Cargando…

RESTORE—Cognitive functional therapy with or without movement sensor biofeedback versus usual care for chronic, disabling low back pain: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION: Low back pain (LBP) is the leading cause of disability globally and its costs exceed those of cancer and diabetes combined. Recent evidence suggests that individualised cognitive and movement rehabilitation combined with lifestyle advice (cognitive functional therapy (CFT)) may produce...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kent, Peter, O'Sullivan, P, Smith, Anne, Haines, Terry, Campbell, Amity, McGregor, Alison H, Hartvigsen, Jan, O'Sullivan, Kieran, Vickery, Alistair, Caneiro, JP, Schütze, Robert, Laird, Robert A, Attwell, Stephanie, Hancock, Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6701662/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31427344
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031133
_version_ 1783445091450355712
author Kent, Peter
O'Sullivan, P
Smith, Anne
Haines, Terry
Campbell, Amity
McGregor, Alison H
Hartvigsen, Jan
O'Sullivan, Kieran
Vickery, Alistair
Caneiro, JP
Schütze, Robert
Laird, Robert A
Attwell, Stephanie
Hancock, Mark
author_facet Kent, Peter
O'Sullivan, P
Smith, Anne
Haines, Terry
Campbell, Amity
McGregor, Alison H
Hartvigsen, Jan
O'Sullivan, Kieran
Vickery, Alistair
Caneiro, JP
Schütze, Robert
Laird, Robert A
Attwell, Stephanie
Hancock, Mark
author_sort Kent, Peter
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Low back pain (LBP) is the leading cause of disability globally and its costs exceed those of cancer and diabetes combined. Recent evidence suggests that individualised cognitive and movement rehabilitation combined with lifestyle advice (cognitive functional therapy (CFT)) may produce larger and more sustained effects than traditional approaches, and movement sensor biofeedback may enhance outcomes. Therefore, this three-arm randomised controlled trial (RCT) aims to compare the clinical effectiveness and economic efficiency of individualised CFT delivered with or without movement sensor biofeedback, with usual care for patients with chronic, disabling LBP. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Pragmatic, three-arm, randomised, parallel group, superiority RCT comparing usual care (n=164) with CFT (n=164) and CFT-plus-movement-sensor-biofeedback (n=164). Inclusion criteria include: adults with a current episode of LBP >3 months; sought primary care ≥6 weeks ago for this episode of LBP; average LBP intensity of ≥4 (0–10 scale); at least moderate pain-related interference with work or daily activities. The CFT-only and CFT-plus-movement-sensor-biofeedback participants will receive seven treatment sessions over 12 weeks plus a ‘booster’ session at 26 weeks. All participants will be assessed at baseline, 3, 6, 13, 26, 40 and 52 weeks. The primary outcome is pain-related physical activity limitation (Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire). Linear mixed models will be used to assess the effect of treatment on physical activity limitation across all time points, with the primary comparison being a formal test of adjusted mean differences between groups at 13 weeks. For the economic (cost-utility) analysis, the primary outcome of clinical effect will be quality-adjusted life years measured across the 12-month follow-up using the EuroQol EQ-5D-5L. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approved by Curtin University Human Research Ethics Committee (HRE2018-0062, 6 Feb 2018). Study findings will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12618001396213).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6701662
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67016622019-09-02 RESTORE—Cognitive functional therapy with or without movement sensor biofeedback versus usual care for chronic, disabling low back pain: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial Kent, Peter O'Sullivan, P Smith, Anne Haines, Terry Campbell, Amity McGregor, Alison H Hartvigsen, Jan O'Sullivan, Kieran Vickery, Alistair Caneiro, JP Schütze, Robert Laird, Robert A Attwell, Stephanie Hancock, Mark BMJ Open Rehabilitation Medicine INTRODUCTION: Low back pain (LBP) is the leading cause of disability globally and its costs exceed those of cancer and diabetes combined. Recent evidence suggests that individualised cognitive and movement rehabilitation combined with lifestyle advice (cognitive functional therapy (CFT)) may produce larger and more sustained effects than traditional approaches, and movement sensor biofeedback may enhance outcomes. Therefore, this three-arm randomised controlled trial (RCT) aims to compare the clinical effectiveness and economic efficiency of individualised CFT delivered with or without movement sensor biofeedback, with usual care for patients with chronic, disabling LBP. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Pragmatic, three-arm, randomised, parallel group, superiority RCT comparing usual care (n=164) with CFT (n=164) and CFT-plus-movement-sensor-biofeedback (n=164). Inclusion criteria include: adults with a current episode of LBP >3 months; sought primary care ≥6 weeks ago for this episode of LBP; average LBP intensity of ≥4 (0–10 scale); at least moderate pain-related interference with work or daily activities. The CFT-only and CFT-plus-movement-sensor-biofeedback participants will receive seven treatment sessions over 12 weeks plus a ‘booster’ session at 26 weeks. All participants will be assessed at baseline, 3, 6, 13, 26, 40 and 52 weeks. The primary outcome is pain-related physical activity limitation (Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire). Linear mixed models will be used to assess the effect of treatment on physical activity limitation across all time points, with the primary comparison being a formal test of adjusted mean differences between groups at 13 weeks. For the economic (cost-utility) analysis, the primary outcome of clinical effect will be quality-adjusted life years measured across the 12-month follow-up using the EuroQol EQ-5D-5L. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approved by Curtin University Human Research Ethics Committee (HRE2018-0062, 6 Feb 2018). Study findings will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12618001396213). BMJ Publishing Group 2019-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6701662/ /pubmed/31427344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031133 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Rehabilitation Medicine
Kent, Peter
O'Sullivan, P
Smith, Anne
Haines, Terry
Campbell, Amity
McGregor, Alison H
Hartvigsen, Jan
O'Sullivan, Kieran
Vickery, Alistair
Caneiro, JP
Schütze, Robert
Laird, Robert A
Attwell, Stephanie
Hancock, Mark
RESTORE—Cognitive functional therapy with or without movement sensor biofeedback versus usual care for chronic, disabling low back pain: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title RESTORE—Cognitive functional therapy with or without movement sensor biofeedback versus usual care for chronic, disabling low back pain: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full RESTORE—Cognitive functional therapy with or without movement sensor biofeedback versus usual care for chronic, disabling low back pain: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr RESTORE—Cognitive functional therapy with or without movement sensor biofeedback versus usual care for chronic, disabling low back pain: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed RESTORE—Cognitive functional therapy with or without movement sensor biofeedback versus usual care for chronic, disabling low back pain: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_short RESTORE—Cognitive functional therapy with or without movement sensor biofeedback versus usual care for chronic, disabling low back pain: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_sort restore—cognitive functional therapy with or without movement sensor biofeedback versus usual care for chronic, disabling low back pain: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
topic Rehabilitation Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6701662/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31427344
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031133
work_keys_str_mv AT kentpeter restorecognitivefunctionaltherapywithorwithoutmovementsensorbiofeedbackversususualcareforchronicdisablinglowbackpainstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT osullivanp restorecognitivefunctionaltherapywithorwithoutmovementsensorbiofeedbackversususualcareforchronicdisablinglowbackpainstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT smithanne restorecognitivefunctionaltherapywithorwithoutmovementsensorbiofeedbackversususualcareforchronicdisablinglowbackpainstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hainesterry restorecognitivefunctionaltherapywithorwithoutmovementsensorbiofeedbackversususualcareforchronicdisablinglowbackpainstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT campbellamity restorecognitivefunctionaltherapywithorwithoutmovementsensorbiofeedbackversususualcareforchronicdisablinglowbackpainstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mcgregoralisonh restorecognitivefunctionaltherapywithorwithoutmovementsensorbiofeedbackversususualcareforchronicdisablinglowbackpainstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hartvigsenjan restorecognitivefunctionaltherapywithorwithoutmovementsensorbiofeedbackversususualcareforchronicdisablinglowbackpainstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT osullivankieran restorecognitivefunctionaltherapywithorwithoutmovementsensorbiofeedbackversususualcareforchronicdisablinglowbackpainstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT vickeryalistair restorecognitivefunctionaltherapywithorwithoutmovementsensorbiofeedbackversususualcareforchronicdisablinglowbackpainstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT caneirojp restorecognitivefunctionaltherapywithorwithoutmovementsensorbiofeedbackversususualcareforchronicdisablinglowbackpainstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT schutzerobert restorecognitivefunctionaltherapywithorwithoutmovementsensorbiofeedbackversususualcareforchronicdisablinglowbackpainstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT lairdroberta restorecognitivefunctionaltherapywithorwithoutmovementsensorbiofeedbackversususualcareforchronicdisablinglowbackpainstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT attwellstephanie restorecognitivefunctionaltherapywithorwithoutmovementsensorbiofeedbackversususualcareforchronicdisablinglowbackpainstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hancockmark restorecognitivefunctionaltherapywithorwithoutmovementsensorbiofeedbackversususualcareforchronicdisablinglowbackpainstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial