Cargando…

Interventional radiology versus operative management for splenic injuries: a study protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION: Over the past decades, the treatment for blunt splenic injuries has shifted from operative to non-operative management. Interventional radiology such as splenic arterial embolisation generally increases the success rate of non-operative management. However, the type of intervention, su...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kashiura, Masahiro, Yada, Noritaka, Yamakawa, Kazuma
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6701822/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31401595
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028172
_version_ 1783445120386859008
author Kashiura, Masahiro
Yada, Noritaka
Yamakawa, Kazuma
author_facet Kashiura, Masahiro
Yada, Noritaka
Yamakawa, Kazuma
author_sort Kashiura, Masahiro
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Over the past decades, the treatment for blunt splenic injuries has shifted from operative to non-operative management. Interventional radiology such as splenic arterial embolisation generally increases the success rate of non-operative management. However, the type of intervention, such as the first definitive treatment for haemostasis (interventional radiology or surgery) in blunt splenic injuries is unclear. Therefore, we aim to clarify whether interventional radiology improves mortality in patients with blunt splenic trauma compared with operative management by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will search the following electronic bibliographic databases to retrieve relevant articles for the literature review: Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. We will include controlled trials and observational studies published until September 2018. We will screen search results, assess the study population, extract data and assess the risk of bias. Two review authors will extract data independently, and discrepancies will be identified and resolved through a discussion with a third author where necessary. Data from eligible studies will be pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis. Statistical heterogeneity will be assessed by using the Mantel-Haenszel χ² test and the I² statistic, and any observed heterogeneity will be quantified using the I² statistic. We will conduct sensitivity analyses according to several factors relevant for the heterogeneity. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Our study does not require ethical approval as it is based on the findings of previously published articles. This systematic review will provide guidance on selecting a method for haemostasis of splenic injuries and may also identify knowledge gaps that could direct further research in the field. Results will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presentations at relevant conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018108304.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6701822
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67018222019-09-02 Interventional radiology versus operative management for splenic injuries: a study protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis Kashiura, Masahiro Yada, Noritaka Yamakawa, Kazuma BMJ Open Emergency Medicine INTRODUCTION: Over the past decades, the treatment for blunt splenic injuries has shifted from operative to non-operative management. Interventional radiology such as splenic arterial embolisation generally increases the success rate of non-operative management. However, the type of intervention, such as the first definitive treatment for haemostasis (interventional radiology or surgery) in blunt splenic injuries is unclear. Therefore, we aim to clarify whether interventional radiology improves mortality in patients with blunt splenic trauma compared with operative management by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will search the following electronic bibliographic databases to retrieve relevant articles for the literature review: Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. We will include controlled trials and observational studies published until September 2018. We will screen search results, assess the study population, extract data and assess the risk of bias. Two review authors will extract data independently, and discrepancies will be identified and resolved through a discussion with a third author where necessary. Data from eligible studies will be pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis. Statistical heterogeneity will be assessed by using the Mantel-Haenszel χ² test and the I² statistic, and any observed heterogeneity will be quantified using the I² statistic. We will conduct sensitivity analyses according to several factors relevant for the heterogeneity. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Our study does not require ethical approval as it is based on the findings of previously published articles. This systematic review will provide guidance on selecting a method for haemostasis of splenic injuries and may also identify knowledge gaps that could direct further research in the field. Results will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presentations at relevant conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018108304. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6701822/ /pubmed/31401595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028172 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Emergency Medicine
Kashiura, Masahiro
Yada, Noritaka
Yamakawa, Kazuma
Interventional radiology versus operative management for splenic injuries: a study protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Interventional radiology versus operative management for splenic injuries: a study protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Interventional radiology versus operative management for splenic injuries: a study protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Interventional radiology versus operative management for splenic injuries: a study protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Interventional radiology versus operative management for splenic injuries: a study protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Interventional radiology versus operative management for splenic injuries: a study protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort interventional radiology versus operative management for splenic injuries: a study protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Emergency Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6701822/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31401595
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028172
work_keys_str_mv AT kashiuramasahiro interventionalradiologyversusoperativemanagementforsplenicinjuriesastudyprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yadanoritaka interventionalradiologyversusoperativemanagementforsplenicinjuriesastudyprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yamakawakazuma interventionalradiologyversusoperativemanagementforsplenicinjuriesastudyprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis