutmovementsensorbiofeedbackversususualcareforchronicdisablinglowbackpainstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT caneirojp restorecognitivefunctionaltherapywithorwithoutmovementsensorbiofeedbackversususualcareforchronicdisablinglowbackpainstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT schutzerobert restorecognitivefunctionaltherapywithorwithoutmovementsensorbiofeedbackversususualcareforchronicdisablinglowbackpainstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT lairdroberta restorecognitivefunctionaltherapywithorwithoutmovementsensorbiofeedbackversususualcareforchronicdisablinglowbackpainstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT attwellstephanie restorecognitivefunctionaltherapywithorwithoutmovementsensorbiofeedbackversususualcareforchronicdisablinglowbackpainstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT hancockmark restorecognitivefunctionaltherapywithorwithoutmovementsensorbiofeedbackversususualcareforchronicdisablinglowbackpainstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial |