Cargando…
Public preferences for corporate social responsibility activities in the pharmaceutical industry: Empirical evidence from Korea
Although corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities are common in the pharmaceutical industry, there is little empirical evidence on consumer responses to CSR practices. We investigated public awareness, preferences, and expectations regarding social contribution of the pharmaceutical industry...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6701779/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31430330 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221321 |
_version_ | 1783445109414559744 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Hankil Kim, Sang Yong Kim, Goun Kang, Hye-Young |
author_facet | Lee, Hankil Kim, Sang Yong Kim, Goun Kang, Hye-Young |
author_sort | Lee, Hankil |
collection | PubMed |
description | Although corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities are common in the pharmaceutical industry, there is little empirical evidence on consumer responses to CSR practices. We investigated public awareness, preferences, and expectations regarding social contribution of the pharmaceutical industry’s CSR activities, and identified the factors associated with such activities. We conducted an online survey with 1,298 respondents comprising two groups: healthy individuals (546) and patients (752). Most respondents (78%) expressed interest in CSR activities undertaken by pharmaceutical companies. However, they reported a lack of awareness and experience thereof; only 26.9% were aware of and 7.9% had experience with such activities. Among our six CSR activity categories, both survey groups showed the highest preference for the “promoting public health” (healthy group: 6.34/10; patient group: 6.37/10) and “emergency disaster relief support” (6.31 and 6.35) categories. Among sub-categories, activities related to “development of innovative drugs in untreated areas” (6.63 and 6.82) and “support for research on new drug development” (6.59 and 6.84) received the highest scores. The mean expectation score of social contribution of all CSR activities was slightly higher than the mean preference score (6.37 and 6.06, respectively). The patient group exhibited a larger difference between the highest and lowest expectation scores than the healthy group (1.11 and 0.64, respectively). The results of the regression analysis revealed that being a patient, being male, and having positive attitudes toward CSR and its expected effects significantly and positively affected public preferences regarding CSR activities. We can conclude that CSR activities with high public preference might be an effective strategy to improve public awareness of the pharmaceutical industry’s CSR activities. Furthermore, the highest preference for CSR activities relates to new drug development, indicating that our society believes the pharmaceutical industry’s key CSR activity should be to pursue its intrinsic mission: to fulfill unmet medical needs by developing new drugs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6701779 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67017792019-09-04 Public preferences for corporate social responsibility activities in the pharmaceutical industry: Empirical evidence from Korea Lee, Hankil Kim, Sang Yong Kim, Goun Kang, Hye-Young PLoS One Research Article Although corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities are common in the pharmaceutical industry, there is little empirical evidence on consumer responses to CSR practices. We investigated public awareness, preferences, and expectations regarding social contribution of the pharmaceutical industry’s CSR activities, and identified the factors associated with such activities. We conducted an online survey with 1,298 respondents comprising two groups: healthy individuals (546) and patients (752). Most respondents (78%) expressed interest in CSR activities undertaken by pharmaceutical companies. However, they reported a lack of awareness and experience thereof; only 26.9% were aware of and 7.9% had experience with such activities. Among our six CSR activity categories, both survey groups showed the highest preference for the “promoting public health” (healthy group: 6.34/10; patient group: 6.37/10) and “emergency disaster relief support” (6.31 and 6.35) categories. Among sub-categories, activities related to “development of innovative drugs in untreated areas” (6.63 and 6.82) and “support for research on new drug development” (6.59 and 6.84) received the highest scores. The mean expectation score of social contribution of all CSR activities was slightly higher than the mean preference score (6.37 and 6.06, respectively). The patient group exhibited a larger difference between the highest and lowest expectation scores than the healthy group (1.11 and 0.64, respectively). The results of the regression analysis revealed that being a patient, being male, and having positive attitudes toward CSR and its expected effects significantly and positively affected public preferences regarding CSR activities. We can conclude that CSR activities with high public preference might be an effective strategy to improve public awareness of the pharmaceutical industry’s CSR activities. Furthermore, the highest preference for CSR activities relates to new drug development, indicating that our society believes the pharmaceutical industry’s key CSR activity should be to pursue its intrinsic mission: to fulfill unmet medical needs by developing new drugs. Public Library of Science 2019-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6701779/ /pubmed/31430330 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221321 Text en © 2019 Lee et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lee, Hankil Kim, Sang Yong Kim, Goun Kang, Hye-Young Public preferences for corporate social responsibility activities in the pharmaceutical industry: Empirical evidence from Korea |
title | Public preferences for corporate social responsibility activities in the pharmaceutical industry: Empirical evidence from Korea |
title_full | Public preferences for corporate social responsibility activities in the pharmaceutical industry: Empirical evidence from Korea |
title_fullStr | Public preferences for corporate social responsibility activities in the pharmaceutical industry: Empirical evidence from Korea |
title_full_unstemmed | Public preferences for corporate social responsibility activities in the pharmaceutical industry: Empirical evidence from Korea |
title_short | Public preferences for corporate social responsibility activities in the pharmaceutical industry: Empirical evidence from Korea |
title_sort | public preferences for corporate social responsibility activities in the pharmaceutical industry: empirical evidence from korea |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6701779/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31430330 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221321 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leehankil publicpreferencesforcorporatesocialresponsibilityactivitiesinthepharmaceuticalindustryempiricalevidencefromkorea AT kimsangyong publicpreferencesforcorporatesocialresponsibilityactivitiesinthepharmaceuticalindustryempiricalevidencefromkorea AT kimgoun publicpreferencesforcorporatesocialresponsibilityactivitiesinthepharmaceuticalindustryempiricalevidencefromkorea AT kanghyeyoung publicpreferencesforcorporatesocialresponsibilityactivitiesinthepharmaceuticalindustryempiricalevidencefromkorea |