Cargando…
Interventional radiology versus operative management for splenic injuries: a study protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
INTRODUCTION: Over the past decades, the treatment for blunt splenic injuries has shifted from operative to non-operative management. Interventional radiology such as splenic arterial embolisation generally increases the success rate of non-operative management. However, the type of intervention, su...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6701822/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31401595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028172 |
_version_ | 1783445120386859008 |
---|---|
author | Kashiura, Masahiro Yada, Noritaka Yamakawa, Kazuma |
author_facet | Kashiura, Masahiro Yada, Noritaka Yamakawa, Kazuma |
author_sort | Kashiura, Masahiro |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Over the past decades, the treatment for blunt splenic injuries has shifted from operative to non-operative management. Interventional radiology such as splenic arterial embolisation generally increases the success rate of non-operative management. However, the type of intervention, such as the first definitive treatment for haemostasis (interventional radiology or surgery) in blunt splenic injuries is unclear. Therefore, we aim to clarify whether interventional radiology improves mortality in patients with blunt splenic trauma compared with operative management by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will search the following electronic bibliographic databases to retrieve relevant articles for the literature review: Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. We will include controlled trials and observational studies published until September 2018. We will screen search results, assess the study population, extract data and assess the risk of bias. Two review authors will extract data independently, and discrepancies will be identified and resolved through a discussion with a third author where necessary. Data from eligible studies will be pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis. Statistical heterogeneity will be assessed by using the Mantel-Haenszel χ² test and the I² statistic, and any observed heterogeneity will be quantified using the I² statistic. We will conduct sensitivity analyses according to several factors relevant for the heterogeneity. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Our study does not require ethical approval as it is based on the findings of previously published articles. This systematic review will provide guidance on selecting a method for haemostasis of splenic injuries and may also identify knowledge gaps that could direct further research in the field. Results will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presentations at relevant conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018108304. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6701822 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-67018222019-09-02 Interventional radiology versus operative management for splenic injuries: a study protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis Kashiura, Masahiro Yada, Noritaka Yamakawa, Kazuma BMJ Open Emergency Medicine INTRODUCTION: Over the past decades, the treatment for blunt splenic injuries has shifted from operative to non-operative management. Interventional radiology such as splenic arterial embolisation generally increases the success rate of non-operative management. However, the type of intervention, such as the first definitive treatment for haemostasis (interventional radiology or surgery) in blunt splenic injuries is unclear. Therefore, we aim to clarify whether interventional radiology improves mortality in patients with blunt splenic trauma compared with operative management by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will search the following electronic bibliographic databases to retrieve relevant articles for the literature review: Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. We will include controlled trials and observational studies published until September 2018. We will screen search results, assess the study population, extract data and assess the risk of bias. Two review authors will extract data independently, and discrepancies will be identified and resolved through a discussion with a third author where necessary. Data from eligible studies will be pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis. Statistical heterogeneity will be assessed by using the Mantel-Haenszel χ² test and the I² statistic, and any observed heterogeneity will be quantified using the I² statistic. We will conduct sensitivity analyses according to several factors relevant for the heterogeneity. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Our study does not require ethical approval as it is based on the findings of previously published articles. This systematic review will provide guidance on selecting a method for haemostasis of splenic injuries and may also identify knowledge gaps that could direct further research in the field. Results will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presentations at relevant conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018108304. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6701822/ /pubmed/31401595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028172 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Emergency Medicine Kashiura, Masahiro Yada, Noritaka Yamakawa, Kazuma Interventional radiology versus operative management for splenic injuries: a study protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Interventional radiology versus operative management for splenic injuries: a study protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Interventional radiology versus operative management for splenic injuries: a study protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Interventional radiology versus operative management for splenic injuries: a study protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Interventional radiology versus operative management for splenic injuries: a study protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Interventional radiology versus operative management for splenic injuries: a study protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | interventional radiology versus operative management for splenic injuries: a study protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Emergency Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6701822/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31401595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028172 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kashiuramasahiro interventionalradiologyversusoperativemanagementforsplenicinjuriesastudyprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yadanoritaka interventionalradiologyversusoperativemanagementforsplenicinjuriesastudyprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yamakawakazuma interventionalradiologyversusoperativemanagementforsplenicinjuriesastudyprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |