Cargando…

Primary healthcare system performance in low-income and middle-income countries: a scoping review of the evidence from 2010 to 2017

INTRODUCTION: The 2018 Astana Declaration reaffirmed global commitment to primary healthcare (PHC) as a core strategy to achieve universal health coverage. To meet this potential, PHC in low-income and middle-income countries (LMIC) needs to be strengthened, but research is lacking and fragmented. W...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bitton, Asaf, Fifield, Jocelyn, Ratcliffe, Hannah, Karlage, Ami, Wang, Hong, Veillard, Jeremy H, Schwarz, Dan, Hirschhorn, Lisa R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6703296/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31478028
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001551
_version_ 1783445389690535936
author Bitton, Asaf
Fifield, Jocelyn
Ratcliffe, Hannah
Karlage, Ami
Wang, Hong
Veillard, Jeremy H
Schwarz, Dan
Hirschhorn, Lisa R
author_facet Bitton, Asaf
Fifield, Jocelyn
Ratcliffe, Hannah
Karlage, Ami
Wang, Hong
Veillard, Jeremy H
Schwarz, Dan
Hirschhorn, Lisa R
author_sort Bitton, Asaf
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The 2018 Astana Declaration reaffirmed global commitment to primary healthcare (PHC) as a core strategy to achieve universal health coverage. To meet this potential, PHC in low-income and middle-income countries (LMIC) needs to be strengthened, but research is lacking and fragmented. We conducted a scoping review of the recent literature to assess the state of research on PHC in LMIC and understand where future research is most needed. METHODS: Guided by the Primary Healthcare Performance Initiative (PHCPI) conceptual framework, we conducted searches of the peer-reviewed literature on PHC in LMIC published between 2010 (the publication year of the last major review of PHC in LMIC) and 2017. We also conducted country-specific searches to understand performance trajectories in 14 high-performing countries identified in the previous review. Evidence highlights and gaps for each topic area of the PHCPI framework were extracted and summarised. RESULTS: We retrieved 5219 articles, 207 of which met final inclusion criteria. Many PHC system inputs such as payment and workforce are well-studied. A number of emerging service delivery innovations have early evidence of success but lack evidence for how to scale more broadly. Community-based PHC systems with supportive governmental policies and financing structures (public and private) consistently promote better outcomes and equity. Among the 14 highlighted countries, most maintained or improved progress in the scope of services, quality, access and financial coverage of PHC during the review time period. CONCLUSION: Our findings revealed a heterogeneous focus of recent literature, with ample evidence for effective PHC policies, payment and other system inputs. More variability was seen in key areas of service delivery, underscoring a need for greater emphasis on implementation science and intervention testing. Future evaluations are needed on PHC system capacities and orientation toward social accountability, innovation, management and population health in order to achieve the promise of PHC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6703296
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-67032962019-09-02 Primary healthcare system performance in low-income and middle-income countries: a scoping review of the evidence from 2010 to 2017 Bitton, Asaf Fifield, Jocelyn Ratcliffe, Hannah Karlage, Ami Wang, Hong Veillard, Jeremy H Schwarz, Dan Hirschhorn, Lisa R BMJ Glob Health Research INTRODUCTION: The 2018 Astana Declaration reaffirmed global commitment to primary healthcare (PHC) as a core strategy to achieve universal health coverage. To meet this potential, PHC in low-income and middle-income countries (LMIC) needs to be strengthened, but research is lacking and fragmented. We conducted a scoping review of the recent literature to assess the state of research on PHC in LMIC and understand where future research is most needed. METHODS: Guided by the Primary Healthcare Performance Initiative (PHCPI) conceptual framework, we conducted searches of the peer-reviewed literature on PHC in LMIC published between 2010 (the publication year of the last major review of PHC in LMIC) and 2017. We also conducted country-specific searches to understand performance trajectories in 14 high-performing countries identified in the previous review. Evidence highlights and gaps for each topic area of the PHCPI framework were extracted and summarised. RESULTS: We retrieved 5219 articles, 207 of which met final inclusion criteria. Many PHC system inputs such as payment and workforce are well-studied. A number of emerging service delivery innovations have early evidence of success but lack evidence for how to scale more broadly. Community-based PHC systems with supportive governmental policies and financing structures (public and private) consistently promote better outcomes and equity. Among the 14 highlighted countries, most maintained or improved progress in the scope of services, quality, access and financial coverage of PHC during the review time period. CONCLUSION: Our findings revealed a heterogeneous focus of recent literature, with ample evidence for effective PHC policies, payment and other system inputs. More variability was seen in key areas of service delivery, underscoring a need for greater emphasis on implementation science and intervention testing. Future evaluations are needed on PHC system capacities and orientation toward social accountability, innovation, management and population health in order to achieve the promise of PHC. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6703296/ /pubmed/31478028 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001551 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research
Bitton, Asaf
Fifield, Jocelyn
Ratcliffe, Hannah
Karlage, Ami
Wang, Hong
Veillard, Jeremy H
Schwarz, Dan
Hirschhorn, Lisa R
Primary healthcare system performance in low-income and middle-income countries: a scoping review of the evidence from 2010 to 2017
title Primary healthcare system performance in low-income and middle-income countries: a scoping review of the evidence from 2010 to 2017
title_full Primary healthcare system performance in low-income and middle-income countries: a scoping review of the evidence from 2010 to 2017
title_fullStr Primary healthcare system performance in low-income and middle-income countries: a scoping review of the evidence from 2010 to 2017
title_full_unstemmed Primary healthcare system performance in low-income and middle-income countries: a scoping review of the evidence from 2010 to 2017
title_short Primary healthcare system performance in low-income and middle-income countries: a scoping review of the evidence from 2010 to 2017
title_sort primary healthcare system performance in low-income and middle-income countries: a scoping review of the evidence from 2010 to 2017
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6703296/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31478028
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001551
work_keys_str_mv AT bittonasaf primaryhealthcaresystemperformanceinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesascopingreviewoftheevidencefrom2010to2017
AT fifieldjocelyn primaryhealthcaresystemperformanceinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesascopingreviewoftheevidencefrom2010to2017
AT ratcliffehannah primaryhealthcaresystemperformanceinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesascopingreviewoftheevidencefrom2010to2017
AT karlageami primaryhealthcaresystemperformanceinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesascopingreviewoftheevidencefrom2010to2017
AT wanghong primaryhealthcaresystemperformanceinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesascopingreviewoftheevidencefrom2010to2017
AT veillardjeremyh primaryhealthcaresystemperformanceinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesascopingreviewoftheevidencefrom2010to2017
AT schwarzdan primaryhealthcaresystemperformanceinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesascopingreviewoftheevidencefrom2010to2017
AT hirschhornlisar primaryhealthcaresystemperformanceinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountriesascopingreviewoftheevidencefrom2010to2017