Cargando…
Vision with different presbyopia corrections simulated with a portable binocular visual simulator
Presbyopes can choose today among different corrections to provide them with functional vision at far and near, and the outcomes and patient satisfaction depend on the selection. In this study, we present a binocular and portable vision simulator, based on temporal multiplexing of two synchronized t...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6701771/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31430328 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221144 |
_version_ | 1783445107423313920 |
---|---|
author | Radhakrishnan, Aiswaryah Pascual, Daniel Marcos, Susana Dorronsoro, Carlos |
author_facet | Radhakrishnan, Aiswaryah Pascual, Daniel Marcos, Susana Dorronsoro, Carlos |
author_sort | Radhakrishnan, Aiswaryah |
collection | PubMed |
description | Presbyopes can choose today among different corrections to provide them with functional vision at far and near, and the outcomes and patient satisfaction depend on the selection. In this study, we present a binocular and portable vision simulator, based on temporal multiplexing of two synchronized tunable lenses allowing see-through and programmable visual simulations of presbyopic corrections. Seventeen binocular corrections were tested: 3 Monofocal (Far, Intermediate, Near), 4 Simultaneous Vision (bifocal, trifocal), 2 Monovision (far and near in either eye) and 8 Modified Monovision corrections (Simultaneous vision in one eye, Monofocal in the other eye). Perceived visual quality was assessed through the simulated corrections in 8 cyclopleged subjects who viewed a composite realistic visual scene with high contrast letters and a landscape at far (4 m) and a high contrast text at intermediate (66 cm) and near (33 cm) distances. Perceptual scores were obtained on a scale of 0 to 5 (low to high perceived quality). Perceptual preference was assessed by judging 36 random image pairs (6 repetitions) viewed through 9 binocular presbyopic corrections using two-interval forced choice procedures. The average score, across far and near distances, was the highest for Monovision (4.4±0.3), followed by Modified Monovision (3.4±0.1), Simultaneous Vision (3.0±0.1) and Monofocal corrections (2.9±0.2). However, the mean difference between far and near was lower for Simultaneous Vision and Monovision (0.4±0.1 PS) than Modified Monovision (1.8±0.7) or monofocal corrections (3.3±1.5). A strong significant correlation was found between the perceptual scores and the percentages of energy in focus, for each correction and distance (R = 0.64, p<0.0001). Multivariate ANOVA revealed significant influence of observation distances (p<10–9) and patients (p = 0.01) on Perceptual Score. In conclusion, we have developed a binocular portable vision simulator that can simulate rapidly and non-invasively different combinations of presbyopic corrections. This tool has applications in systematic clinical evaluation of presbyopia corrections. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6701771 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67017712019-09-04 Vision with different presbyopia corrections simulated with a portable binocular visual simulator Radhakrishnan, Aiswaryah Pascual, Daniel Marcos, Susana Dorronsoro, Carlos PLoS One Research Article Presbyopes can choose today among different corrections to provide them with functional vision at far and near, and the outcomes and patient satisfaction depend on the selection. In this study, we present a binocular and portable vision simulator, based on temporal multiplexing of two synchronized tunable lenses allowing see-through and programmable visual simulations of presbyopic corrections. Seventeen binocular corrections were tested: 3 Monofocal (Far, Intermediate, Near), 4 Simultaneous Vision (bifocal, trifocal), 2 Monovision (far and near in either eye) and 8 Modified Monovision corrections (Simultaneous vision in one eye, Monofocal in the other eye). Perceived visual quality was assessed through the simulated corrections in 8 cyclopleged subjects who viewed a composite realistic visual scene with high contrast letters and a landscape at far (4 m) and a high contrast text at intermediate (66 cm) and near (33 cm) distances. Perceptual scores were obtained on a scale of 0 to 5 (low to high perceived quality). Perceptual preference was assessed by judging 36 random image pairs (6 repetitions) viewed through 9 binocular presbyopic corrections using two-interval forced choice procedures. The average score, across far and near distances, was the highest for Monovision (4.4±0.3), followed by Modified Monovision (3.4±0.1), Simultaneous Vision (3.0±0.1) and Monofocal corrections (2.9±0.2). However, the mean difference between far and near was lower for Simultaneous Vision and Monovision (0.4±0.1 PS) than Modified Monovision (1.8±0.7) or monofocal corrections (3.3±1.5). A strong significant correlation was found between the perceptual scores and the percentages of energy in focus, for each correction and distance (R = 0.64, p<0.0001). Multivariate ANOVA revealed significant influence of observation distances (p<10–9) and patients (p = 0.01) on Perceptual Score. In conclusion, we have developed a binocular portable vision simulator that can simulate rapidly and non-invasively different combinations of presbyopic corrections. This tool has applications in systematic clinical evaluation of presbyopia corrections. Public Library of Science 2019-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6701771/ /pubmed/31430328 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221144 Text en © 2019 Radhakrishnan et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Radhakrishnan, Aiswaryah Pascual, Daniel Marcos, Susana Dorronsoro, Carlos Vision with different presbyopia corrections simulated with a portable binocular visual simulator |
title | Vision with different presbyopia corrections simulated with a portable binocular visual simulator |
title_full | Vision with different presbyopia corrections simulated with a portable binocular visual simulator |
title_fullStr | Vision with different presbyopia corrections simulated with a portable binocular visual simulator |
title_full_unstemmed | Vision with different presbyopia corrections simulated with a portable binocular visual simulator |
title_short | Vision with different presbyopia corrections simulated with a portable binocular visual simulator |
title_sort | vision with different presbyopia corrections simulated with a portable binocular visual simulator |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6701771/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31430328 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221144 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT radhakrishnanaiswaryah visionwithdifferentpresbyopiacorrectionssimulatedwithaportablebinocularvisualsimulator AT pascualdaniel visionwithdifferentpresbyopiacorrectionssimulatedwithaportablebinocularvisualsimulator AT marcossusana visionwithdifferentpresbyopiacorrectionssimulatedwithaportablebinocularvisualsimulator AT dorronsorocarlos visionwithdifferentpresbyopiacorrectionssimulatedwithaportablebinocularvisualsimulator |