Cargando…

Serious Cardiovascular Adverse Events Reported with Intravenous Sedatives: A Retrospective Analysis of the MedWatch Adverse Event Reporting System

BACKGROUND: Serious cardiovascular adverse events (SCAEs) associated with intravenous sedatives remain poorly characterized. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare SCAE incidence, types, and mortality between intravenous benzodiazepines (i.e., diazepam, lorazepam, and midazolam), dexm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Duprey, Matthew S., Al-Qadheeb, Nada S., O’Donnell, Nick, Hoffman, Keith B., Weinstock, Jonathan, Madias, Christopher, Dimbil, Mo, Devlin, John W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6702539/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31399842
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40801-019-00161-y
_version_ 1783445244716515328
author Duprey, Matthew S.
Al-Qadheeb, Nada S.
O’Donnell, Nick
Hoffman, Keith B.
Weinstock, Jonathan
Madias, Christopher
Dimbil, Mo
Devlin, John W.
author_facet Duprey, Matthew S.
Al-Qadheeb, Nada S.
O’Donnell, Nick
Hoffman, Keith B.
Weinstock, Jonathan
Madias, Christopher
Dimbil, Mo
Devlin, John W.
author_sort Duprey, Matthew S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Serious cardiovascular adverse events (SCAEs) associated with intravenous sedatives remain poorly characterized. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare SCAE incidence, types, and mortality between intravenous benzodiazepines (i.e., diazepam, lorazepam, and midazolam), dexmedetomidine, and propofol in the USA over 8 years regardless of the clinical setting where it was administered. METHODS: The Food and Drug Administration’s MedWatch Adverse Event Reporting System was searched between 2004 and 2011 using the Evidex(®) platform from Advera Health Analytics, Inc. to identify all reports that included one or more of ten different SCAEs (package insert incidence ≥ 1%) and where an intravenous benzodiazepine, dexmedetomidine, or propofol was the primary suspected drug. RESULTS: Among the 2326 Food and Drug Administration’s MedWatch Adverse Event Reporting System cases reported, 394 (16.9%) were related to a SCAE. The presence of a SCAE (vs. a non-SCAE) is associated with higher mortality (34 vs. 8%, p < 0.001). The percentage of cases with one or more SCAE, the case mortality rate (%), and the incidence of each SCAE (per 10(6) days of sedative exposure), respectively, were benzodiazepines (14, 26, 13) [diazepam (13, 23, 31); lorazepam (15, 43, 14); midazolam (14, 20, 11)]; dexmedetomidine (40, 15, 13); and propofol (17, 39, 7). Propofol (vs. either a benzodiazepine or dexmedetomidine) was associated with more total SCAEs (268 vs. 126, p < 0.001) but a lower incidence (per 10(6) days of sedative exposure) of SCAE (7 vs. 13, p = 0.0001) and cardiac arrest [6.3 (benzodiazepine) vs. 6.7 (dexmedetomidine) vs. 1.4 (propofol), p < 0.0001]. CONCLUSIONS: Serious cardiac adverse events account for nearly one-fifth of intravenous sedative Food and Drug Administration’s MedWatch Adverse Event Reporting System reports. These SCAEs appear to be associated with greater mortality than non-cardiac serious adverse events. Serious cardiac events may be more prevalent with either benzodiazepines or dexmedetomidine than propofol. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40801-019-00161-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6702539
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67025392019-09-02 Serious Cardiovascular Adverse Events Reported with Intravenous Sedatives: A Retrospective Analysis of the MedWatch Adverse Event Reporting System Duprey, Matthew S. Al-Qadheeb, Nada S. O’Donnell, Nick Hoffman, Keith B. Weinstock, Jonathan Madias, Christopher Dimbil, Mo Devlin, John W. Drugs Real World Outcomes Short Communication BACKGROUND: Serious cardiovascular adverse events (SCAEs) associated with intravenous sedatives remain poorly characterized. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare SCAE incidence, types, and mortality between intravenous benzodiazepines (i.e., diazepam, lorazepam, and midazolam), dexmedetomidine, and propofol in the USA over 8 years regardless of the clinical setting where it was administered. METHODS: The Food and Drug Administration’s MedWatch Adverse Event Reporting System was searched between 2004 and 2011 using the Evidex(®) platform from Advera Health Analytics, Inc. to identify all reports that included one or more of ten different SCAEs (package insert incidence ≥ 1%) and where an intravenous benzodiazepine, dexmedetomidine, or propofol was the primary suspected drug. RESULTS: Among the 2326 Food and Drug Administration’s MedWatch Adverse Event Reporting System cases reported, 394 (16.9%) were related to a SCAE. The presence of a SCAE (vs. a non-SCAE) is associated with higher mortality (34 vs. 8%, p < 0.001). The percentage of cases with one or more SCAE, the case mortality rate (%), and the incidence of each SCAE (per 10(6) days of sedative exposure), respectively, were benzodiazepines (14, 26, 13) [diazepam (13, 23, 31); lorazepam (15, 43, 14); midazolam (14, 20, 11)]; dexmedetomidine (40, 15, 13); and propofol (17, 39, 7). Propofol (vs. either a benzodiazepine or dexmedetomidine) was associated with more total SCAEs (268 vs. 126, p < 0.001) but a lower incidence (per 10(6) days of sedative exposure) of SCAE (7 vs. 13, p = 0.0001) and cardiac arrest [6.3 (benzodiazepine) vs. 6.7 (dexmedetomidine) vs. 1.4 (propofol), p < 0.0001]. CONCLUSIONS: Serious cardiac adverse events account for nearly one-fifth of intravenous sedative Food and Drug Administration’s MedWatch Adverse Event Reporting System reports. These SCAEs appear to be associated with greater mortality than non-cardiac serious adverse events. Serious cardiac events may be more prevalent with either benzodiazepines or dexmedetomidine than propofol. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40801-019-00161-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2019-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6702539/ /pubmed/31399842 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40801-019-00161-y Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Short Communication
Duprey, Matthew S.
Al-Qadheeb, Nada S.
O’Donnell, Nick
Hoffman, Keith B.
Weinstock, Jonathan
Madias, Christopher
Dimbil, Mo
Devlin, John W.
Serious Cardiovascular Adverse Events Reported with Intravenous Sedatives: A Retrospective Analysis of the MedWatch Adverse Event Reporting System
title Serious Cardiovascular Adverse Events Reported with Intravenous Sedatives: A Retrospective Analysis of the MedWatch Adverse Event Reporting System
title_full Serious Cardiovascular Adverse Events Reported with Intravenous Sedatives: A Retrospective Analysis of the MedWatch Adverse Event Reporting System
title_fullStr Serious Cardiovascular Adverse Events Reported with Intravenous Sedatives: A Retrospective Analysis of the MedWatch Adverse Event Reporting System
title_full_unstemmed Serious Cardiovascular Adverse Events Reported with Intravenous Sedatives: A Retrospective Analysis of the MedWatch Adverse Event Reporting System
title_short Serious Cardiovascular Adverse Events Reported with Intravenous Sedatives: A Retrospective Analysis of the MedWatch Adverse Event Reporting System
title_sort serious cardiovascular adverse events reported with intravenous sedatives: a retrospective analysis of the medwatch adverse event reporting system
topic Short Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6702539/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31399842
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40801-019-00161-y
work_keys_str_mv AT dupreymatthews seriouscardiovascularadverseeventsreportedwithintravenoussedativesaretrospectiveanalysisofthemedwatchadverseeventreportingsystem
AT alqadheebnadas seriouscardiovascularadverseeventsreportedwithintravenoussedativesaretrospectiveanalysisofthemedwatchadverseeventreportingsystem
AT odonnellnick seriouscardiovascularadverseeventsreportedwithintravenoussedativesaretrospectiveanalysisofthemedwatchadverseeventreportingsystem
AT hoffmankeithb seriouscardiovascularadverseeventsreportedwithintravenoussedativesaretrospectiveanalysisofthemedwatchadverseeventreportingsystem
AT weinstockjonathan seriouscardiovascularadverseeventsreportedwithintravenoussedativesaretrospectiveanalysisofthemedwatchadverseeventreportingsystem
AT madiaschristopher seriouscardiovascularadverseeventsreportedwithintravenoussedativesaretrospectiveanalysisofthemedwatchadverseeventreportingsystem
AT dimbilmo seriouscardiovascularadverseeventsreportedwithintravenoussedativesaretrospectiveanalysisofthemedwatchadverseeventreportingsystem
AT devlinjohnw seriouscardiovascularadverseeventsreportedwithintravenoussedativesaretrospectiveanalysisofthemedwatchadverseeventreportingsystem