Cargando…

A review of simulation applications in temporal bone surgery

BACKGROUND: Temporal bone surgery is a technically challenging and high‐risk procedure in an anatomically complex area. Safe temporal bone surgery emphasizes a consummate anatomic understanding and technique development that requires the guidance of an experienced otologic surgeon and years of pract...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kashikar, Tanisha S., Kerwin, Thomas F., Moberly, Aaron C., Wiet, Gregory J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6703115/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31453352
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.277
_version_ 1783445372328214528
author Kashikar, Tanisha S.
Kerwin, Thomas F.
Moberly, Aaron C.
Wiet, Gregory J.
author_facet Kashikar, Tanisha S.
Kerwin, Thomas F.
Moberly, Aaron C.
Wiet, Gregory J.
author_sort Kashikar, Tanisha S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Temporal bone surgery is a technically challenging and high‐risk procedure in an anatomically complex area. Safe temporal bone surgery emphasizes a consummate anatomic understanding and technique development that requires the guidance of an experienced otologic surgeon and years of practice. Temporal bone simulation can augment otologic surgical training and enable rehearsal of surgical procedures. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this article is to provide an updated review of temporal bone simulation platforms and their uses. DATA SOURCES: PubMed literature search. Search terms included temporal bone, temporal bone simulation, virtual reality (VR), and presurgical planning and rehearsal. DISCUSSION: Various simulation platforms such as cadaveric bone, three‐dimensional (3D) printed models, and VR simulation have been used for temporal bone surgery training. However, each simulation method has its drawbacks. There is a need to improve upon current simulation platforms to enhance surgical training and skills assessment, as well as a need to explore other clinically significant applications of simulation, such as preoperative planning and rehearsal, in otologic surgery. CONCLUSIONS: There is no replacement for actual surgical experience, but high‐fidelity temporal bone models such as those produced with 3D printing and computer simulation have emerged as promising tools in otolaryngologic surgery. Improvements in the fidelity of both 3D printed and VR simulators as well as integration of a standardized assessment format would allow for an expansion in the use of these simulation platforms in training and assessment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6703115
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67031152019-08-26 A review of simulation applications in temporal bone surgery Kashikar, Tanisha S. Kerwin, Thomas F. Moberly, Aaron C. Wiet, Gregory J. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol Otology, Neurotology, and Neuroscience BACKGROUND: Temporal bone surgery is a technically challenging and high‐risk procedure in an anatomically complex area. Safe temporal bone surgery emphasizes a consummate anatomic understanding and technique development that requires the guidance of an experienced otologic surgeon and years of practice. Temporal bone simulation can augment otologic surgical training and enable rehearsal of surgical procedures. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this article is to provide an updated review of temporal bone simulation platforms and their uses. DATA SOURCES: PubMed literature search. Search terms included temporal bone, temporal bone simulation, virtual reality (VR), and presurgical planning and rehearsal. DISCUSSION: Various simulation platforms such as cadaveric bone, three‐dimensional (3D) printed models, and VR simulation have been used for temporal bone surgery training. However, each simulation method has its drawbacks. There is a need to improve upon current simulation platforms to enhance surgical training and skills assessment, as well as a need to explore other clinically significant applications of simulation, such as preoperative planning and rehearsal, in otologic surgery. CONCLUSIONS: There is no replacement for actual surgical experience, but high‐fidelity temporal bone models such as those produced with 3D printing and computer simulation have emerged as promising tools in otolaryngologic surgery. Improvements in the fidelity of both 3D printed and VR simulators as well as integration of a standardized assessment format would allow for an expansion in the use of these simulation platforms in training and assessment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2019-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6703115/ /pubmed/31453352 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.277 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of The Triological Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Otology, Neurotology, and Neuroscience
Kashikar, Tanisha S.
Kerwin, Thomas F.
Moberly, Aaron C.
Wiet, Gregory J.
A review of simulation applications in temporal bone surgery
title A review of simulation applications in temporal bone surgery
title_full A review of simulation applications in temporal bone surgery
title_fullStr A review of simulation applications in temporal bone surgery
title_full_unstemmed A review of simulation applications in temporal bone surgery
title_short A review of simulation applications in temporal bone surgery
title_sort review of simulation applications in temporal bone surgery
topic Otology, Neurotology, and Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6703115/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31453352
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.277
work_keys_str_mv AT kashikartanishas areviewofsimulationapplicationsintemporalbonesurgery
AT kerwinthomasf areviewofsimulationapplicationsintemporalbonesurgery
AT moberlyaaronc areviewofsimulationapplicationsintemporalbonesurgery
AT wietgregoryj areviewofsimulationapplicationsintemporalbonesurgery
AT kashikartanishas reviewofsimulationapplicationsintemporalbonesurgery
AT kerwinthomasf reviewofsimulationapplicationsintemporalbonesurgery
AT moberlyaaronc reviewofsimulationapplicationsintemporalbonesurgery
AT wietgregoryj reviewofsimulationapplicationsintemporalbonesurgery