Cargando…

Intensity-modulated carbon-ion radiation therapy versus intensity-modulated photon-based radiation therapy in locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a dosimetric comparison

PURPOSE: To identify the specific dose advantage of intensity-modulated carbon-ion radiation therapy (IMCT) over photon-based intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in the treatment of locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients with locally recurrent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Lei, Hu, Jiyi, Liu, Xiaoli, Wang, Weiwei, Kong, Lin, Lu, Jiade J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6701671/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31496819
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S205421
_version_ 1783445093652365312
author Wang, Lei
Hu, Jiyi
Liu, Xiaoli
Wang, Weiwei
Kong, Lin
Lu, Jiade J
author_facet Wang, Lei
Hu, Jiyi
Liu, Xiaoli
Wang, Weiwei
Kong, Lin
Lu, Jiade J
author_sort Wang, Lei
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To identify the specific dose advantage of intensity-modulated carbon-ion radiation therapy (IMCT) over photon-based intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in the treatment of locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients with locally recurrent NPC underwent IMCT and IMRT planning. Target definition followed the recommendations of the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU) reports no. 50, 62 and 83. The real treatment plans which were delivered to patients were designed on the Siemens Syngo planning system while the control plans for dosimetric comparison were generated from the Varian Medical Systems. The optimization constraints of the two designs were basically the same. Target coverage was evaluated using the following parameters: Dmin, Dmax, D1, D2, D50, D95, D98 and D99. Target dose distribution and conformality were evaluated using the homogeneity index and conformity index. Normal tissue sparing of organs at risk (OARs) were evaluated using Dmean, D1 and Dmax. SPSS 22.0 software was used for data analysis. RESULTS: Both IMCT and IMRT plans met clinical prescription dose requirements. Target coverage of D1, D2, D50, D95, D98, D99 were not significantly different between the two plans (P>0.05). The two plans showed satisfactory coverage of the target without significant difference. There was no significant difference in terms of the homogeneity and conformability between the two plans. Dosimetric parameters for the brain stem, spinal cord, parotid gland, optic chiasm, eyeball, lens, temporal lobe and inner ear were significantly reduced in the IMCT plan (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: As compared with photon-based IMRT, IMCT significantly reduces radiation dose to the OARs in the treatment of locally recurrent NPC while maintaining the dose coverage to the target volumes. Such a feature is particularly important for patients who experienced previous high-dose irradiation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6701671
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67016712019-09-06 Intensity-modulated carbon-ion radiation therapy versus intensity-modulated photon-based radiation therapy in locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a dosimetric comparison Wang, Lei Hu, Jiyi Liu, Xiaoli Wang, Weiwei Kong, Lin Lu, Jiade J Cancer Manag Res Original Research PURPOSE: To identify the specific dose advantage of intensity-modulated carbon-ion radiation therapy (IMCT) over photon-based intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in the treatment of locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients with locally recurrent NPC underwent IMCT and IMRT planning. Target definition followed the recommendations of the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU) reports no. 50, 62 and 83. The real treatment plans which were delivered to patients were designed on the Siemens Syngo planning system while the control plans for dosimetric comparison were generated from the Varian Medical Systems. The optimization constraints of the two designs were basically the same. Target coverage was evaluated using the following parameters: Dmin, Dmax, D1, D2, D50, D95, D98 and D99. Target dose distribution and conformality were evaluated using the homogeneity index and conformity index. Normal tissue sparing of organs at risk (OARs) were evaluated using Dmean, D1 and Dmax. SPSS 22.0 software was used for data analysis. RESULTS: Both IMCT and IMRT plans met clinical prescription dose requirements. Target coverage of D1, D2, D50, D95, D98, D99 were not significantly different between the two plans (P>0.05). The two plans showed satisfactory coverage of the target without significant difference. There was no significant difference in terms of the homogeneity and conformability between the two plans. Dosimetric parameters for the brain stem, spinal cord, parotid gland, optic chiasm, eyeball, lens, temporal lobe and inner ear were significantly reduced in the IMCT plan (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: As compared with photon-based IMRT, IMCT significantly reduces radiation dose to the OARs in the treatment of locally recurrent NPC while maintaining the dose coverage to the target volumes. Such a feature is particularly important for patients who experienced previous high-dose irradiation. Dove 2019-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6701671/ /pubmed/31496819 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S205421 Text en © 2019 Wang et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Wang, Lei
Hu, Jiyi
Liu, Xiaoli
Wang, Weiwei
Kong, Lin
Lu, Jiade J
Intensity-modulated carbon-ion radiation therapy versus intensity-modulated photon-based radiation therapy in locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a dosimetric comparison
title Intensity-modulated carbon-ion radiation therapy versus intensity-modulated photon-based radiation therapy in locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a dosimetric comparison
title_full Intensity-modulated carbon-ion radiation therapy versus intensity-modulated photon-based radiation therapy in locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a dosimetric comparison
title_fullStr Intensity-modulated carbon-ion radiation therapy versus intensity-modulated photon-based radiation therapy in locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a dosimetric comparison
title_full_unstemmed Intensity-modulated carbon-ion radiation therapy versus intensity-modulated photon-based radiation therapy in locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a dosimetric comparison
title_short Intensity-modulated carbon-ion radiation therapy versus intensity-modulated photon-based radiation therapy in locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a dosimetric comparison
title_sort intensity-modulated carbon-ion radiation therapy versus intensity-modulated photon-based radiation therapy in locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a dosimetric comparison
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6701671/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31496819
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S205421
work_keys_str_mv AT wanglei intensitymodulatedcarbonionradiationtherapyversusintensitymodulatedphotonbasedradiationtherapyinlocallyrecurrentnasopharyngealcarcinomaadosimetriccomparison
AT hujiyi intensitymodulatedcarbonionradiationtherapyversusintensitymodulatedphotonbasedradiationtherapyinlocallyrecurrentnasopharyngealcarcinomaadosimetriccomparison
AT liuxiaoli intensitymodulatedcarbonionradiationtherapyversusintensitymodulatedphotonbasedradiationtherapyinlocallyrecurrentnasopharyngealcarcinomaadosimetriccomparison
AT wangweiwei intensitymodulatedcarbonionradiationtherapyversusintensitymodulatedphotonbasedradiationtherapyinlocallyrecurrentnasopharyngealcarcinomaadosimetriccomparison
AT konglin intensitymodulatedcarbonionradiationtherapyversusintensitymodulatedphotonbasedradiationtherapyinlocallyrecurrentnasopharyngealcarcinomaadosimetriccomparison
AT lujiadej intensitymodulatedcarbonionradiationtherapyversusintensitymodulatedphotonbasedradiationtherapyinlocallyrecurrentnasopharyngealcarcinomaadosimetriccomparison