Cargando…

Real-World Evidence on Etanercept Biosimilar SB4 in Etanercept-Naïve or Switching Patients: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION: In 2016, SB4 (Benepali(®)) became the first etanercept (ETN) biosimilar to obtain marketing authorisation in Europe. Despite robust analytical and clinical comparisons, outstanding questions remain on SB4 use in routine practice. METHODS: A systematic search for publications on real-wo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ebbers, Hans C., Pieper, Burkhard, Issa, Amine, Addison, Janet, Freudensprung, Ulrich, Rezk, Mourad F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6702587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31385263
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40744-019-00169-4
_version_ 1783445255923695616
author Ebbers, Hans C.
Pieper, Burkhard
Issa, Amine
Addison, Janet
Freudensprung, Ulrich
Rezk, Mourad F.
author_facet Ebbers, Hans C.
Pieper, Burkhard
Issa, Amine
Addison, Janet
Freudensprung, Ulrich
Rezk, Mourad F.
author_sort Ebbers, Hans C.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: In 2016, SB4 (Benepali(®)) became the first etanercept (ETN) biosimilar to obtain marketing authorisation in Europe. Despite robust analytical and clinical comparisons, outstanding questions remain on SB4 use in routine practice. METHODS: A systematic search for publications on real-world evidence of SB4 effectiveness, safety and drug survival was undertaken using search terms (SB4 OR Benepali OR biosimilar etanercept OR innovator etanercept) in the BIOSIS(®) Toxicology, BIOSIS Previews(®), Embase(®) and MEDLINE(®) databases up to 17 January 2019. RESULTS: Of 959 articles identified, eight journal articles, two journal letters and 23 congress abstracts were selected on criteria of original real-world evidence with a clinical focus. As expected with real-world evidence, quality scoring showed that the evidence had high external validity but lower internal validity. A total of 13,552 patients were described across nine European countries and all approved SB4 indications: 2499 were ETN-naïve and 11,053 switched from reference ETN to SB4 (switchers). Switch acceptance rates (a combination of clinicians offering and patients accepting initiation on SB4) ranged between 51.6% and 99.0%; patient support programmes positively contributed to acceptance. Disease activity was generally similar pre- and post-switch (typically 3-month timeframe). Retention rates across studies were at least 75% (up to 12 months follow-up). No new safety signals were identified. Differences in discontinuation rates versus historic controls reported in some studies may have been influenced by differences in treatment practices, lack of clinician confidence and nocebo effects. CONCLUSION: Nearly 2500 ETN-naïve patients have been initiated on SB4 and outcomes are similar to those patients receiving reference ETN. Overall this systematic review of real-world evidence provides additional reassurance that SB4 is as effective and safe as reference ETN in both switched and naïve patients. FUNDING: Biogen International GmbH. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40744-019-00169-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6702587
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67025872019-09-02 Real-World Evidence on Etanercept Biosimilar SB4 in Etanercept-Naïve or Switching Patients: A Systematic Review Ebbers, Hans C. Pieper, Burkhard Issa, Amine Addison, Janet Freudensprung, Ulrich Rezk, Mourad F. Rheumatol Ther Review INTRODUCTION: In 2016, SB4 (Benepali(®)) became the first etanercept (ETN) biosimilar to obtain marketing authorisation in Europe. Despite robust analytical and clinical comparisons, outstanding questions remain on SB4 use in routine practice. METHODS: A systematic search for publications on real-world evidence of SB4 effectiveness, safety and drug survival was undertaken using search terms (SB4 OR Benepali OR biosimilar etanercept OR innovator etanercept) in the BIOSIS(®) Toxicology, BIOSIS Previews(®), Embase(®) and MEDLINE(®) databases up to 17 January 2019. RESULTS: Of 959 articles identified, eight journal articles, two journal letters and 23 congress abstracts were selected on criteria of original real-world evidence with a clinical focus. As expected with real-world evidence, quality scoring showed that the evidence had high external validity but lower internal validity. A total of 13,552 patients were described across nine European countries and all approved SB4 indications: 2499 were ETN-naïve and 11,053 switched from reference ETN to SB4 (switchers). Switch acceptance rates (a combination of clinicians offering and patients accepting initiation on SB4) ranged between 51.6% and 99.0%; patient support programmes positively contributed to acceptance. Disease activity was generally similar pre- and post-switch (typically 3-month timeframe). Retention rates across studies were at least 75% (up to 12 months follow-up). No new safety signals were identified. Differences in discontinuation rates versus historic controls reported in some studies may have been influenced by differences in treatment practices, lack of clinician confidence and nocebo effects. CONCLUSION: Nearly 2500 ETN-naïve patients have been initiated on SB4 and outcomes are similar to those patients receiving reference ETN. Overall this systematic review of real-world evidence provides additional reassurance that SB4 is as effective and safe as reference ETN in both switched and naïve patients. FUNDING: Biogen International GmbH. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40744-019-00169-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Healthcare 2019-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6702587/ /pubmed/31385263 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40744-019-00169-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review
Ebbers, Hans C.
Pieper, Burkhard
Issa, Amine
Addison, Janet
Freudensprung, Ulrich
Rezk, Mourad F.
Real-World Evidence on Etanercept Biosimilar SB4 in Etanercept-Naïve or Switching Patients: A Systematic Review
title Real-World Evidence on Etanercept Biosimilar SB4 in Etanercept-Naïve or Switching Patients: A Systematic Review
title_full Real-World Evidence on Etanercept Biosimilar SB4 in Etanercept-Naïve or Switching Patients: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Real-World Evidence on Etanercept Biosimilar SB4 in Etanercept-Naïve or Switching Patients: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Real-World Evidence on Etanercept Biosimilar SB4 in Etanercept-Naïve or Switching Patients: A Systematic Review
title_short Real-World Evidence on Etanercept Biosimilar SB4 in Etanercept-Naïve or Switching Patients: A Systematic Review
title_sort real-world evidence on etanercept biosimilar sb4 in etanercept-naïve or switching patients: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6702587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31385263
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40744-019-00169-4
work_keys_str_mv AT ebbershansc realworldevidenceonetanerceptbiosimilarsb4inetanerceptnaiveorswitchingpatientsasystematicreview
AT pieperburkhard realworldevidenceonetanerceptbiosimilarsb4inetanerceptnaiveorswitchingpatientsasystematicreview
AT issaamine realworldevidenceonetanerceptbiosimilarsb4inetanerceptnaiveorswitchingpatientsasystematicreview
AT addisonjanet realworldevidenceonetanerceptbiosimilarsb4inetanerceptnaiveorswitchingpatientsasystematicreview
AT freudensprungulrich realworldevidenceonetanerceptbiosimilarsb4inetanerceptnaiveorswitchingpatientsasystematicreview
AT rezkmouradf realworldevidenceonetanerceptbiosimilarsb4inetanerceptnaiveorswitchingpatientsasystematicreview