Cargando…

Public preferences for corporate social responsibility activities in the pharmaceutical industry: Empirical evidence from Korea

Although corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities are common in the pharmaceutical industry, there is little empirical evidence on consumer responses to CSR practices. We investigated public awareness, preferences, and expectations regarding social contribution of the pharmaceutical industry...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Hankil, Kim, Sang Yong, Kim, Goun, Kang, Hye-Young
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6701779/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31430330
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221321
_version_ 1783445109414559744
author Lee, Hankil
Kim, Sang Yong
Kim, Goun
Kang, Hye-Young
author_facet Lee, Hankil
Kim, Sang Yong
Kim, Goun
Kang, Hye-Young
author_sort Lee, Hankil
collection PubMed
description Although corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities are common in the pharmaceutical industry, there is little empirical evidence on consumer responses to CSR practices. We investigated public awareness, preferences, and expectations regarding social contribution of the pharmaceutical industry’s CSR activities, and identified the factors associated with such activities. We conducted an online survey with 1,298 respondents comprising two groups: healthy individuals (546) and patients (752). Most respondents (78%) expressed interest in CSR activities undertaken by pharmaceutical companies. However, they reported a lack of awareness and experience thereof; only 26.9% were aware of and 7.9% had experience with such activities. Among our six CSR activity categories, both survey groups showed the highest preference for the “promoting public health” (healthy group: 6.34/10; patient group: 6.37/10) and “emergency disaster relief support” (6.31 and 6.35) categories. Among sub-categories, activities related to “development of innovative drugs in untreated areas” (6.63 and 6.82) and “support for research on new drug development” (6.59 and 6.84) received the highest scores. The mean expectation score of social contribution of all CSR activities was slightly higher than the mean preference score (6.37 and 6.06, respectively). The patient group exhibited a larger difference between the highest and lowest expectation scores than the healthy group (1.11 and 0.64, respectively). The results of the regression analysis revealed that being a patient, being male, and having positive attitudes toward CSR and its expected effects significantly and positively affected public preferences regarding CSR activities. We can conclude that CSR activities with high public preference might be an effective strategy to improve public awareness of the pharmaceutical industry’s CSR activities. Furthermore, the highest preference for CSR activities relates to new drug development, indicating that our society believes the pharmaceutical industry’s key CSR activity should be to pursue its intrinsic mission: to fulfill unmet medical needs by developing new drugs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6701779
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67017792019-09-04 Public preferences for corporate social responsibility activities in the pharmaceutical industry: Empirical evidence from Korea Lee, Hankil Kim, Sang Yong Kim, Goun Kang, Hye-Young PLoS One Research Article Although corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities are common in the pharmaceutical industry, there is little empirical evidence on consumer responses to CSR practices. We investigated public awareness, preferences, and expectations regarding social contribution of the pharmaceutical industry’s CSR activities, and identified the factors associated with such activities. We conducted an online survey with 1,298 respondents comprising two groups: healthy individuals (546) and patients (752). Most respondents (78%) expressed interest in CSR activities undertaken by pharmaceutical companies. However, they reported a lack of awareness and experience thereof; only 26.9% were aware of and 7.9% had experience with such activities. Among our six CSR activity categories, both survey groups showed the highest preference for the “promoting public health” (healthy group: 6.34/10; patient group: 6.37/10) and “emergency disaster relief support” (6.31 and 6.35) categories. Among sub-categories, activities related to “development of innovative drugs in untreated areas” (6.63 and 6.82) and “support for research on new drug development” (6.59 and 6.84) received the highest scores. The mean expectation score of social contribution of all CSR activities was slightly higher than the mean preference score (6.37 and 6.06, respectively). The patient group exhibited a larger difference between the highest and lowest expectation scores than the healthy group (1.11 and 0.64, respectively). The results of the regression analysis revealed that being a patient, being male, and having positive attitudes toward CSR and its expected effects significantly and positively affected public preferences regarding CSR activities. We can conclude that CSR activities with high public preference might be an effective strategy to improve public awareness of the pharmaceutical industry’s CSR activities. Furthermore, the highest preference for CSR activities relates to new drug development, indicating that our society believes the pharmaceutical industry’s key CSR activity should be to pursue its intrinsic mission: to fulfill unmet medical needs by developing new drugs. Public Library of Science 2019-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6701779/ /pubmed/31430330 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221321 Text en © 2019 Lee et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lee, Hankil
Kim, Sang Yong
Kim, Goun
Kang, Hye-Young
Public preferences for corporate social responsibility activities in the pharmaceutical industry: Empirical evidence from Korea
title Public preferences for corporate social responsibility activities in the pharmaceutical industry: Empirical evidence from Korea
title_full Public preferences for corporate social responsibility activities in the pharmaceutical industry: Empirical evidence from Korea
title_fullStr Public preferences for corporate social responsibility activities in the pharmaceutical industry: Empirical evidence from Korea
title_full_unstemmed Public preferences for corporate social responsibility activities in the pharmaceutical industry: Empirical evidence from Korea
title_short Public preferences for corporate social responsibility activities in the pharmaceutical industry: Empirical evidence from Korea
title_sort public preferences for corporate social responsibility activities in the pharmaceutical industry: empirical evidence from korea
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6701779/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31430330
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221321
work_keys_str_mv AT leehankil publicpreferencesforcorporatesocialresponsibilityactivitiesinthepharmaceuticalindustryempiricalevidencefromkorea
AT kimsangyong publicpreferencesforcorporatesocialresponsibilityactivitiesinthepharmaceuticalindustryempiricalevidencefromkorea
AT kimgoun publicpreferencesforcorporatesocialresponsibilityactivitiesinthepharmaceuticalindustryempiricalevidencefromkorea
AT kanghyeyoung publicpreferencesforcorporatesocialresponsibilityactivitiesinthepharmaceuticalindustryempiricalevidencefromkorea