Cargando…

It takes a community: a landscape analysis of global health research consortia

BACKGROUND: The increased recognition of the core role of effective primary healthcare has identified large gaps in the knowledge of components of high-quality primary healthcare systems and the need for resources positioned to better understand them. Research consortia are an effective approach to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: VanderZanden, Amelia, Langlois, Etienne V, Ghaffar, Abdul, Bitton, Asaf, Fifield, Jocelyn, Hirschhorn, Lisa R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6703292/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31478019
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001450
_version_ 1783445388728991744
author VanderZanden, Amelia
Langlois, Etienne V
Ghaffar, Abdul
Bitton, Asaf
Fifield, Jocelyn
Hirschhorn, Lisa R
author_facet VanderZanden, Amelia
Langlois, Etienne V
Ghaffar, Abdul
Bitton, Asaf
Fifield, Jocelyn
Hirschhorn, Lisa R
author_sort VanderZanden, Amelia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The increased recognition of the core role of effective primary healthcare has identified large gaps in the knowledge of components of high-quality primary healthcare systems and the need for resources positioned to better understand them. Research consortia are an effective approach to generate evidence needed to address knowledge and evidence gaps and accelerate change. However, the optimal design of consortia and guidance on design decisions is not well studied. We report on a landscape analysis to understand global health research consortium models and major design decisions that inform model choice. METHODS: We conducted a landscape analysis to identify health-related research consortia typologies and explore decision processes leading to their design and implementation. We identified and reviewed 195 research consortia, extracted data on organisation, characteristics and operations for 115 and conducted 14 key informant interviews representing 13 consortia. We analysed interviews using thematic content analysis using results to develop categories of major design choices and research consortia models, structures and processes. RESULTS: Across a wide range of research consortia, the structure and function were determined by nine key design decisions that were mapped to three domains: scope: including mission and area of focus; organisational structure: including role and location of the core entity, choice of leader, governance and membership eligibility and responsibility; and funding decisions: including the funding source for research consortia operations and the funding sources and process for consortium research. DISCUSSION: Research consortia showed important heterogeneity across the nine decision points studied and based on their goals, needs and resources. These decisions and the three emerging domains (scope, organisation and funding) offer a potential framework for new research consortia and inform the design of a proposed primary health care research consortium intended to accelerate research to improve primary health care in LMICs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6703292
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67032922019-09-02 It takes a community: a landscape analysis of global health research consortia VanderZanden, Amelia Langlois, Etienne V Ghaffar, Abdul Bitton, Asaf Fifield, Jocelyn Hirschhorn, Lisa R BMJ Glob Health Research BACKGROUND: The increased recognition of the core role of effective primary healthcare has identified large gaps in the knowledge of components of high-quality primary healthcare systems and the need for resources positioned to better understand them. Research consortia are an effective approach to generate evidence needed to address knowledge and evidence gaps and accelerate change. However, the optimal design of consortia and guidance on design decisions is not well studied. We report on a landscape analysis to understand global health research consortium models and major design decisions that inform model choice. METHODS: We conducted a landscape analysis to identify health-related research consortia typologies and explore decision processes leading to their design and implementation. We identified and reviewed 195 research consortia, extracted data on organisation, characteristics and operations for 115 and conducted 14 key informant interviews representing 13 consortia. We analysed interviews using thematic content analysis using results to develop categories of major design choices and research consortia models, structures and processes. RESULTS: Across a wide range of research consortia, the structure and function were determined by nine key design decisions that were mapped to three domains: scope: including mission and area of focus; organisational structure: including role and location of the core entity, choice of leader, governance and membership eligibility and responsibility; and funding decisions: including the funding source for research consortia operations and the funding sources and process for consortium research. DISCUSSION: Research consortia showed important heterogeneity across the nine decision points studied and based on their goals, needs and resources. These decisions and the three emerging domains (scope, organisation and funding) offer a potential framework for new research consortia and inform the design of a proposed primary health care research consortium intended to accelerate research to improve primary health care in LMICs. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6703292/ /pubmed/31478019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001450 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research
VanderZanden, Amelia
Langlois, Etienne V
Ghaffar, Abdul
Bitton, Asaf
Fifield, Jocelyn
Hirschhorn, Lisa R
It takes a community: a landscape analysis of global health research consortia
title It takes a community: a landscape analysis of global health research consortia
title_full It takes a community: a landscape analysis of global health research consortia
title_fullStr It takes a community: a landscape analysis of global health research consortia
title_full_unstemmed It takes a community: a landscape analysis of global health research consortia
title_short It takes a community: a landscape analysis of global health research consortia
title_sort it takes a community: a landscape analysis of global health research consortia
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6703292/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31478019
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001450
work_keys_str_mv AT vanderzandenamelia ittakesacommunityalandscapeanalysisofglobalhealthresearchconsortia
AT langloisetiennev ittakesacommunityalandscapeanalysisofglobalhealthresearchconsortia
AT ghaffarabdul ittakesacommunityalandscapeanalysisofglobalhealthresearchconsortia
AT bittonasaf ittakesacommunityalandscapeanalysisofglobalhealthresearchconsortia
AT fifieldjocelyn ittakesacommunityalandscapeanalysisofglobalhealthresearchconsortia
AT hirschhornlisar ittakesacommunityalandscapeanalysisofglobalhealthresearchconsortia