Cargando…

Understanding PCR Processes to Draw Meaningful Conclusions from Environmental DNA Studies

As environmental DNA (eDNA) studies have grown in popularity for use in ecological applications, it has become clear that their results differ in significant ways from those of traditional, non-PCR-based surveys. In general, eDNA studies that rely on amplicon sequencing may detect hundreds of specie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kelly, Ryan P., Shelton, Andrew Olaf, Gallego, Ramón
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6702206/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31431641
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-48546-x
_version_ 1783445176720556032
author Kelly, Ryan P.
Shelton, Andrew Olaf
Gallego, Ramón
author_facet Kelly, Ryan P.
Shelton, Andrew Olaf
Gallego, Ramón
author_sort Kelly, Ryan P.
collection PubMed
description As environmental DNA (eDNA) studies have grown in popularity for use in ecological applications, it has become clear that their results differ in significant ways from those of traditional, non-PCR-based surveys. In general, eDNA studies that rely on amplicon sequencing may detect hundreds of species present in a sampled environment, but the resulting species composition can be idiosyncratic, reflecting species’ true biomass abundances poorly or not at all. Here, we use a set of simulations to develop a mechanistic understanding of the processes leading to the kinds of results common in mixed-template PCR-based (metabarcoding) studies. In particular, we focus on the effects of PCR cycle number and primer amplification efficiency on the results of diversity metrics in sequencing studies. We then show that proportional indices of amplicon reads capture trends in taxon biomass with high accuracy, particularly where amplification efficiency is high (median correlation up to 0.97). Our results explain much of the observed behavior of PCR-based studies, and lead to recommendations for best practices in the field.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6702206
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67022062019-08-23 Understanding PCR Processes to Draw Meaningful Conclusions from Environmental DNA Studies Kelly, Ryan P. Shelton, Andrew Olaf Gallego, Ramón Sci Rep Article As environmental DNA (eDNA) studies have grown in popularity for use in ecological applications, it has become clear that their results differ in significant ways from those of traditional, non-PCR-based surveys. In general, eDNA studies that rely on amplicon sequencing may detect hundreds of species present in a sampled environment, but the resulting species composition can be idiosyncratic, reflecting species’ true biomass abundances poorly or not at all. Here, we use a set of simulations to develop a mechanistic understanding of the processes leading to the kinds of results common in mixed-template PCR-based (metabarcoding) studies. In particular, we focus on the effects of PCR cycle number and primer amplification efficiency on the results of diversity metrics in sequencing studies. We then show that proportional indices of amplicon reads capture trends in taxon biomass with high accuracy, particularly where amplification efficiency is high (median correlation up to 0.97). Our results explain much of the observed behavior of PCR-based studies, and lead to recommendations for best practices in the field. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6702206/ /pubmed/31431641 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-48546-x Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Kelly, Ryan P.
Shelton, Andrew Olaf
Gallego, Ramón
Understanding PCR Processes to Draw Meaningful Conclusions from Environmental DNA Studies
title Understanding PCR Processes to Draw Meaningful Conclusions from Environmental DNA Studies
title_full Understanding PCR Processes to Draw Meaningful Conclusions from Environmental DNA Studies
title_fullStr Understanding PCR Processes to Draw Meaningful Conclusions from Environmental DNA Studies
title_full_unstemmed Understanding PCR Processes to Draw Meaningful Conclusions from Environmental DNA Studies
title_short Understanding PCR Processes to Draw Meaningful Conclusions from Environmental DNA Studies
title_sort understanding pcr processes to draw meaningful conclusions from environmental dna studies
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6702206/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31431641
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-48546-x
work_keys_str_mv AT kellyryanp understandingpcrprocessestodrawmeaningfulconclusionsfromenvironmentaldnastudies
AT sheltonandrewolaf understandingpcrprocessestodrawmeaningfulconclusionsfromenvironmentaldnastudies
AT gallegoramon understandingpcrprocessestodrawmeaningfulconclusionsfromenvironmentaldnastudies